Download
slide1 n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Why reposition and suture instead of replace PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Why reposition and suture instead of replace

Why reposition and suture instead of replace

200 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

Why reposition and suture instead of replace

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. 90 y o, 20 y after cataract surgery, 3 y after suturing of left eye, 20/400 preop, 20/40 post op, removal retained lens material

  2. Why reposition and suture instead of replace • Replacement with large one piece PMMA sclerally sutured IOL • Requires large incision • Long healing time and visual recovery • In older patients may be very significant time • Replacement with AC IOL • Longer healing time

  3. dislocation after complicated cataract surgery in patient with NAG s/p PI OU, 20/200 preop, 20/50 post op fixation, secondary BK, 20/40 after DSEK

  4. B, 70 y o Dsek 2007, lens sutured 2 years later, +cme

  5. reasener

  6. Oval pupil corrected with iridoplasty

  7. After lens suturing and iridoplasty

  8. Siepser knot

  9. Why iridoplasty? • Better optics and less glare • Less peripheral anterior Synecheia • Less decrease in outflow • Better tolerance of mild lens decentration

  10. Complications of repair • Retinal detachment • Glaucoma • Corneal edema • Cystoid macular edema • Recurrence of dislocations

  11. Dislocated IOLs • A problem? YES • When to treat: • Prevention: larger capsulotomies, • Capsular tension rings? • When lens causing symptoms or likely to sublux • Surgical options • With appropriate repair outcomes are excellent and recurrences are rare • The least invasive procedure is the best, iris suturing leads to consistent excellent results