1 / 12

HIGHER PE

This document outlines an analysis of performance in badminton focusing on identifying strengths and weaknesses through various assessment methods. It details the use of match analysis sheets, video observations, and observation sheets to gather qualitative and quantitative data. By comparing performance against a model performer, specific strengths such as consistent high serves and identified weaknesses like ineffective smashes are discussed. This analysis allows for targeted development needs to be established, aiding in overall skill improvement and confidence enhancement in badminton.

duy
Télécharger la présentation

HIGHER PE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HIGHER PE PRACTICE NAB Int 2 Part 1

  2. OUTCOME 1 –Explain performance in an activity • Activity selected is BADMINTON • Question 1 • Describe the methods you used to identify your performance strengths and weaknesses (4 marks)

  3. QUESTION 1 • Consider what you are looking for; • Movement • Mechanical (PAR) • Quality of performance

  4. Question 1 • Video • Scatter diagrams • Observation sheets • Match analysis sheets • Compared to model performer • Questionnaire (grade scale of performance)

  5. QUESTION 1 • Describe how we used the match analysis sheets, video and observation sheets • Video • Tripod in observation gallery • Side on to court • High up / see all • Lines • Opponent • Shuttle flight • Shuttle landing

  6. OUTCOME 1 –Explain performance in an activity • QUESTION 2 • Explain why these methods were appropriate. (4 marks)

  7. QUESTION 2 • Why were the methods you used the correct ones to use? • What info did they provide? • Qualative and quantative info

  8. QUESTION 2 • Observation sheets • One to observe whole game and one for chosen weakness • Observer needs to have an understanding of skill • Model performer • Books • Internet • Observed not in games but through feeds • 10 x high serves for a smash return • video

  9. QUESTION 2 • Video • Pause……..why? • Replay…….why?

  10. OUTCOME 1 –Explain performance in an activity • QUESTION 3 • As a result of analysing your data give a detailed explanation of your strengths and weaknesses. (3 marks)

  11. Question 3 • Compare to; • Model performer you have seen • Statistical success from data gathered • Reference to methods used to gather data • How whole performance was affected • Badminton high serve (strength) always hit back tram line of court – evidence • Smash (weakness) poor preparation phase (why), loosing power, striking early, easily returned. • How did this effect confidence?

  12. OUTCOME 1 –Explain performance in an activity • QUESTION 4 • As a result of analysing your data give a detailed explanation of your development needs. (3 marks)

More Related