1 / 5

Water resources working group discussions summary

Water resources working group discussions summary. Joe Barsugli and the Water resources working group participants. Water Applications Working Group Needs and Recommendations for NCPP.

duke
Télécharger la présentation

Water resources working group discussions summary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Water resources working group discussions summary Joe Barsugli and the Water resources working group participants

  2. Water Applications Working Group Needs and Recommendations for NCPP • Evaluation must be tied to (access to) the projections, not just to obs./gridded data(aggregate? Serve? link to?) • Expand portfolio to include Reanalysis to inform process understanding (link to other variables than T an P locally. • Evaluation is broader than quantitative results. Need Inventory of peer reviewed and gray literature (but utility may be questioned if too large or too time consuming to produce), Description, Skill, Experiences (case studies, which are Quality controlled). Broadly we are authoritative source for evaluation standards, evaluation products and broader evaluative information. • Enhance usability and navigability of the web interface • Provide alternatives, options caveats on how to use the information for various purposes. For example guidance on choice relative to uses where extreme precipitation is important. Could be Dynamic/social media/interactive hub (HAPEX blogs suggested as example “ProjectionGuru” instead of “SeatGuru?). • Utilize social science (through boundary organizations?) on usable information and to track usability. Create outreach and extension. • Other notes – provide entry points to information that follow certain planning paradigms to guide users with lesser sophistication (this may still take a training course or two, or climate translator certification to get to this level). • Could we create an inventory (heavily curated) of GCM-level evaluations?

  3. Schematic of relationships of NCPP Projections Downscaled Qualitative Eval. Translational Info Guidance Quantitative Eval. GCM Evaluations Boundary Organizataions (RISAs; CSCs, ag Hubs)

  4. Entry points and pathways Simplified (Planning Paradigm) entry points ? Projections Direct Tool /Database Access Entry Point Qualitative Eval. Translational Info Guidance Quantitative Eval. GCM Evaluations Boundary Organizations (RISAs; CSCs, ag Hubs) What are the entry points and what are the user paths from asking a question to application of the information?

More Related