1 / 51

K. Honscheid Dept. of Physics Ohio State University

a. g. b. New Results from the BaBar Experiment. Part 1: Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry. Part 2: CP Violation and the SM. Part 3: Beyond the Standard Model. K. Honscheid Dept. of Physics Ohio State University. Matter, Energy and the Big Bang.

dtemple
Télécharger la présentation

K. Honscheid Dept. of Physics Ohio State University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. a g b New Results from the BaBar Experiment Part 1: Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry Part 2: CP Violation and the SM Part 3: Beyond the Standard Model K. Honscheid Dept. of Physics Ohio State University K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  2. Matter, Energy and the Big Bang • Einstein showed us that matter and energy are equivalent • When matter and antimatter meet, they annihilate into energy • Energy can also materialize as particle-antiparticle pair Predict: nMatter/nPhoton~ 0 Exp: nb/ng~ (6.1 +/- 0.3) x 10-10 (WMAP) K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  3. So how can this happen? In 1967, A. Sakharov showed that the generation of the net baryon number in the universe requires: • Baryon number violation(Proton Decay) • Thermal non-equilibrium • C and CP violation(Asymmetry between particle and anti-particle) Transition to broken electroweak symmetry provides these conditions K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  4. Experimental Possibilities: • Get equal amounts ofmatter and anti-matter • Wait… • See what’s left(in anything) K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  5. PEP-II Asymmetric B Factory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, California K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  6. The BaBar Experiment K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  7. Preparing the Matter – Antimatter Sample B mesons contain a b quark and a light anti-quark. mB = 5.28 GeV (~5x mProton) The Upsilon(4S) - a copious, clean source of B meson pairs 1 of every 4 hadronic events is a BB pair No other particles produced in Y(4S) decay Equal amounts of matter and anti-matter BB Threshold Collect a few 108 B0 B0 pairs K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  8. Analysis techniques Threshold kinematics: we know the initial energy of the system Event topology Signal Signal (spherical) Background Background (jet-structure) K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  9. Searching for the Asymmetry 227 x 106 B0 Mesons CountB0K+Decays 227 x 106 B0 Mesons CountB0K-+Decays Is N(B0K+) equal to N(B0K-+)? K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  10. Quartz bar Active Detector Surface Particle Cherenkov light How to Tell a Pion from a Kaon Angle of Cherenkov light is related to particle velocity • Transmitted by internal reflection • Detected by~10,000 PMTs K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  11. B0K+ Searching for the Asymmetry 227 x 106 B0 Mesons CountB0K+Decays 227 x 106 B0 Mesons CountB0K-+Decays Is N(B0K+) equal to N(B0K-+)? B0K+ BABAR background subtracted BABAR K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  12. Direct CP Violation in B Decays Using We obtain First confirmed observation of direct CP violation in B decays K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  13. Part 2: CP Violation in the Standard Model CP Operator: coupling q’ q’ g g* CP( ) = q q J J Mirror To incorporate CP violation g ≠ g* (coupling has to be complex) K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  14. l3 l l l2 l3 l2 d s b l=cos(qc)=0.22 u c t The Kobayashi-Maskawa Matrix • The weak interaction can change the favor of quarks and lepton • Quarks couple across generation boundaries • Mass eigenstates are not the weak eigenstates • The CKM Matrix rotates the quarks from one basis to the other Vcb Vub K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  15. The Unitarity TriangleVisualizing CKM information from Bd decays d s b u Vud Vus Vub Vcd Vcs Vcb Vtd Vts Vtb • The CKM matrix Vij is unitary with 4 independent fundamental parameters • Unitarity constraint from 1st and 3rd columns: i V*i3Vi1=0 • Testing the Standard Model • Measure angles, sides in as many ways possible • SM predicts all angles are large c t CKM phases (in Wolfenstein convention) K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  16. Penguin decay Tree decay g G(B) – G(B) G(B) + G(B) A1 = a1 e -if1 A2 = a2 e-if2eid2 A1 = a1 e-if1eid1 |A|2 – |A|2 |A|2 + |A|2 Understanding CP Violation in B  Kp A1 = a1 eif1eid1 A1 = a1 e if1 B0K-p+ + A2 = a2 eif2eid2 B0K+p- + include the strong phase (doesn’t change sign) more than one amplitude with different weak phase; (A = A1+A2) ~ 2sin(f1 - f2) sin(d1 - d2) = 0 Asymmetry = = K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  17. CPV through interference between mixing and decay amplitudes The SM allows B0 B0 oscillations f = b Interference between ‘B  B  fCP’ and ‘B  fCP’ N(B0)-N(B0) N(B0)+N(B0) f = b B0 B0 Mixing and CP Violation A neutral B Meson Mixing frequency Dmd 0.5 ps-1 B0 fraction ~ sin(DmdDt) K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  18. Amplitude of CP asymmetry B0 mixing K0 mixing Quark subprocess Time-Dependent CP Asymmetries c b c CP Eigenstate:hCP = -1 W+ B0 s d d K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  19. t =0 Dz = Dt gbc bg =0.56 l - (e-, m -) The two mesons oscillate coherently : at any given time, if one is a B0 the other is necessarily a B0 Dt picoseconds later, the B 0 (or perhaps its now a B 0) decays. In this example, the tag-side meson decays first. It decays semi-leptonically and the charge of the lepton gives the flavour of the tag-side meson : l -= B 0l+ = B 0. Kaon tags also used. (4S) Time-dependent analysis requires B0flavor tagging At t=0 we know this meson is B0 B 0 rec We need to know the flavour of the B at a reference t=0. B 0 B 0 tag K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  20. sin 2b B tagged sinDmDt B tagged Step by Step Approach to CP Violation 1. Start with a few x 108 B0 B0pairs (more is better) 2. Reconstruct one B0 in a CP eigenstate decay mode 3. Tag the other B to make the matter/antimatter distinction 4. Determine the time between the two B0 decays, Dt 5. Plot Dt distribution separately for B and B tagged events 6. Extract ACP and sin2b Dt (ps) ACP(Dt) Dt (ps) K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  21. (1-2w) sin(2b) w = mis-tag fraction Results: sin 2b and the observation of CP J/yKs and otherb  cc s final states 227 million BB pairs CP = -1 • B  J/ Ks0, Ks0p+p-, p0p0 • B (2S) Ks0 • B c1 Ks0 • B  J/ K*0, K*0  Ks0 • B c Ks0 7730 events CP = +1 • B  J/ KL0 BaBar result: sin2b = 0.722  0.040  0.023 K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  22. (r,h) a * * Vub Vud Vtd Vtb * * Vcd Vcb Vcd Vcb g (0,0) (0,1) The Unitarity Triangle b [23.3 ± 1.5]o K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  23. Tree decay B0B0mixing yKs is not the only CP Eigenstate Access to a from the interference of a b→u decay (g) with B0B0 mixing (b) g a = p - b - g sin2a ACP(t)=sin(2a)sin(DmdDt). K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  24. Time-dependent ACP of B0→p+p- Blue : Fit projection Red : qq background + B0→Kp cross-feed BR result in fact obtained from 97MBB K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  25. pp pp Kp q Kp Kp q pp Houston, we have a problem B0 p+p- B0  K+p- Penguin/Tree ~ 30% K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  26. Tree decay B0B0mixing Penguin decay  The route to sin(2a): Penguin Pollution • Access to a from the interference of a b→u decay (g) with B0B0 mixing (b) g Inc. penguin contribution How can we obtain α from αeff ? Time-dep. asymmetry : NB : T = "tree" amplitude P = "penguin" amplitude K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  27. How to estimate |a-aeff| : Isospin analysis • Use SU(2) to relate decay rates of different hh final states (h  {p,r}) • Need to measure several related B.F.s 2|-eff| Difficult to reconstruct. Limiting factor in analysis Gronau, London : PRL65, 3381 (1990) K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  28. Using isospin relations and • 3 B.F.s • B0p+p- • B+ p+p0 • B0 p0p0 • 2 asymmetries • Cp+p- • Cp0p0 |a-aeff |< 35° • Large penguin pollution ( P/T ) • Isospin analysis not currently viable in the B→ppsystem Now we need B0→p0p0 • 61±17 events in signal peak (227MBB) • Signal significance = 5.0s • Detection efficiency 25% B±→r±p0 • Time-integrated result gives : K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  29. B → rr: Sometimes you have to be lucky P → VV decaythree possible ang mom states: S wave (L=0, CP even) P wave (L=1, CP odd) D wave (L=2, CP even) rhelicity angle We are lucky: ~100% longitudinally polarized! Transverse component taken as zero in analysis PRL 93 (2004) 231801 K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  30. very clean tags Time dependent analysis of B→r+r- • Maximum likelihood fit in 8-D variable space 32133 events in fit sample K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  31. Searching for B→r0r0 • Similar analysis used to search for r0r0 • Dominant systematic stems from the potential interference from B→a1±p± (~22%) c.f. B→p+p- B.F.= 4.7 x 10-6 and B→p0p0 B.F.= 1.2 x 10-6 B (B→r+r-) = 33 x 10-6 K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  32. Isospin analysis using B→rr • The small rate of means • |a-aeff | is small[er] • P/T is small in theB→rrsystem (…Relative to B→ppsystem) • No isospin violation (~1%) • No EW Penguins (~2%) |a-aeff |< 11° K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  33. (r,h) * * Vub Vud Vtd Vtb * * Vcd Vcb Vcd Vcb g b (0,0) (0,1) The Unitarity Triangle [103 ± 11]o a [23.3 ± 1.5]o K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  34. Basic Idea Color suppressed The 3rd Angle: g K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  35. First Look at the Data Only a loose bound on rB with current statistics: (rB)2 = 0.19±0.23 BABAR-CONF-04/039 Several other methods are being investigated More data would help a lot… K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  36. Combined Experimental Constraint on g BABAR & Belle combined K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  37. a * * Vub Vud Vtd Vtb * * Vcd Vcb Vcd Vcb b (0,0) The Unitarity Triangle [103 ± 11]o g [23.3 ± 1.5]o [51+20-34]o K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  38. Putting it all together • The complex phase in the CKM matrix correctly describes CPV in the B meson system. • Based on SM CPV the baryon to photon ratio in the universe should benb/ng~ 10-20 • Experimentally we findnb/ng~ (6.1±0.3) x 10-10 (WMAP) h r K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  39. Part 3: Beyond the Standard Model Part 3: Consistency Checks • FCNC transitions bsg and bdg are sensitive probes of new physics • Precise Standard Model predictions. • Experimental challenges for bdg (Brg Bwg) • Continuum background • Background from bsg (BK*g) (50-100x bigger) Ali et al hep-ph/0405075 K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  40. Combined B0r0g,B0wg,B-r-g results • No signals observed @90% CL K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  41. CKM constraints from Br(w)g BABAR BF ratio upper limit < 0.029 →|Vtd/Vts| < 0.19 (90% CL) Ali et al. hep-ph/0405075 (z2,DR) = (0.85,0.10) no theory error (z2,DR) = (0.75,0.00) with theory error Penguins are starting to provide meaningful CKM constraint rg95% CLBABAR allowed region (inside the blue arc) K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  42. + mixing lCP = -e-2b + mixing lCP = -e-2b + mixing lCP = -e-2b W - t s Vts* Vts* s Vtb Vtb d d W - t d d d d New CP Violating Phases in Penguin Decays? K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  43. hep-ex/0502019 preliminary 114 ± 12 events SM 98 ± 18 events Belle [BELLE-CONF-0435] Update on BfKo K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  44. Reaching for more statistics – B 0  K 0 revisited • Analysis does not require that ss decays through f resonance, it works with non-resonant K+K- as well • 85% of KK is non-resonant – can select clean and high statistics sample • But not ‘golden’ due to possible additional SM contribution with ss popping • But need to understand CP eigenvalue of K+K-KS: - f has well defined CP eigenvalue of +1, - CP of non-resonant KK depends angular momentum L of KK pair • Perform partial wave analysis • Estimate fraction of S wave (CP even) and P wave (CP odd) and calculate average CP eigenvalue from fitted composition K+K- Nsig = 452 ± 28(excl.  res.) OK Not OK K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  45. CP analysis of B  K+K- KS • Result of angular analysis • Result consistent with cross checkusing iso-spin analysis (Belle) • Result of time dependent CP fit hfSK+K-KS/(2fCP-even-1)] = +0.55 ±0.22 ± 0.04 ±0.11 (stat) (syst) (fCP-even) K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  46. s d d s s d K0 K0 K0 hep-ex/0502013 More penguin exercises – B0 KS KS KS • Use beam line as constraint and acceptonly KS with sufficient number of SVXhits. • Decay B0 KS KS KS is ‘golden’ penguin – little SM pollution expected • Although 3-body decay, only L=even partial waves allowed: • CP(KSKSKS) = CP(KS) = even • Result consistent with SM Gershon, Hazumi hep-ph/0402097 hfK0 K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  47. Same technique as Ksp0 hep-ex/0503011 p - p0 p + KS B0 4mm beam 200mm inflated beam IP-Constrained Vertexing • Constrain decay products to beam-spot in x-y: • Vertex precision depends on number of hits in SVT • For 4 hits, Dt resolution as good as with charged-tracks (60% events) • Crosscheck with J/yKS: K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  48. Combined “sin2b” Results Dsin2β~ -2.9 s Dsin2β~ -2.9 s + sin2βPenguin= 0.43 ±0.07 Dsin2β~ -3.7 s …but comparison ignores subleading diagrams ! K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  49. penguin u s s Corrections: b→s Decay Amplitude ~ VubVus* Decays involving Vub enter with decay phase g Doubly-CKM suppressed w.r.t dominant diagram Contributes to all b sss modes color-allowed tree color-suppressed tree Contribute to non-resonant KKKs (requires ss popup from soft g) Contribute to h’Ks, f0Ks, wKs, but not fKs [in KKKs (requires ss popup from soft g)] K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

  50. 2xΔsin2β Adding Theoretical Uncertainties • size of possible discrepancies Δsin2β have been evaluated for some modes: • estimates of deviations based on QCD-motivated specific models; some have difficulties to reconcile with measured B.R. • Beneke at al, NPB675 • Ciuchini at al, hep-ph/0407073 • Cheng et al, hep-ph/0502235 • Buras et al, NPB697 • Charles et al, hep-ph/0406184 • model independent upper limits based on SU(3) flavor symmetry and measured b d,sqqB.R. • [Grossman et al, PRD58; Grossman et al, PRD68; Gronau, Rosner, PLB564; Gronau et al, PLB579; Gronau et al, PLB596; Chiang et al, PRD70] ‘naive’ upper limit based on final state quark content, CKM (λ2) and loop/tree (= 0.2-0.3) suppression factors [Kirkby,Nir, PLB592; Hoecker, hep-ex/0410069] K. Honscheid, WSU Apr. 15, 2005

More Related