1 / 15

Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector

Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector. 6 th SilC Meeting Torino, Italk December 17 2007 Bruce Schumm Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics. Many have contributed…. SLAC: Tim Nelson. Kansas State: Dima Onoprienko, Eckard von Toerne.

eadoin
Télécharger la présentation

Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector 6th SilC Meeting Torino, Italk December 17 2007 Bruce Schumm Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics

  2. Many have contributed… SLAC: Tim Nelson Kansas State: Dima Onoprienko, Eckard von Toerne Santa Cruz: Chris Betancourt, Chris Meyer, Tyler Rice, Lori Stevens, Bruce Schumm, Eric Wallace

  3. In all its glory: The SiD Tracker

  4. “Inside-Out” Tracking requires 4 VXD layers For e+e- qq, 5% of charged tracks originate outside of rorg = 2cm “Cheat” these particles and their hits away (remove them from the banks). How well can we do on remaining “non-prompt” tracks?

  5. Initial Tool: Axial Barrel Track Finder (ABTF) Originally written by Tim Nelson to find tracks when VXD is tired or sick. Finds tracks in 5-layer central tracker by extending three-hit seeds inward. Optimized for non-prompt tracks (relax IP constraint, add a few tricks) by UCSC students. UCSC students also added capability to use modular z information

  6. 1cm 5cm 10cm 30cm 1cm 5cm 10cm 30cm Apply to qq events at Z Pole and at Ecm = 500 GeV (require at least 4 hits; all fakes are 4-hit)

  7. Kansas State’s “Garfield” Algorithm Extrapolates calorimeter “stubs” into tracker, attaching hits as appropriate Adapted by UCSC students to run as third-pass tracker, after “cheating” and ABTF Goal: improve efficiency and/or clean up 4-hit tracks and, if we can, reconstruct the 3-hit tracks.

  8. Start with Z-Pole Events ABTF 4-hit tracks already fairly pure; can Garfield help with leftovers?

  9. Garfield gets a few more. But what about3-hit tracks?

  10. Not so exciting. Can we reliably reconstruct tracks that originate outside the second tracking layer?

  11. Seeds-to-Stubs Program Instead, UCSC students proposed matching precise three-hit tracker seeds to Garfield stubs • Helix – Stub Matching (optimized for Z  qq) • Base Difference < 2 mm • Phi Difference < 100 milliradians • Curvature Ratio ( (seed - stub)/ seed ) < 10 e.g.: Position-matching for isolated muons (mm)

  12. Seed-to-Stubs Performance; Z  qq • Of a total of 20 3-hit particles: • 12 were reconstructed as 3-hit tracks, with only 4 fakes • Two additional 4-hit particles were found • BUT: Performance vastly worse for e+e-  qq at Ecm = 500 GeV. Could optimize for this type of event, but do we want to? •  Algorithm tuning dependent on signature under exploration

  13. Next Steps: GSMB? With Jonathan’s help, will generate meta-stable e+e-  stau+ stau- with stau+  ++ gravitino Signature will be stiff charged track with kink (1-prong tau) or star (3-prong tau) in midst of tracker Challenge will be to reconstruct kink again SM background of e+e-  +- We’ve just started on this.

  14. 3-Hit Tracks & Non-Prompt Signatures Probably need 5+1 layers for prompt track If we require 4 hits for non-prompt tracks, sensitive region for kinked tracks is very limited.

  15. Conclusions In the abstract, four-hit tracks (Rorg < 46 cm, compared to Rmax = 125 cm) seem possible with tracker + cal assist Three-hit tracks (Rorg < 72 cm) very scenario-dependent, so trying to look at meaningful signature (GSMB)… what else? Use these signatures to pin down value of z segmentation What about detector concepts other than SiD? Note: Much of this work done with junior and senior UG physics majors.

More Related