1 / 13

Session: 29 Baseline Survey Presented by Dannie Romney

Session: 29 Baseline Survey Presented by Dannie Romney. Objective 1: Improved use of data for fertiliser recommendation . Indicator 1: % of recommendation specific to cropping systems and/or AEZ and/or taking account of farmer profitability

drake
Télécharger la présentation

Session: 29 Baseline Survey Presented by Dannie Romney

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Session: 29Baseline SurveyPresented by Dannie Romney

  2. Objective 1: Improved use of data for fertiliser recommendation • Indicator 1: % of recommendation specific to cropping systems and/or AEZ and/or taking account of farmer profitability • For researchers, fertilizer companies, agro-dealers: • Question: • Who is making recommendations on fertilizer use? • Official/other • What fertilizer types are available in the area? • For each what are recommended rates? • Are they cropping system / AEZ specific? • Do they take account of farmer profitability? • Note: there may be different recommendations from different sources OPTIMISING FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS IN AFRICA

  3. Objective 2: Increased use of spatial info for extrapolation of nutrient response functions AND decision tools for optimising fertiliser use • Indicator 2.1: Cases of application of modelling and spatial info to extrapolate nutrient response functions • For researchers only – also literature review: • Questions: • Describe cases of using models/tools to generate or verify nutrient response functions • Describe cases where spatial (soil mapping) info been used to extrapolate nutrient response functions OPTIMISING FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS IN AFRICA

  4. Objective 2: Increased use of spatial info for extrapolation of nutrient response functions AND decision tools for optimising fertiliser use • Indicator 2.2: % of researchers and extensionists using fertiliser optimisation tools (that allow economics to be considered) • For researchers and government extensionists: • Questions: • What is the total number of agricultural researchers and extension workers in the Ministry? • What tools are being used to optimise the use of fertilisers? • E.g. look-up tables, information from fertilizer companies, soil maps, digital tools … • Who is using these tools OPTIMISING FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS IN AFRICA

  5. Objective 3: Improved relevance of fertiliser recommendations to stakeholders • Indicator 3: % change of stakeholders involved in development of fertiliser recommendations • For researchers, fertilizer companies, agro-dealers, government extensionists, NGOs, farmers, • Questions: • How are fertilizer recommendations in your country made and revised? • Which stakeholders are involved and how? • Challenge: Is participation a proxy for improved relevance OPTIMISING FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS IN AFRICA

  6. Objective 4: Improved access to info and communication materials for extension • Indicator. 4.1: % change in practitioners able to produce appropriate materials • For researcher, extensionists, Agrodealers, etc.: • Questions: • What materials are available [on soil health/fertilizer recommendations] • How are materials developed in your country? • Who is involved and how? • How are materials customized to the target audience? • If you have materials were they fit for purpose (i.e. relevant to the target audience)? OPTIMISING FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS IN AFRICA

  7. Objective 4: Improved access to info and communication materials for extenionists • Indicator. 4.2: % change in actors who report access to extension materials • For researcher, extensionists, Agrodealers, etc.: • Questions: • What information do different stakeholders have access to? • Different formats • How frequently do you access or receive new materials • How could materials be made more accessible OPTIMISING FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS IN AFRICA

  8. Objective 5: Improved project management and oversight • Ind. 5.1: Outputs achieved on time and within budget • For Grantee: • Question: How many OFRA outputs are there and how many have been achieved on time? • Ind. 5.2: % satisfaction of sub-grantees and partners • For sub-grantees: • Question: Are you satisfied with the grantee performance in managing OFRA? OPTIMISING FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS IN AFRICA

  9. Challenge • Are the indicators right? • Can we use one survey or do we need to customize the questions to each stakeholder? • Do the questions provide suitable evidence or proxy evidence for the indicator as stated? OPTIMISING FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS IN AFRICA

  10. Survey approach: • Resources in sub-grantee budget for survey: (US$) • Mozambique 2,000 • Niger 4,500 • Nigeria 3,000 • Mali 3,500 • For these and other sub-grantees maybe have to use some of the funds budgeted for M&E OPTIMISING FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS IN AFRICA

  11. Survey approach: • Who do we need to talk with to collect the baseline survey? • Suggestion - interviewees broken down as: OPTIMISING FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS IN AFRICA

  12. Survey approach: • How to avail supervision and ensure quality assurance? • I suggest utilise the expertise in the different countries, in collaboration with the new M&E specialist that we’ll interview for this Friday OPTIMISING FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS IN AFRICA

  13. When? • You need to start as soon after this workshop as possible OPTIMISING FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS IN AFRICA

More Related