1 / 14

FET in the 6th FP Future and Emerging Technologies (FETs) DG Information Society

FET in the 6th FP Future and Emerging Technologies (FETs) DG Information Society. Nanotechnologies, intelligent mat.,. Information society technologies. Genomic and biotechnology. Food safety and health risks. new production processes. Sustainable development. in the knowledge society.

dora-sellers
Télécharger la présentation

FET in the 6th FP Future and Emerging Technologies (FETs) DG Information Society

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FET in the 6th FP Future and Emerging Technologies (FETs) DG Information Society

  2. Nanotechnologies, intelligent mat., Information society technologies Genomic and biotechnology Food safety and health risks new production processes Sustainable development in the knowledge society Citizens and governance Aeronautics and space and global change for health JRC activities S TRENGTHENING THE STRUCTURING THE ERA FOUNDATIONS OF ERA Research Human Research Science and Coordination Development and resources & infrastructures society of research of research/ innovation mobility activities innovation policies 6th Framework Program:Structure INTEGRATING EUROPEAN RESEARCH P T A / RIORITY HEMATIC REAS ANTICIPATING S/T NEEDS Research for policy Frontier research, support unexpected developments Specific SME activities Specific international cooperation activities

  3. Security, privacy IPRs, dependabilty Smart cards,... Health, eInclusion, mobility, environment safety, cultural heritage GRIDS for science, engineering business and society E and m business, e and m work, learning Specific integration Trust & Security IST for societal challenges IST for economic challenges Demanding applications FET in IST Applied IST for major societal and economic challenges Anywhere anytime natural and enjoyable access to IST services for ALL • Exploring new paradigms and visions at the limit of knowledge • IST’s pathfinder activity • A “nursery” of new ideas • Open scheme and proactive initiatives Pervasive, mobile, wireless, trustful infrastructures Miniaturised, low cost low power components & µsytems Natural interactions with ‘ knowledge ’  Building blocks Generic Communication & networking Software µ, nano & opto electronics µ and nano systems Knowledge technologies interfaces • Mobile: beyond 3G • Fixed:All optical • Integrated (IPv6) • Adaptive • Reliable • Embedded • Distributed • Adaptable • CMOS : the limit • System-on-Chip • Nano-scale • New materials • Multidiscplines • New Sensing • Networked • New materials • Nano-scale • Context based • Semantic based • Agent based • Scaleable • All senses • Multilingual • Intuitive • ‘Surrounding’

  4. FET: The OPEN scheme • Widest possible spectrum, bottom-up • primarily Research but also Support activities • Any innovative idea of quality • high risk / high potential payoff research • longer term foundational research • embryonic research & proof-of-concept

  5. FET: The OPEN scheme • Research: Implemented through STREPs 2-step process • A short proposal submitted first, at any time • from 10 February 2003 onwards • Full proposals only if short proposal was successful • Three evaluation cut-off dates per year (13 May 2003...) • Evaluation: remote and in-Brussels • Real-time process • Support: build research communities through CAs(and SSAs) 1-step process

  6. FET Proactive initiatives • Take an early lead in key future or emerging technologies • Motivated by long-term visions and goals • objective-driven • Implementation: one or more IPs (+ NoE?)

  7. Structure of Proactive Initiatives Advisory Board IP2 • “Stakeholders” • Scientific guidance • National initiatives NoE IP1 Commission • Budget allows for new partners & tasks • Dynamic re-adjustment of objectives & workplan • Review on a continual basis

  8. Roadmap for pro-actives 2003-2004 • 1st Call : Dec 2002 • Beyond robotics • Complex systems research • The disappearing computer 2 • 3rd Call (early 2003; subjects tentative!) • Quantum information processing • Molecular computing • Global computing • Life-like perception and cognition systems

  9. Proposal preparation & submission • Pre-proposals (only for proactive initiatives) • may use form from GfP • Proposal submission • Only 2 parts (A & B) • Non-anonymous (except for FET Open short) • Part B structured following evaluation criteria • For IP/NoE, detailed workplan/JPA for first 18 months • Evaluation process • Eligibility checks • Individual readings (3-5 evaluators) • Consensus • Hearings (for IP/NoE only) • Panel • Remote evaluation possible

  10. Evaluation criteria for FET-Open (STREP)short / full proposal • Relevance (T = 3; W = 30/0) • new ideas involving high risk or long term research • S & T excellence (T = 3/4; W =30/40) • challenging & clearly defined objectives, highly innovative, technical approach • Potential impact (T = 3; W =30) • S&T or economic impact, benefits vs. risk • Quality of the consortium (T = 3; W = 10) • not evaluated in the short proposal • all necessary expertise, commitment, good complementarity • Quality of the management (T = -; W = 10) • not evaluated in the short proposal • Mobilisation of resources (T = 2; W =10) • necessary, sufficient & integrated Overall threshold : 3.5 !

  11. Evaluation criteria for IPs • Relevance (T = 3) • Potential impact (T = 3) • Ambition, use of results, European added value • S&T excellence (T = 4) • Clarity of objectives, progress beyond SOTA, approach • Quality of consortium (T = 3) • quality, complementarity, industrial involvement, suitability and commitment of partners • Quality of management (T = 3) • quality, structure, management of knowledge • Mobilisation of resources (T = 3) • critical mass, integration, financial plan Overall threshold : 24/30 !

  12. Evaluation criteria for NoEs • Relevance (T = 3) • Potential impact (T = 3) • Ambition, strategic need, structuring impact, European added value, “spreading excellence” • Excellence of participants (T = 3) • individual excellence, suitability, critical mass • Degree of integration and JPA (T = 4) • depth and durability of integration, adequacy of JPA • Organisation and management (T = 3) • quality, structure, plan for gender equality Overall threshold : 20/25 !

  13. Information and Contact Points • Open Scheme • http://www.cordis.lu/ist/fetcal-o.htm • Konstantinos.Glinos@cec.eu.int • Beyond Robotics • www.cordis.lu/ist/fetro.htm • Pekka.Karp@cec.eu.int • Complex systems research • http://www.cordis.lu/ist/fetco.htm • Ralph.Dum@cec.eu.int • Disappearing Computer 2 • www.cordis.lu/ist/fetdc2-in.htm • Thomas.Skordas@cec.eu.int

  14. www.cordis.lu/ist www.cordis.lu/ist/fethome.htm • Official Journal (call texts) • IST Workprogramme 2003-2004 • Guides for Proposers • Evaluation Manuals • FET Proactive Initiatives • … FET helpdesk Fax : +32 2 296 8390 E-Mail : istfet@cec.eu.int For further information

More Related