1 / 37

Who are the Experts?

Who are the Experts?. Simon Kampa IAM Group University of Southampton 20001. Who am I?. 3 rd Year Postgraduate Student IAM Group, University of Southampton Supervisor: Dr. Les Carr Research interests: metadata, semantic web, hypertext, ontologies. Agenda. Introduction and Background

doyle
Télécharger la présentation

Who are the Experts?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Who are the Experts? Simon Kampa IAM Group University of Southampton 20001

  2. Who am I? • 3rd Year Postgraduate Student • IAM Group, University of Southampton • Supervisor: Dr. Les Carr • Research interests: metadata, semantic web, hypertext, ontologies

  3. Agenda • Introduction and Background • Scholarly Research on the WWW • Improvements • ESKIMO • Conclusion

  4. Part 1: IntroductionIn a Nutshell • Problem: Scholarly research poorly supported by the WWW • PhD work draws from • Hypertext • Ontologies and Inference • Semantic Web

  5. Background: Hypertext and Scholars • Problems with representing discourse • Problems with accurately linking a research field • Cognitive and information overload, disorientation • Need meaningful, structured, and consistent links

  6. Background: Ontologies • “Specification of a conceptualisation” • Advantages: communications, system interoperability, consensus, reasoning • Disadvantages: time consuming, difficult to agree on a shared understanding

  7. Background: Semantic Web • Automated information access based on machine-processible semantics • Architecture contains several layers • Intelligent Web • Requires technology from several fields • Metadata and parsers • Knowledge modelling • Reasoning services

  8. Part II: Scholarly Research • Computer Science, Physics, … have good literature support on the WWW • But, current support duplicates traditional approach • Digital libraries and e-journals too literature focused

  9. Research • Research requires systematic investigation of many resources (not only literature) • Scholar = Detective • Traditionally, very labour intensive task • WWW helps, but falls over on: • Search capabilities • Interlinking • Analysis

  10. ACM Digital Library

  11. Some Typical Queries • What other papers has this author published? • What are the prominent papers in agent systems? • Which papers give a broader discussion on link semantics? • What impact has this project had? • Which institutes researching adaptive hypermedia have strong ties? • Who are the experts in agent systems?

  12. Study • Study to investigate use of Web for academic research • 10 participants received typical research queries • Participants behaviour observed • Result: e-Scholar is poorly supported

  13. Other problems … • Corpus not available • Financial barriers • Bibliographic tools • Commentary facilities • Lack of INTEGRATION

  14. Part III: Improvements • Involve entire scholarly community • Interlinking of material • Structured and intuitive access to interlinked research information • Analysis of research to help solve the intricate queries that scholars make

  15. More than just literature …

  16. Interlinking complex fields • Linking a complex field is difficult • Intricate real-life relationships • Combine ontology and hypertext • Ontology: provide the structure and understanding to express relationships • Hypertext: provide the linking mechanism

  17. Ontological Hypertext • Result: intuitive and structured navigation style • Queries can now be resolved by following links, rather than issuing queries • Query-by-linking • Demonstrated in early prototype and then in the OntoPortal project

  18. OntoPortal

  19. OntoPortal

  20. OntoPortal • Framework for creating research portals • Definite authoring overhead • Successfully implemented in • Metadata portal (DERA contract) • Teaching portal • Icon Directory • Provides a basic research environment

  21. Analysis: Inference • Uncover information that the user is otherwise unaware of • Simplest example • Reflexive (hasAuthor  hasWritten) • More interesting • Which papers has this team published? • Complex • Who are the seminal papers?

  22. (Augmented) Bibliometrics • Co-citation, collaboration, impact factors • Can combine with new community knowledge • What impact has this research team had? • Which agent projects collaborate? • Which teams are frequently co-cited?

  23. Part IV: ESKIMO • Extends concepts developed earlier • Developed scholarly community ontology • Added inference abilities • Added bibliometric facilities

  24. The Scholarly Community

  25. Ontology Representation • RDFS used to represent scholarly ontology <rdf:Description ID="Conference"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Class"/> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#Publication_Medium"/> </rdf:Description> . . . <rdf:Description ID="sponsoredBy"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Property"/> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#Conference"/> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#Society"/> </rdf:Description>

  26. The System • Used ACM HT data from last 13 years as dataset • Data cleansing and some manual editing required • Resulted in about: • 12,000 unique instances • 34,000 relationships

  27. Classifying Hypertext

  28. Architecture Overview (in 60 seconds)

  29. ESKIMO

  30. ESKIMO

  31. ESKIMO

  32. ESKIMO

  33. ESKIMO

  34. ESKIMO

  35. ESKIMO

  36. ESKIMO

  37. Part V: Conclusions • Scholarly research poorly supported by the WWW • ESKIMO addresses some of the important issues • Awareness of entire scholarly community • Structured, intuitive interlinking • Ability to resolve the intricate queries we make • Questions?

More Related