1 / 20

Nearshore Breakwater System

Nearshore Breakwater System. Jeffrey A. Melby, PhD. RPE Need. Nearshore JLOTS cease in sea state 3 Existing small ports may not have adequate draft Existing ports are relatively easily denied Need calm water for nearshore JLOTS operations No rapidly installable technology exists

earl
Télécharger la présentation

Nearshore Breakwater System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Nearshore Breakwater System Jeffrey A. Melby, PhD

  2. RPE Need • Nearshore JLOTS cease in sea state 3 • Existing small ports may not have adequate draft • Existing ports are relatively easily denied • Need calm water for nearshore JLOTS operations • No rapidly installable technology exists • Traditional breakwaters and piers require months to construct or repair • Floating causeways are not functional in and above SS3 and do not work nearshore • Huge breaking wave forces in nearshore zone demand a rational engineering approach for both mooring and structural integrity

  3. NBS R&D Program • Operating metrics • Deploy in SS3, Operate in SS1-SS5 • Deploy in 2-3 days • Operate in depths of 0 - 30 ft • Reduce wave heights by 50% • Identify promising ideas • Physical modeling • Numerical modeling • Full scale testing

  4. NBS Primary Concept

  5. Physical Model Study • Conducted 1:20 scale model of fabric tube structure • Wave flume 3’ x 3’ x 148’ • Scaled irregular wave climate • Included sand bed • Roughly scaled fabric elasticity

  6. Model Structures

  7. Physical Model Study • Measurements • Incident and transmitted waves • Displacement of tubes • Forces on fabric • Sediment scour

  8. Wave Overtopping Kt = Ht /Hi Rc = freeboard Hs = wave height Lp = fabric preload Hi Rc Ht

  9. Wave Forces in Fabric Conversion: 4.45 N/lb

  10. Maximum Full-Scale Force Fmax = 13.7 t/50 ft for single tube Fmax = 4.6 t/50 ft for two-tube Hs = 5 ft Hs = 10 ft

  11. Maximum Full-Scale Force

  12. Fabric Tube Connection Transfers Moment

  13. Numerical Modeling • Navier-Stokes Solver • Full solution of non-linear fundamental hydrodynamic equations with turbulence using finite elements • Very efficient mesh handling algorithms • Very large scale grids - O(10 M nodes) • Can be used as rapid prototyping tool for NBS

  14. Navier-Stokes Solver Solved using a finite element formulation with free surface tracking

  15. N-S Solver Examples

  16. waterA.mov

  17. Finite Element Fabric Model

  18. N-S Solution for NBS

  19. Conclusions • Nearshore breakwater required for nearshore logistics • Multi-tube fabric structure shows promise • Navier-Stokes implementation will speed development • Future work with modified geometry has begun

More Related