1 / 11

Analysis of multihoming in MIPv6 draft-montavont-mobileip-multihoming-pb-statement-05.txt

Analysis of multihoming in MIPv6 draft-montavont-mobileip-multihoming-pb-statement-05.txt. Nicol as Montavont (ENST-Bretagne) Ryuji Wakikawa (Keio University) Thierry Ernst (Keio University / WIDE) Chan-Wah Ng (Panasonic Singapore Labs) Koojana Kuladinithi (University of Bremen). IETF 64

durin
Télécharger la présentation

Analysis of multihoming in MIPv6 draft-montavont-mobileip-multihoming-pb-statement-05.txt

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Analysis of multihoming in MIPv6draft-montavont-mobileip-multihoming-pb-statement-05.txt Nicolas Montavont (ENST-Bretagne) Ryuji Wakikawa (Keio University) Thierry Ernst (Keio University / WIDE) Chan-Wah Ng (Panasonic Singapore Labs) Koojana Kuladinithi (University of Bremen) IETF 64 Vancouver, BC, CA nov. 2005

  2. Structure of the draft • Multihoming / MIP6 related terminology • Requirements • Taxonomy • Scenarios • Issues • IPv6 related issues • MIPv6 related issues • Implementation related issues • Annex: Why flow redirection is needed?

  3. Terminology • Definition of a multihomed MIP6 node In [3], a node is said to be multihomed when it has multiple IPv6 addresses, either because multiple prefixes are advertised on the link(s) the node is attached to, or because the node has multiple interfaces (see the entire definition). For a mobile node operating MIPv6, this may translate into the following definition: A MN operating MIPv6 is said multihomed when it simultaneously has (i) multiple HoAs; (ii) multiple CoAs; and/or (iii) one HoA and one CoA configured on different interfaces. A MN may have multiple HoAs/CoAs in the following cases: • A MN would have multiple HoAs if multiple prefixes are available on the home link or if it has multiple interfaces named on (presumably) distinct home links. • A MN would have multiple CoAs if multiple prefixes are available on the foreign link or if it has multiple interfaces attached to (presumably) distinct foreign links.

  4. Requirements • Goals • Permanent and Ubiquitous Access • Reliability • Load Sharing • Load Balancing/Flow Distribution • Preference Settings • Aggregate Bandwidth • End up with 8 requirements • Note: no performance issues are discussed

  5. Taxonomy • Changes • From # of interfaces, # of HoAs, # of CoAs • To # of HoAs, # of CoAs • End up with 5 cases • (1,1) • (1,n) • (n,1) • (n,n) • (n,0) (no CoAs)

  6. Issues • General IPv6-related issues • MIPv6 specific issues • Considerations for MIPv6 implementation

  7. General IPv6-related issues • Path selection • Separated into • Interface selection • HoA selection • CoA selection • Ingress filtering issues • Failure detection issues • On the MN/CN link • On the path between the MN and the HA • On the path between the HA and the CN • On the path between the MN and the CN (RO)

  8. MIPv6-specific issues • Binding multiple CoAs to one HoA • Binding a HoA as a CoA • Simultaneous location in home and foreign networks Considerations for MIPv6 implementation • Binding a new CoA to the right HoA • Binding HoAs to interfaces • Flow redirection

  9. New sections • Section 6.4: table shows the relationship between issues and scenarios • Annex A: Why a MN may want to redirect flows • Failure detection • New address • Uninterrupted horizontal handover • Change in network capabilities • Initiation of a new flow

  10. What’s missing? • Consider issues related to several HAs • Not treated in the current document • Security issues • Others?

  11. Next steps for the document • Can we consider this draft as a WG document for the following item « An analysis document explaining what are the limitations for mobile hosts using multiple simultaneous Care-of Addresses and Home Agent addresses using Mobile IPv6, whether issues are specific to Mobile IPv6 or not [Informational]. »

More Related