1 / 28

The « restructuring» of Research and Development Institutes

The « restructuring» of Research and Development Institutes. Gilbert Nicolaon Kiev June 10, 2008. A « UNIVERSAL » CHALLENGE. A gap between Research and Economy Limited impact of R&D on competitiveness Limited cooperation between RDI and Industry A challenge all over the world

eabraham
Télécharger la présentation

The « restructuring» of Research and Development Institutes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The « restructuring» of Research and Development Institutes Gilbert Nicolaon Kiev June 10, 2008

  2. A « UNIVERSAL » CHALLENGE • A gap between Research and Economy • Limited impact of R&D on competitiveness • Limited cooperation between RDI and Industry • A challenge all over the world • Most countries support R&D • Gvts. expect to get R.O.I. from their R&D spending A UNIVERSAL CHALLENGE ALL OVER THE WORLD

  3. A « WIDE » CHALLENGE • RDIs have the technical competences BUT • Lack of essential competences to innovate: • Industrial links • Market experience • Financial experience • Legal experience EXTERNAL ASSISTANCE IS NEEDED

  4. A « DOUBLE » CHALLENGE STRONG INCENTIVES ARE NEEDED • Res. Scientists are not motivated to work with industry • Industry is not motivated to work with « academic » scientists

  5. A 3 Partners cooperation • Technological Institutes (RDIs) • Provide the appropriate technology services • National industry • Identify the market needs • Suggest “important” R&D topics • The Government(Ministries, agencies ..) • Stimulate the process to boost the economy • Provide incentives • Both ways (for Scientists and for Industry) • Stable over long period of time

  6. Push or Pull ?

  7. Technology Push From the Lab to the market Idea of a scientist Limiting step : selling the idea (and the project) to industry TOP DOWN Market Pull From market needs to the lab AND Back to market Need identified by industry Limiting step : Identifying the customer Identifying the need BOTTOM UP Push or Pull ?

  8. Push or Pull ?

  9. Push or Pull ? • Market pull Will most likely give less « exotic » results but much faster and with a higher success rate • Technology push Will most likely give more « fancy » results but it will take more time DO NOT NEGLECT MARKET PULL

  10. Push or Pull ? • High Tech is very « prestigious » BUT • Traditional sectors industries offer a large market for technology Services DO NOT NEGLECT TRADITIONAL SECTOR INDUSTRIES

  11. RDI Restructuring

  12. R.D.I. Restructuring A challenge all over the world for : Political reasons Economical reasons Financial reasons

  13. R.D.I. Restructuring The ultimate goal is to : • Build up strong links betwwen RDI’s scientists and Industry • Integrate RDIs activity into national economy AND • Provide private financial support for RDIs

  14. R.D.I.Restructuring • Governance • Management • Funding

  15. Governance • A managing board including representatives of Industry • With decision making power • Which defines medium and long range strategy • An executive officer (CEO) with an industrial background ?

  16. Management • Critical size R&D teams • On some « selected » topics • Stimulation of team working • Stimulation of interdisciplinary projects • Technical comitees associating some industry representatives

  17. Management Human Resources Management • Individual evaluation • On a yearly basis • Based on individual goals • Individual « financial » rewards • Based on performances • Incentives to stimulate industrial links

  18. Management • Encouraging communication • External (with industry) • Internal (team work) • Ultimate Goal : • Publicly owned • Privately managed

  19. R.D.I. Funding • From 100% public funds TO • Be « self-sufficient » New funding schemes are : A goal AND A tool

  20. R.D.I.Funding • Ex. : TNO The Netherlands • Ex.Applied US Applied Univ. Centers (in the 80s) • Ex.: ANR (French National Agency for Research) Funding of R&D based on « project »

  21. R.D.I.Funding • Ex. : F.P. 7th program: « Research for the benefit of Smes »(*) A few Smes (3 to 5) + Some RDI (R&D providers) For market oriented projects (*) Former CRAFT Program

  22. Funding Indirect funding • Cifre scholarships • Technology « diagnostics » • Public support for technology services to industry • To hire specialized consultants • To prepare and file a patent • ……. • ……

  23. Two « provocative » statements

  24. Statement Nb.1 Working with industry will « degrade » my scientific level.

  25. Statement Nb. 2 Local industry is very traditional and does not need advanced technology

  26. Thank you for your attention Gilbert Nicolaon Win.tech@club-internet.fr

  27. Policy Exercise No. 1 Applied R&D policy In order to prepare the Ukrainian economy to compete in a free market, when Ukraine will join the E.U., the Minister of Economy asked you to suggest concrete, short and medium term, steps to stimulate RDI restructuring. Describe : processes, actors, measures, schedule…..

  28. Policy Exercise Nb. 2 RDI Management You are the Director of an RDI. You are asked by the Minister to restructure your RDI in light of the forthcoming reform and budget cuts: to recommend 4 or 5 concrete measures to stimulate cooperation with Industry and to increase your revenues from « outside » sources. Management, Human resources, IPR,….

More Related