1 / 29

Open Questions in Geosciences

Open Questions in Geosciences. Mapping Elements & Structure in the Earth. Geophysics tells us where we are at today Geochemistry tells us how we got there…. Collaborators : - Ricardo Arévalo, Mario Luong : UMD - Kevin Wheeler, Dave Walker : Columbia Univ

dore
Télécharger la présentation

Open Questions in Geosciences

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Open Questions in Geosciences Mapping Elements & Structure in the Earth Geophysics tells us where we are at today Geochemistry tells us how we got there… Collaborators: - Ricardo Arévalo, Mario Luong : UMD - Kevin Wheeler, Dave Walker : Columbia Univ - Corgne, Keshav & Fei : Geophysical Lab, CIW - John Learned : University of Hawaii - Steve Dye: Hawaii Pacific University

  2. 5 Big Questions: • What is the Planetary K/U ratio? • Radiogenic contribution to heat flow? • Distribution of reservoirs in mantle? • Radiogenic elements in the core?? • Nature of the Core-Mantle Boundary? planetary volatility curve secular cooling whole vs layered convection Earth energy budget hidden reservoirs

  3. How much Th, U and K is there in the Earth? Heat flow measurements Geochemical modeling Neutrino Geophysics

  4. Time Line 1st order Structure of Earth Rock surrounding metal 1897 Emil Wiechert 1915 CORE-MANTLE 1925 UPPER-LOWER MANTLE 1935 CORE-MANTLE PLATE TECTONICS 1970 1995

  5. Earth’s Total Surface Heat Flow • Conductive heat flow measured from bore-hole temperature gradient and conductivity Data sources Total heat flow Conventional view 463 TW Challenged recently 311 TW

  6. Urey Ratio and Mantle Convection Models • Mantle convection models typically assume: mantleUrey ratio: 0.4 to 1.0, generally ~0.7 • Geochemical models predict: mantleUrey ratio 0.3 to 0.5 radioactive heat production Urey ratio = heat loss

  7. Discrepancy? • Est. total heat flow, 46 or 31TW est. radiogenic heat production 20TW or 31TW give Urey ratio ~0.3 to ~1 • Where are the problems? • Mantle convection models? • Total heat flow estimates? • Estimates of radiogenic heat production rate? • Geoneutrino measurements can constrain the planetary radiogenic heat production.

  8. “Standard” Planetary Model • Chondrites, primitive meteorites, are key • So too, the composition of the solar photosphere • Refractory elements (RE) in chondritic proportions • Absolute abundances of RE – model dependent • Mg, Fe & Si are non-refractory elements • Chemical gradient in solar system • Non-refractory elements – model dependent • U & Th are RE, whereas K is moderately volatile

  9. U and Th (and K) Distribution in the Earth • U and Th (K?) are thought to be absent from the core and present in the mantle and crust. • Core: Fe-Ni metal alloy • Crust and mantle: silicates • U and Th (and K) concentrations are the highest in the continental crust. • Continents formed by melting of the mantle. • K, U and Th prefer to enter the melt phase • Continental crust: insignificant in terms of mass but major reservoir for U, Th, K.

  10. Th & U Volatility trend @ 1AU from Sun

  11. Silicate Earth REFRACTORY ELEMENTS VOLATILE ELEMENTS Allegre et al (1995), McD & Sun (’95) Palme & O’Neill (2003) ? Lyubetskaya & Korenaga (2007) Normalized concentration Potassium in the core Half-mass Condensation Temperature

  12. sub-title: What is the K/U Th/U ratios for the Earth and modern mantle? Implications and History -- implications: K, Th and U are the radioactive elements that provide the sum of the internal radiogenic heat for the planet -- history: Urey 1950s Wasserburg 1960s Jochum 1980s

  13. First observations -- got it right at the 1-sigma level

  14. SCIENCE Accepted as the fundamental reference and set the bar at K/U = 104 Th/U = 3.5 to 4.0

  15. MORB (i.e., the Depleted Mantle ~ Upper Mantle) K/U ~ 104 and slightly sub-chondritic Th/U DM & Continental Crust – complementary reservoirs DM + Cc = BSE ahh, but the assumptions and samples…

  16. Two types of crust: Oceanic & Continental Oceanic crust: single stage melting of the mantle Continental crust: multi-stage melting processes Compositionally distinct

  17. Continental Crust Not simple to interpret, but K/U ~104 Th/U ~ 4

  18. Oeanic Crust K/U ~ 104 Th/U ~ 4 Crust above = basalt (melt, enriched in K, Th U) Mantle beneath = Refractory peridotite (residue, deplete in K, Th U)

  19. MORB Sample Locations

  20. MORBs: a compositional spectrum

  21. *BABB not included in above diagram,nor in the MORB average

  22. Urey Ratio and Mantle Convection Models • Mantle convection models typically assume: mantleUrey ratio: 0.4 to 1.0, generally ~0.7 • Geochemical models predict: Urey ratio 0.3 to 0.5. radioactive heat production Urey ratio = heat loss

  23. Mantle is depleted in some elements (e.g., Th & U) that are enriched in the continents. -- models of mantle convection and element distribution Th & U poor Th & U rich

  24. 5 Big Questions: • What is the Planetary K/U ratio? • Radiogenic contribution to heat flow? • Distribution of reservoirs in mantle? • Radiogenic elements in the core?? • Nature of the Core-Mantle Boundary? planetary volatility curve secular cooling whole vs layered convection Earth energy budget hidden reservoirs

  25. Long-lived chronometer: 147Sm 143Nd (T1/2 = 106 Ga) 147Sm abundance decreased by only 3% in 4.56 Ga Short-lived chronometer: 146Sm 142Nd (T1/2= 103 Ma) 146Sm exists only in the first 500 Myr of solar system history

  26. 19,000 ± 500 (2sMean)

More Related