1 / 15

Key Themes from Day 1 Breakouts

Key Themes from Day 1 Breakouts. National Forum on Performance-Based Planning and Programming. September 14, 2010. Lance A. Neumann. Conference Objectives. Develop a common understanding of performance-based planning and programming processes and define the next steps for implementation

dougal
Télécharger la présentation

Key Themes from Day 1 Breakouts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Key Themes from Day 1 Breakouts National Forum on Performance-Based Planning and Programming September 14, 2010 Lance A. Neumann

  2. Conference Objectives • Develop a common understanding of performance-based planning and programming processes and define the next steps for implementation • Identify the challenges in developing performance-based planning and programming processes and recommend strategies to deal with them • Develop practical, agency specific, guidance for performance-based planning and programming • Provide recommendations for a capacity building action plan that reflects the range of needs of a diverse set of agencies

  3. Key Topics • Disclaimer • Positive Vibe • Education/Communication • Collaboration • Planning and Programming • Measures • Data • Targets • Tradeoff Analysis • Challenges • Next Steps

  4. Disclaimer No facilitator, recorder, or breakout participant is responsible for any of the observations that follow

  5. Positive “Vibe” about Performance-based Planning and Programming • Across breakouts and types of agencies • Lots of views about what / how • Caution about very real institutional/political barriers • Need to move beyond “would of, could of, should of” and barriers to constructive next steps

  6. Education and Communication • Real opportunity to use performance-based process to improve communication with stakeholders • More informed discussions • Setting expectations • Cost / potential results • More realistic priorities • …but public more informed. • Elected officials a “special case” • Needs vs. politics • Equity

  7. Connection to Funding • Performance management as tool to help “make the case” • What you get and don’t get • Set expectations • System performance and agency performance • Not “one shot” exercise, must build confidence/trust over time • Tied to projects • Changing rules/eligibility can create incentives for collaboration / new partnerships

  8. Collaboration • Recognize need for stronger collaboration and opportunity to encourage it • Strategic planning and defining common goals and selected measures • Break down institutional barriers • Needs to be continuous • Don’t forget rural agencies

  9. Planning and Programming • Lack of connection between LRPs and programs • Big variation in state / MPO / transit / rural agency relationships • LRP easier to get agreement on broad goals • Programs: local priorities take over • Fair share / equity vs. needs / performance

  10. Measures • May be in good shape for preservations / state of good repair and aspects of mobility • Range of opinion on multinational / mode neutral • Multimodal goals vs. Multimodal measures • People vs. vehicles • Some doing it • Need more focus on • Environment • Freight • Economic development • What about the rurals?

  11. Data • Better use of data to drive / influence decisions • Recognize cost issue • Better data sharing / use of national databases • Visualization • Data gaps

  12. Targets • Opinions vary about usefulness and practicality • Soft vs. hard targets • Implications for consequences / funding • Need to be achievable / consistent with resources

  13. Tradeoff Analysis • Many different types of tradeoffs • Within mode or functional areas • Cross functional within an agency • Cross functions / modes / agencies • Opinions varied about which are possible • Some doing it now even across modes • New tools / data, but… • Costs, complexity, technical capacity • No “black box” • Potential rule for U.S. DOT

  14. Challenges • Institutional • Financial capacity / restrictions • Multiple goals and agencies • Resistance to change • Need for strong relationships and staff buy-in • Sustained collaboration • Technical capacity differences • Size of staff • Capabilities • Ability to deal effectively with Big Brother / Sister • Shifting from political / equity to performance / needs

  15. Next Steps • Sense that there is support to move toward more performance-based planning and programming • Likely to happen in any case • Time to focus on practical next steps • Acknowledge variations in practice and challenges • Build on considerable past work • Define specific actions to move forward

More Related