1 / 16

CEIST Presentation

This presentation provides an analysis of capital expenditure in CEIST schools from 2007-2014, comparing it to other sectors. It explores the historical and financial rationale for this level of funding, stakeholders' perspectives, and implications for future decision-making.

dorap
Télécharger la présentation

CEIST Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CEIST Presentation Seamus Lynch September 29th & 30th 2016 School of Education, NUIG / Educena Presentation to CEIST Conference 2016 by Seamus Lynch September 2016

  2. CONTENTS A Research Remit B Initial Research Findings Presentation to CEIST CONFERENCE by Seamus Lynch September 2016

  3. A: Research Journey • MA Economics (UCC), Media Researcher, Teacher • Lecturer in NUIG & MIC – also work for St Angela’s & UL • Have visited most CEIST schools for School Placement • PhD NUIG – 3 Years done • Research opening with CEIST / EDUCENA via Dr. Mary Fleming (Head of School of Education) • Capital expenditure in Secondary Schools 2007-2014 based on ESRI Report (2013) • Research is for both NUIG & CEIST/Educena • 1st Quarterly Report to Educena end of August 2016 Presentation to CEIST Conference by Seamus Lynch September 2016

  4. I A: PhD Research at present: INTERROGATION OF DATA • What was the level of capital spending in CEIST schools between 2007-2014 and how did it compare to other sectors [Educena Quarterly Reports] WORKING RESEARCH QUESTIONS [Case study/Narrative Enquiry] • What is the story of this funding...what is the historical and financial rationale for this level of funding? [PhD] • What are the perspectives of stakeholders regarding the funding of CEIST and other Secondary schools in Ireland? [PhD] • What are the implications of the above for the future decision-making of Educena for their schools? [PhD] Presentation to CEIST Conference by Seamus Lynch September 2016

  5. LiteratureRe: Funding & relevance of faith-based schools IRISH Byrne (2015), De Woulfe & Cassin eds. (2006), McAlpine (2016)*, McElligott (2016)*, Prendergast & Monahan (2003) Bryan (2010), Daly (2009), Daly & Hickey (2011), ESRI (2013), Faas et al. (2016), Parker-Jenkins & Masterson (2013), Kitching (2010, 2013), Mawhinney (2015), O’Donoghue & Harford (2011), O’Toole (2015), Rougier & Honohan (2015) UK Allen & West (2011), Burgess et al. (2014), Butler & Hamnett (2012), Crick & Jelfs (2011), Jackson (2003), McKinney & Conroy (2015), Merry (2007) INTERNATIONAL Judge (2011, 2012), Maussen & Bader (2015), Merry (2015), Ruyter & Merry (2008), Van der Nest & Buchanan (2014), Weisse (2010) Presentation to CEIST Conference by Seamus Lynch September 2016

  6. A: Requirements detail (Educena) • Comparison across the sectors (CEIST schools/Other Voluntary Schools / ETBs) relating to*: • County, region where possible • Greenfield schools / [New Buildings and Extensions*] • Devolved capital funding (direct funding for individual schools) • Summer works / [Improvement works*] • [Extensive Refurbishment/Conversion works*] • Temporary emergency works / [Health and Safety*] • Prefab buildings / [Temporary Accommodation*] Presentation to CEIST Conference by Seamus Lynch September 2016 *ESRI Categorisation in Brackets

  7. B: Research Findings Excel File What is being assembled… DES Statistics…ESRI cross-check Next: FOI? Issues Missing 2008 data? Pre 2012 files for breakdown of approved schools? No breakdown of specific payments (FOI) Some errors (Incorrect county, very small figures quoted etc.) Since Voluntary Schools are such a significant proportion of overall, Non-Voluntary/Others should be looked at v Total? Presentation to CEIST CONFERENCE by Seamus Lynch September 2016

  8. Table 1: Key Capital Expenditure Indicators by Sector 2007-2014 Presentation to CEIST CONFERENCE by Seamus Lynch September 2016 Source: www..des.ie

  9. TABLE 2: Total Capital Expenditure by Sector 2007-2014 Presentation to CEIST CONFERENCE by Seamus Lynch September 2016 Source: www.des.ie

  10. TABLE 3: Additional Accommodation (AA) and Major Building Projects (MBPs) for CEIST Schools v Total * Crude average to avoid ‘double counting’ of repeating schools Source: www.des.ie

  11. Table 5: Expenditure for Main Categories of Schools 2012 to 2016 Presentation to CEIST CONFERENCE by Seamus Lynch September 2016

  12. Table 5: Expenditure for Faith Based Schools 2012 to 2016 Presentation to CEIST CONFERENCE by Seamus Lynch September 2016

  13. CEIST’s approval stats?? Extremely close to the overall schools average - little variation of note across the different types of capital expenditure. • Additional Accommodation: • not distributed significantly more in one sector than others; outliers all among faith-based schools: • Edmund Rice schools 30% more likely to be accessing Additional Accommodation than average • Loretoand Church of Ireland schools avail of it least • Major Building Projects: • very high proportions of the new Educate Together schools and Gaelcholáistí, albeit from a very low base. • Comprehensive Schools are also prominent, though it’s mostly extensions in their case – and also a low sample size • Emergency Works: • Comprehensive Schools’ approval rates highest (71%) • Loretoschools also featuring very highly (69%) • Church of Ireland by far the lowest (16%) gaining from the scheme. • Summer Works: • Comprehensive Schools score highest • Le Chéileschools only other grouping with 10%+ (16%) of approvals to number of schools. Presentation to CEIST CONFERENCE by Seamus Lynch September 2016

  14. THANK YOU! Presentation to CEIST CONFERENCE by Seamus Lynch September 2016

  15. Appendix: Data sources • Amárach research conducted for ESRI (2013) • CEIST Schools • CSO www.cso.ie • DES Database www.education.ie • Education & Training Boards www.etbi.ie • ESRI (2013) • Freedom of Information requests • Houses of the Oireachtas • JMB / www.jmb.ie (Joint Managerial Body for School Management in Voluntary Secondary Schools) • Research/Literature (Irish and International) • Questionnaires, interviews, focus groups Presentation to GRC by Seamus Lynch June 2016

  16. LiteratureRe: Funding & relevance of faith-based schools IRISH Byrne (2015), De Woulfe & Cassin eds. (2006), McAlpine, (2016)*, McElligott (2016)*, Prendergast & Monahan eds. (2003) Bryan (2010), Daly (2009), Daly & Hickey (2011), ESRI (2013), Faas et al. (2016), Parker-Jenkins & Masterson (2013), Kitching (2010, 2013), Mawhinney (2015), O’Donoghue & Harford (2011), O’Toole (2015), Rougier & Honohan (2015) UK Allen & West (2011), Burgess et al. (2014), Butler & Hamnett (2012), Crick & Jelfs (2011), Jackson (2003), McKinney & Conroy (2015), Merry (2007) INTERNATIONAL Judge (2011, 2012), Maussen & Bader (2015), Merry (2015), Ruyter & Merry (2008), Van der Nest & Buchanan (2014), Weisse (2010) Presentation to CEIST Conference by Seamus Lynch September 2016

More Related