120 likes | 252 Vues
2011 Health Priorities. Academic Health Programs Health/Biomedical Research. 2011 Health Request. From Health Planning Group Process: 30 Health Academic and Research Proposals Considered Total $3,651,000 25 Recommended to MAUs, in Priority Order Total Recommended $ 2,895,300
E N D
2011 Health Priorities Academic Health Programs Health/Biomedical Research
2011 Health Request • From Health Planning Group Process: • 30 Health Academic and Research Proposals Considered • Total $3,651,000 • 25 Recommended to MAUs, in Priority Order • Total Recommended $2,895,300 • 5Not Recommended • Total Not Recommended $755,700 • Planning Group Recommendations, by MAU: • Multi-Campus/MAU Serving: 10 • UAA 8 • UAF 7 • UAS 0 (1 in Multi-MAU Serving Category)
2011 Health Request • MAU Decisions: • Tier 1 • Academic Health $1,814,400 • Health/Biomedical Research $616,100 • Total Tier 1 $2,430,500 • Tier 2 • Academic Health $924,500 • Health/Biomedical Research $200,000 • Total Tier 2 $1,124,500 • Total from MAUs • 29 Proposals $3,555,000
Central Themes • Reaffirm and use FY11 BOR priorities • Complete half funded increments at UAF (due to appropriation structure) • Combine health research and academic requests into one process • Prioritize INBRE 2 non federal commitments (roughly $600K) • Focus on high demand professions with large vacancies: e.g. dietetics, occupational therapy, ultrasound, pharmacy, physical therapy
Central Themes, continued • Secure industry-related AHEC funds—Providence Hospital, Fairbanks Memorial Hospital, Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation, Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium • Through sustained commitment, we have virtually finished moving academic programs off soft funds (MHTAAR and Denali Commission)
Health Planning Process • Proposals received from MAUs • Discussion of academic and research proposals by planning group via VTC • Tiers created at meeting • Individuals’ prioritization ofeach tier • Summary of individual priorities • Biomedical Subcabinet review of research proposals • Priorities provided to MAUs • MAUs decisions about priorities included in budget requests
Planning Group Participants • John Blake, UAF • Sandra Carroll-Cobb, UAA • Cheryl Easley,UAA • Anita Hartman, UAF • Invited, participated in priority-setting • Jim Liszka, UAA • Pete Pinney, UAF • Karen Perdue, UA • Karen Schmitt, UAS • Jan Harris - Facilitator
Evaluation Considerations • Data driven - industry vacancy data, Department of Labor projections, student and program data • State/industry need for program or expansion • Consistent with the Health Academic Plan • Cost of program/change • Employer partners/site readiness – availability of clinical experiences • Program readiness – faculty, curricular, resources, other • Student readiness – student prospects, enrollment management • Induced course load/GER capacity – availability of pre-requisites • Fit with health package; package total within budget parameters • Balance of selected proposals – topical, academic level, geographic
Proposals Recommended by Health Planning Committee Bold, Red – Tier 1 by MAU
Recommended Proposals, Continued Bold, Red – Tier 1 by MAU
Facility Requirements • Facilities • TVC 4th floor completion • Health Science Building Phase II • Continued Development/Enhancement of Skills and Science Labs • Technology and Equipment • Technology Upgrades for Distance Education • Simulation Technology – planning underway • Equipment Purchase for HSB Phase I • Other Equipment Needs
Next Steps • Continue to track 2009 and 2010 health package initiatives • Establish INBRE-2 • Complete 2009 health vacancy study • Work on AWIB health workforce plan • Update statewide health academic plan • Prepare 3-5 year priorities and timeline