1 / 45

Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency for Toxic Substances and Disea

Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. NGA Regional Bioterrorism Workshop CDC Perspectives . Glen Koops, M.P.H. Associate Director for Field Services

drago
Télécharger la présentation

Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency for Toxic Substances and Disea

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Department of Health and Human ServicesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAgency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry NGA Regional Bioterrorism WorkshopCDC Perspectives Glen Koops, M.P.H. Associate Director for Field Services Office of Terrorism Preparedness and Emergency Response May, 13-14, 2004 San Francisco, California

  2. Outline • Strategic Overview • Enhancing State Capacity • State Activities • Evaluation • Workforce Issues • Funding

  3. Strategy

  4. Science Biological Service NuclearRadiological Chemical Trauma/Nat’l.Disasters Systems All-Hazards Approach

  5. PREPAREDETECTREPORTRESPONDCONTAINRECOVER Dimensions of Public Health Readiness Global 1,000s – 100,000s Command and control – vital to assure containment Activate community-wide mass care system – manage the dead Manage high volume of data and information Number of Cases Deliver mass intervention – call up reserve workforce Level of Effort Resources Communicate to stakeholders and public – enhance surveillance & reporting Report – Mobilize Response – Investigate – Prophylaxis 1 Assess – Diagnose – Isolate – Treat – Manage Local Time

  6. Strategy: DETECTION • Early detection/warning is critical to allow for early intervention. • The sooner we know the sooner we can intervene!

  7. ACTION POINT Intersection of Information & Analysis Strategy: DETECTION Current State Law Enforcement Environmental (BioWatch) DoD & VA Border States Pharmacy Data Schools Public Employers Media Cargo/ Imports Laboratory Immigration Clinicians First Responders International Vital Records Veterinary Quarantine Stations Hospitals

  8. ACTION POINT Intersection of Information & Analysis Strategy: DETECTION Key Services & Efforts – Detection Desired State DoD & VA Law Enforcement Environmental (BioWatch) Pharmacy Data Border States Public Schools Employers Media Cargo/ Imports Laboratory Immigration Clinicians First Responders Hospitals Veterinary Vital Records International Quarantine Stations

  9. Strategy: DETECTION • Improving Connectivity for Diagnosis and Detection – 24x7 Clinical Information Hotline – Media and public outreach – Clinician outreach and communication – Blended-media educational programs – Epi-X (2-way communication network) – Other critical channels and audiences – Health alerting – MMWR Dispatch • Quarantine Stations – New York – Chicago – Miami – Atlanta – Los Angeles – San Francisco – Seattle – Honolulu • CDC Laboratories – Biological: Antimicrobial resistance assays; Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP); Throughout Capacity, BSL-4 containment lab, scientific depth – Chemical: Rapid Toxic Screen (150 agents); Blood and Urine Samples; State Labs • Improving Laboratory Diagnosis and Detection Capabilities – Smallpox – Tularemia – Anthrax – Radiation - Plague – Botulinum Toxin – Chemicals in blood and urine

  10. Strategy: DETECTION • Laboratory Response Network (LRN)

  11. Strategy: CONTAINMENT • Strategic National Stockpile (SNS) • Repository of antibiotics, chemical antidotes, antitoxins, life-support medications, IV administration, etc. • Twelve, strategically located, 12-hour push packages • Tailored Vendor Management Inventory (VMI) • VMI deployable within 24 to 36 hours • Technical Advisory and Response Unit (TARU) support

  12. Strategy: CONTAINMENT • Director’s Emergency Operations Center (DEOC) • 7,000 square feet; 85 workstations; 24x7 staff; state-of-the-art communication technologies • Emergency Communications System (ECS) • Concept of Operations based on ICS Model • Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) • Deployable Emergency Response Assets

  13. Strategy: CONTAINMENT • Environmental Microbiology – Water safety research – Detection and survival of select bacterial agents research – Research on remediation of environments and facilities – Exotic bacterial data collection with respect to the environment – Development of lab sampling methods and processes – Studies on the effect of common disinfectants on these agents • Smallpox Readiness – Vaccination of the medical frontline (healthcare, public health, etc.) – Pending licensed vaccine (for those who insist) – Early detection capacity – Rapid control and containment plans – Vaccination of population within 10 days

  14. CDC Efforts to • Enhance State Capacity

  15. CDC Efforts to Enhance State Capacity • Cooperative Agreement for 62 state, major city and territory health departments expands epidemiology and surveillance capacity to detect, investigate, and mitigate health threats. ($2 billion+ invested to date) • 31 Centers for Public Health Preparedness assisting state and local public health emergency preparedness by improving the quantity and quality of the public health and healthcare response workforce. • Increasing the number of state and local public health professionals (1,886) who use Epi-X to share intelligence regarding outbreaks and other emerging health events including those suggestive of bioterrorism. • Rapid assessment of surveillance capacities in 8 priority cities. • Forensic Epidemiology training sessions for public health and law enforcement professionals.

  16. State Activities

  17. State Activites – Progress Report • Statutes and ordinances, timelines and assessments - updated • 24x7 system to receive and evaluate urgent disease reports in place – 49/50 have systems in place • Epidemiologic capacity enhanced • Information technology to assure rapid detection and reporting improving (i.e. BioWatch) • Effective working relationships between clinical and higher-level laboratories • Ongoing education and training of front-line public health and healthcare responders to assure recognition of the early signs and symptoms of unusual health events

  18. State Activities -- Progress Report State and Local Cooperative Agreement Program • 90% of states have response plans for anthrax(78% exercised) • 100% for smallpox (86% exercised) • 90% for plague (76% exercised) • 85% for botulinum toxin (46% exercised) • 92% for RDD/Nuclear events (91% exercised) • 75% for Nerve Agents (70% exercised) • 25/50 completed their state-wide response plans • 50/50 completed their interim SNS plans – work needed!

  19. Site visits by senior CDC management to: • Florida • Nebraska • New Hampshire • New York State • Texas • Washington State

  20. Florida • Developed critical institutional partnerships that will enable long-term readiness that is not dependent on current leaders • Investment in electronic disease mgmt system that will link disease detection-laboratory diagnosis-outbreak investigation-analysis. • Trained 500 lab staff in procedures for handling/transfer of critical agents • Conducted 4 exercises in collaboration with FBI , HAZMAT, state/local law enforcement and fire/rescue • Emphasis on strong corrective action process following exercises • Vaccinated 4,000 persons who will implement mass smallpox vaccination, investigate cases and manage patients.

  21. New York State • Contracts with local health depts have clear deliverables that cover all aspects of preparedness and response: • Protocols for isolation and quarantine • Packaging/transport of lab samples • Processes for rapid diagnoses and agent confirmation • Plans to ensure rapid control and containment • Training of staff and reserve staff as events scale up • Plan linkage with state and regional plans • Partnerships with State Medical Society, Nurses Assoc, Healthcare Association, Community Health Center Assoc, Hospital Assoc, etc. • Developed sophisticated electronic communicable disease reporting and laboratory information systems • Can test for critical agents: Variola major, vaccinia, tularemia, bot toxin, ricin toxin, brucellosis, glanders, Q fever

  22. Texas • Partnerships include 12 Metropolitan Medical Response Systems, 22 councils of Governments, US-Mexico Border Health Commissions, FBI and state/local law enforcement • 3-member epidemiologic response teams assigned in each of the 8 regions • Relationships with 138 labs • Trained 60 Texas Medical Rangers – a reserve corps of the Texas State Guard – through the Center for Public Health Preparedness and Biomedical Research at UT-HSC in San Antonio. Plan to train a total of 1000 • Conducted exercises to test ability to receive and distribute the SNS • Pre-event smallpox preparedness program vaccinated over 4,000 hospital and public health staff

  23. Washington • Assessed all local health jurisdictions and hospitals to determine emergency preparedness and response capacity • Expanded public health workforce at the district level • A new emergency response planners in each of the 9 districts • 9 new learning specialists to coordinate and evaluate preparedness training • 17 new epidemiology response and surveillance coordinators • Critical preparedness capacities are included in the comprehensive public health improvement planning process – result is performance-based and outcome-driven planning

  24. EVALUATION

  25. Project to Define Performance Goals and Indicators . . . • Define “what good looks like” • Culmination year of work • Input from SMEs, Academics, Public Health Partners, other stakeholders • Validated information with extensive literature search

  26. Project to Define Performance Goals and Indicators . . . Performance Goals based on preparedness principles • Systems are connected pieces • Planning should be supported by evidence • Focus is State support of a local response

  27. Project to Define Performance Goals and Indicators . . . Evidence based approachfocuses on areas that the literature indicates that there are problems

  28. Project to Define Performance Goals and Indicators . . Result: • 42 Performance Goals • 47 Indicators

  29. Example: Performance Goal 2: Internal Agency Staff Awareness of Public Health Role and of Other Community Responder Roles

  30. Example: Measure 2: Percent of a random sample of Public Health Agency staff that have response roles can: • Describe their job functions during a response AND the description matches the employee’s role and responsibilities as written in the Agency’s plan and the jurisdiction’s plan • Show documentation of training jointly with response partners whom they are likely to interact with as they carry out disaster role functions • Describe the role and responsibilities of response partners whom they are likely to interact with as they carry out disaster role function • Identify by name and/or job title whom they report to in a disaster • Demonstrate the correct use of equipment used in their emergency job function (e.g., conferencing equipment, blackberries, blast faxing, two-way radios)

  31. Next steps: • Field Test to provide input on validity, reliability, and feasibility • Oklahoma • Florida • Washington • Massachussets • Chicago

  32. Next steps: Determine appropriate method/resources needed to test progress to goal • Random testing (who, how often)? • Self-reporting?

  33. Exercises • System to design and proctor exercises • Conduct performance-based, interactive exercises • Develop system to identify, collect and analyze information about exercises • Develop recommendations for change

  34. Exercises • CDC is working with various agencies to provide opportunities to exercise public health systems • NCEH • ODP • Performance Goals

  35. Exercises National Center for Environmental Health • Scenario and exercise development, implementation and evaluation • 16 grantees annually • Including “injects” that will measure performance goals • Including activities that test Incident Command principles

  36. Exercises Office of Domestic Preparedness • Will test every grantee (DHS) yearly • Working with NCEH to assure PH components are tested with traditional first responder activities

  37. Workforce

  38. Workforce Activities Detection & Reporting Response & Containment Recovery Preparedness • Contact tracking • Education • Quarantine • Response Coordination • Communicating with Clinicians, Public Health & the General Public • Developing Interventions & Therapies • Planning • Exercising • Partnering • Training • System Building • Testing • Surveillance • Clinician Training • Laboratory Diagnostics • Electronic reporting systems • Monitoring community mental health • Applying Lessons learned to continuously improve Response & Containment

  39. Background • State and Local authorities concern over their ability to recruit, hire, train, and retain qualified personnel to rapidly build public health preparedness systems • Assignment of CDC staff has been a successful model for CDC to assist state and local agencies with program planning and implementation

  40. New CDC Initiative (Public Health Readiness Field Program to increase CDC field presence to . . . • 1. Rapidly enhance preparedness of state, local and territorial public health agencies • 2. Improve CDC’s ability to respond to terrorism and other urgent health threats • 3. Address the long-range need for public health leaders at federal, state and local levels

  41. Ideas we are exploring . . . • Multidisciplinary and multi-level assignments • Strong training component: Preparedness “Boot Camp” • Assignments within State/Territorial and Local public health agencies • Foster the “dual use” concept • Mitigate the silo-effect of categorical programs at federal, state, and local levels • Cross-train all CDC assignees so that all have a Readiness Role • Pilot Project to out-place Senior Management Officials to improve coordination of Disease Prevention/Health Promotion/Community Protections grants, cooperative agreements and other CDC activities • Emphasize BT while also support an all-hazards approach • Make a dent in long range public health work force needs

  42. FUNDING

  43. Funding FY04 Appropriation by Budget Line ($1.16 Billion) (compared with $1.54 Billion in FY03) * The appropriation amount of $1.16 billion does not include the rescission and indirect costs.

  44. Funding FY04 Funding: Upgrading State and Local Capacity • Bioterrorism Cooperative Agreement $872 Million • Centers for Public Health Preparedness $29.4 Million • Advanced Practice Centers $ 5.5 Million • Technical Assistance and Oversight $17.9 Million • Epidemic Intelligence Exchange (Epi-X) - $1.8 Million • Cooperative Agreement Technical Assistance – $13.8 Million • Public Health Field Readiness Program – $2.2 Million • Health Alerting $ 9.4 Million Total: $ 934.4 Million

  45. Funding • Funding Concerns • $80 unobligated reported on FSRs (11/1/03) • Draw-down lag • Supplanting • Allocation formula – change?

More Related