1 / 24

Is My Chemistry Building Safe? AIHCE 2000 - Orlando, FL

Is My Chemistry Building Safe? AIHCE 2000 - Orlando, FL. Michael B. Amster P.E., CIH, CSP, CHMM M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA Michael Sauda CSP University of Maine System, Bangor, ME. Background.

marcy
Télécharger la présentation

Is My Chemistry Building Safe? AIHCE 2000 - Orlando, FL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Is My Chemistry Building Safe?AIHCE 2000 - Orlando, FL Michael B. Amster P.E., CIH, CSP, CHMM M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA Michael Sauda CSP University of Maine System, Bangor, ME

  2. Background • The Chemistry Department is located in an old academic/research Chemistry Building on a campus in the University of Maine System. • Ventilation system sequentially upgraded • Generally not consistent with currently accepted design criteria M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  3. Issue of Concern • To address the Faculty, Staff and Student Committee concerns about the death of two long-time members of the Chemistry Department from identical brain cancers within a period of approximately two years. M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  4. Study Objective • To determine if any chemical(s) are present in the Chemistry Building, previously unnoticed or unidentified, that may be putting the occupants at unnecessary risk. • Conduct air and surface sampling • Provide comment on observations of building activities M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  5. Chemicals/Classes of Concern Committee research: • Volatile Organics, especially chlorinated hydrocarbons: Airborne • Semi-Volatile Organics, especially pesticides: Airborne and Surface • Metals: Surface • Mercury: Airborne M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  6. Sampling Locations • Committee chose sampling locations to include: • Teaching/Research/Support/ Preparation/Instrument/Labs • Classrooms, Auditorium, Faculty Offices, Stock Room M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  7. Sampling Locations • $1,200/point (VOC/Semi-VOC/Metal) • Screening, w/follow-up as necessary Additional Issue: • Physical Chemistry labs for metallic mercury M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  8. Sampling Methods • Airborne: • Quartz lined canisters: VOCs: EPA T0-14, (GC/MS) (M-39+15TICs) • Polyurethane Foam Filter: Semi-VOC: EPA 8270, (GC/MS) (M-98+ 15TICs) • Surface: Wipes • Semi-VOC: EPA 8270, (GC/MS) • Metals: NIOSH 7300, (ICP) (M-20) • Direct Reading: Jerome Meter • Mercury M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  9. Survey Schedule • January: During Break • Building background • Airborne and surface • February: Mid-Semester • Added student/research lab. activity • Airborne only M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  10. Applicable Standards • Airborne • PELs • TLVs • Surface/Wipe Samples • No compliance standards M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  11. ApplicableStandards • ASHRAE 62-1989 - Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality • 1/10 TLV • Guideline for non-industrial exposure • Usual level of detection for IH sampling M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  12. Classroom Method 1,4 Dichlorobenzene (2 ppb) TICs Butane (1 ppb) Acetone (3 ppb) IPA (4 ppb) Faculty Office Method N/D TICs 2,2,4 Trimethylpentane (1 ppb) Isobutane (2 ppb) Butane (2 ppb) Acetone (2 ppb) VOCs (Jan.) M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  13. Support Laboratory Method m,p-Xylene (4 ppb) TICs Propene (4 ppb) Faculty Office Method 1,1,1Trichloroethane (1 ppb) m,p-Xylene (.5 ppb) TICs Propene (10 ppb) VOCs (Feb.) M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  14. Background Office Method Freon 11 (.1 ppb) 1,4 Dichlorobenzene (2 ppb) TICs Isopropanol (70 ppb) VOCs (Feb.) M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  15. Semi-VOCsAirborne (Jan.) • N/D, Method or TICs, per protocol • Detection Limit: Low ppb/High ppt M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  16. Stock Room Method 2-Ethylhexyl Adipate (3 ppb) TICs N/D Semi-VOCsAirborne (Feb.) M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  17. Semi-VOCsSurface • N/D, Method or TICs, per protocol • Detection Limit: Low microgram per square foot M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  18. Metal - Surface Lab, Class Room, and Office Walls ug/ft2 DL (ug) Aluminum (4/5) 14-31 <10 Barium (1/5) 3.4 <1.0 Calcium (5/5) 11-140 <.25 Copper (1/5) 3.0 <1.0 Iron (5/5) 9.7-57 <2.0 M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  19. Metal - Surface Lab, Class Room, and Office Walls ug/ft2 DL (ug) Magnesium (5/5) 3.7-17 <2.0 Manganese (1/5) 1.0 <1.0 Sodium (2/5) 11-17 <10 Lead (1/5) 12 <3.0 Zinc (4/5) 1.2-22 <1.0 M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  20. Mercury - Airborne • Various Research/Teaching Labs, Classrooms, Faculty Offices • .000-.004ppm • Physical Chemistry Lecture Hall • Vacuum rack platform: .000-.006ppm • Visible mercury present M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  21. Mercury - Airborne • Target Faculty Office/Research Lab. • After an already major clean-up • General: .006-.031ppm • Over floor drain: up to .042ppm • PEL 0.1ppm(C) and TLV .025ppm M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  22. Additional Observations • Working Alone: opaque glass, locked doors, accessible communications, need for graded “work permits” • Chemical Movement: dry ice/gas cylinders carried in occupied elevator • General Lab Safety: PPE, proper use of available engineering controls • Redefined: “Academic Freedom” M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  23. Conclusions • Levels of VOC & Semi-VOC well w/in occupational health limits • Nothing insidious, based on analysis • Does not preclude the necessity of upgrading the lab facilities, ventilation design and function • Metals present on surfaces • Housekeeping and personal hygiene M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

  24. Conclusions • Significant levels of mercury remain in the Target Office/Lab. • Remediate before return to beneficial occupancy • Mercury spill precautions in Physical Chemistry Lecture Hall • Spill prevention/control program • Mercury containing equipment replacement M.B. Amster & Associates, Concord, MA

More Related