1 / 129

Before ABCs After ABCs

Minority Achievement and Achievement Gap End-Of-Grade & End-Of-Course Tests Results 1992-93 to 1999-2000 Gongshu Zhang Evaluation Section Accountability Division NCDPI.

drake
Télécharger la présentation

Before ABCs After ABCs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Minority Achievement and Achievement GapEnd-Of-Grade & End-Of-Course Tests Results1992-93 to 1999-2000Gongshu Zhang Evaluation Section Accountability Division NCDPI GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  2. Part IStudent AchievementProgress on End-Of-Grade (EOG)and End-Of-Course (EOC) Tests[Note that data collection for some tests and/or groups of students started after 1992-93] GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  3. Finding 1All minority and white student groups have made progress since 1993 in terms of percentage of students at/above grade levelas well as mean scale scorein EOG Reading and Math especially after implementation of the ABCs in 1996-97. GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  4. Trend of Student Achievement Grades 3 - 8 EOG Reading: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  5. Trend of Student Achievement Grades 3 to 8 EOG Math: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  6. Trend of Student Achievement Grades 3 to 8 EOG Reading: Mean Scale Score in by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  7. Trend of Student Achievement: Grades 3 to 8 - 1993 to 2000Mean Scale Score in EOG Math by Ethnicity State of North Carolina Before ABCs After ABCs GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  8. Finding 2 Most of the minority groups and the white group have made progress since 1995 in terms of percentage of students at/above grade levelas well as mean scale scorein EOC English I and Algebra I , especially after implementation of the High School ABCs in 1998-99. GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  9. 1995-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on English I EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  10. 1995-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on Algebra I EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  11. 1995-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on Biology EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  12. 1995-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on US History EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  13. 1997-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on ELP EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  14. 1995-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on English I EOC Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  15. 1995-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on Algebra I EOC Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  16. 1995-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on Biology EOC Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  17. 1995-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on US History EOC Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  18. 1997-2000 Trend of Student Achievement on ELP EOC Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  19. Part IIStudent Achievement GapsWhere Are the Gaps?How Big Are the Gaps? GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  20. Finding 3Gaps exist between most of the minority groups and the white group on: percentage of students at/above grade level,mean scale score,percentage of students at Achievement Level IV, andmean scale score for the academically gifted students in EOG Reading and Math GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  21. Student Achievement Gap Trends for Grades 3 - 8 EOG Reading: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  22. Student Achievement Gap Trends for Grades 3 - 8 EOG Math: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  23. Student Achievement Gaps for EOG Reading 2000 Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels by Ethnicity GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  24. Student Achievement Gaps for EOG Math 2000 Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels by Ethnicity GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  25. Student Achievement Gap Trends for Grades 3 - 8 EOG Reading: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  26. Student Achievement Gap Trends for Grades 3 - 8 EOG Math: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  27. Student Achievement Gap Trend for Academically Gifted Students Grades 3 - 8EOG Reading: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  28. Student Achievement Gap Trend for Academically Gifted Students Grades 3 - 8EOG Math: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  29. Finding 4Gaps exist between the males and females within same ethnicityin percentage of students at/above grade level on EOG Reading and Math. GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  30. Student Achievement Gap Gender Trends Grades 3 - 8EOG Reading: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  31. Student Achievement Gap Gender Trends Grades 3 - 8EOG Reading: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  32. Finding 5 Gaps exist between Non-Free/Reduced Lunch and Free/Reduced Lunch Students within the same ethnicityin percentage of students at/above grade level on EOG Reading and Math. GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  33. Student Achievement Gaps for Non-FRL and FRL Student Grades 3 - 8EOG Reading: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  34. Student Achievement Gaps for Non-FRL and FRL Student Grades 3 - 8EOG Math: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  35. Finding 6Gaps exist between most of the minority student groups and white students in percentage of students at/above grade level, and in percentage of students at Achievement Level IVon Five Core Subject EOC Tests GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  36. Student Achievement Gap Trends for English I EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level Ethnicity GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  37. Student Achievement Gap Trends for Algebra I EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level Ethnicity GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  38. Student Achievement Gap Trends for Biology EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level Ethnicity GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  39. Student Achievement Gap Trends for US History EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level Ethnicity GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  40. Student Achievement Gap Trends for ELP EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level Ethnicity GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  41. Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels on the 2000 English I EOC GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  42. Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels on the 2000 Algebra I EOC GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  43. Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels on the 2000 Biology EOC GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  44. Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels on the 2000 US History EOC GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  45. Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels on the 2000 ELP EOC GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  46. Finding 7 Gaps exist between the mean scale scores of Level IV students in all ethnic groupsand the top margin of the Level IV score range on EOGs & EOCs.[Grade 3 only is shown as an example for EOG Tests.] GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  47. Student Achievement Gap Trends among Level IV Students and between Level IV scores and top of Level IV RangeEOG Reading, Grade 3: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Asian White NC Hispanic Am. Indian Black Level IV Level III 960 GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  48. Student Achievement Gap Trends among Level IV Students and between Level IV scores and top of Level IV RangeEOG Math, Grade 3: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Asian White NC Hispanic Am. Indian Black Level VI Level III GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  49. Student Achievement Gap Trends among Level IV Studentsand between Level IV scores and top of Level IV RangeEnglish I EOC: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Level IV Asian White NC Hispanic Am. Indian Black GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

  50. Student Achievement Gap Trends among Level IV Studentsand between Level IV scores and top of Level IV RangeAlgebra I EOC: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Level IV Asian White NC Am. Indian Hispanic Black GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt

More Related