1 / 19

CHEMISTRY 2000

CHEMISTRY 2000. Topic #1: Bonding – VB Theory Spring 2008 Dr. Susan Lait. Valence Bond Theory vs. MO Theory. There are two major models for bonding theory:

doria
Télécharger la présentation

CHEMISTRY 2000

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CHEMISTRY 2000 Topic #1: Bonding – VB Theory Spring 2008 Dr. Susan Lait

  2. Valence Bond Theory vs. MO Theory • There are two major models for bonding theory: • We’ve spent the last 2-3 weeks introducing ourselves to molecular orbital theory – in which atomic orbitals are combined to make molecular orbitals in which electrons reside. From a computational perspective, MO calculations are much simpler than the alternative, and there are several very good software packages that allow just about anyone to build models and use MO theory to predict their properties. Even organic chemists.  • The alternative is valence bond theory. In valence bond theory, the orbitals on each atom are first “hybridized” so that they can then be combined to make localized bonds. This is more computationally difficult than molecular orbital theory – particularly for larger molecules. I don’t know of any software packages that will let the “lay chemist” do valence bond calculations. • While some chemists like to mix VB theory into their MO theory (or MO theory into their VB theory), it’s not good practice. Because you are likely to encounter VB terminology at some point in future chemistry courses (or MCATs), we will take a brief look at VB theory.

  3. Valence Bond Theory vs. MO Theory • VB Theory begins with two steps: • hybridization (where necessary to get atomic orbitals that “point at each other”) • combination of hybrid orbitals to make bonds with electron density localized between the two bonding atoms • Key differences between MO and VB theory: • MO theory has electrons distributed over molecule • VB theory localizes an electron pair between two atoms • MO theory combines AOs on DIFFERENT atoms to make MOs (LCAO) • VB theory combines AOs on the SAME atom to make hybridized atomic orbitals (hybridization) • In MO theory, the symmetry (or antisymmetry) must be retained in each orbital. • In VB theory, all orbitals must be looked at at once to see retention of the molecule’s symmetry.

  4. Valence Bond Theory and Hybridization (BeH2) • The VB picture of a molecule derives directly from its molecular geometry. Consider (again) the simplest triatomic: BeH2. • BeH2 is a _________________ molecule with equal Be–H bond lengths. Thus, according to VB theory, Be would need two atomic orbitals of equal energy that are _____ apart. Using only s and p orbitals, this is not possible:

  5. Valence Bond Theory and Hybridization (BeH2) • How to fix this problem (without just using MO theory)? The 2s and 2pz orbitals on the beryllium atom combine to form two hybrid sp orbitals: • The two empty 2p orbitals (2px and 2py) don’t participate in hybridization, giving a Be atom with two 2p orbitals and two 2sp orbitals.Note that the energy of an sp orbital is midway between the energy of the s and p orbitals from which it’s made.

  6. Valence Bond Theory and Hybridization (BeH2) • Now, Be has two hybrid atomic orbitals of equal energy that are _____ apart. Each of these can combine with a 1s orbital on one of the hydrogen atoms to make a  bond:

  7. Valence Bond Theory and Hybridization (BH3) • BH3 would be a ______________________ molecule with equal B–H bond lengths. Thus, B would need three AOs of equal energy that are _____ apart. Again, we can’t do this using only s and p orbitals. • We form three sp2 orbitals from the 2s and two 2p orbitals:

  8. Valence Bond Theory and Hybridization (BH3) • The empty 2p orbital doesn’t participate in hybridization, giving a B atom with one 2p orbital and three 2sp2 orbitals.Note that the energy of an sp2 orbital is closer to the p energy because it has more ‘p character’ than ‘s character’. • Now, B has three hybrid atomic orbitals of equal energy that are _____ apart. Each of these can combine with a 1s orbital on one of the hydrogen atoms to make a  bond:

  9. Valence Bond Theory and Hybridization (CH4) • CH4 is a ______________________ molecule with equal C–H bond lengths. Thus, C would need four atomic orbitals of equal energy that are _____ apart. • We form four sp3 orbitals from the 2s and three 2p orbitals:

  10. Valence Bond Theory and Hybridization (CH4) • Now, C has four hybrid atomicorbitals of equal energy that are _____ apart. Each of these can combine with a 1s orbital on one of the hydrogen atoms to make a  bond:

  11. Valence Bond Theory in Short • Atoms are only hybridized if they “have to be”. As such, terminal atoms are not hybridized. • Geometry determines hybridization: • Linear (180º) = sp (s+p with two leftover p orbitals) • Trigonal planar (120º) = sp2 (s+p+p with one leftover p orbital) • Tetrahedral (109.5º) = sp3 (s+p+p+p with no leftover p orbitals) (http://winter.group.shef.ac.uk/orbitron/AO-hybrids/index.html has nice pictures of each type of hybrid atomic orbital) • Hybrid orbitals have  symmetry and combine with each other (or other -symmetric atomic orbitals) to make  bonds in which two electrons are localized between two atoms. •  bonds for double or triple bonds are made by combining the “leftover” -symmetric p orbitals.

  12. VB Theory for Larger Molecules: Ethane • The Lewis structure for ethane (C2H6) is: • According to VSEPR theory, each carbon atom is ___________ and therefore ____ hybridized. A three-dimensional picture of ethane looks like: To make things easier for those of us who aren’t artists, we use wedges and dashes to indicate 3-dimensional shape. A wedge indicates that an atom is coming out of the page toward you. A series of dashes indicates that an atom is going into the page away from you.

  13. VB Theory for Larger Molecules: Ethane • The bonding in ethane can be explained using sp3 hybridization of each carbon atom and 1s orbitals on each hydrogen. • Each C–H  bond is due to combination of an sp3 orbital from C and an s orbital from H. • The C–C  bond is due to combination of sp3 orbitals from each C. • Because the C–C bond is a  bond, it can be rotated freely without breaking. Ethane is therefore not limited to one conformation. It can rotate freely between them:

  14. VB Theory for Larger Molecules: Ethene • The Lewis structure for ethene (C2H4) is: • According to VSEPR theory, each carbon atom is _____________ and therefore ____ hybridized. A three-dimensional picture of ethene looks like: Ethene is flat so it’s easiest to draw a top-view. If we wanted to draw a side-view, we’d use wedges and dashes. or

  15. VB Theory for Larger Molecules: Ethene • The bonding in ethene can be explained using sp2 hybridization of each carbon atom and 1s orbitals on each hydrogen. • Each C–H  bond is due to combination of an sp2 orbital from C and an s orbital from H. • The C–C  bond is due to combination of sp2 orbitals from each C. • The C–C  bond is due to combination of p orbitals from each C.

  16. VB Theory for Larger Molecules: Ethene • Why is ethene flat? • The only way that the  bond can form is if the two p orbitals are lined up (same symmetry): • If we rotate the C-C bond by 90˚, the C–H  bonds are farther apart, but the p orbitals are orthogonal and therefore do not overlap at all. Thus, there is no  bond: • Since ethene would be much less stable without the  bond, the CH2 fragments are forced to be coplanar, making the molecule flat. In other words, rotating around the C=C bond would require BREAKING the  bond – which requires a fair amount of energy. As such,  bonds always make a molecule more rigid.

  17. VB Theory for Larger Molecules: Ethyne • The Lewis structure for ethyne (C2H2) is: • According to VSEPR theory, each carbon atom is linear and therefore sp hybridized: • Each C–H  bond is due to combination of an sp orbital from C and a 1s orbital from H. • The C–C  bond is due to combination of sp orbitals from each C. • The C–C  bonds are due to combination of 2p orbitals from each C.

  18. VB Theory for Larger Molecules: Formaldehyde • The Lewis structure for formaldehyde (CH2O) is: • According to VSEPR theory, the carbon atom is trigonal planar and therefore sp2 hybridized: • Each C–H  bond is due to combination of an sp2 orbital from C and a 1s orbital from H. • The C–O  bond is due to combination of an sp2 orbital from C and a 2p orbital from O. (You could hybridize O too, but it’s unnecessary.) • The C–O  bond is due to combination of 2p orbitals from C and O. • The lone pairs on O are its two remaining AOs (2s and a 2p).

  19. VB Theory for Larger Molecules: HCN • The Lewis structure for hydrogen cyanide (HCN) is: • According to VSEPR theory, the carbon atom is linear and therefore sp hybridized: • The C–H  bond is due to combination of an sp orbital from C and a 1s orbital from H. • The C–N  bond is due to combination of an sp orbital from C and a 2p orbital from N. (You could hybridize N too, but it’s unnecessary.) • The C–N  bonds are due to combination of 2p orbitals from C and N. • The lone pair on N is its remaining atomic orbital (2s).

More Related