1 / 15

Semantic Video Classification Based on Subtitles and Domain Terminologies

Semantic Video Classification Based on Subtitles and Domain Terminologies. Polyxeni Katsiouli, Vassileios Tsetsos, Stathes Hadjiefthymiades P ervasive C omputing R esearch G roup C ommunication N etworks L aboratory Department of Informatics and Telecommunications

eben
Télécharger la présentation

Semantic Video Classification Based on Subtitles and Domain Terminologies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Semantic Video Classification Based on Subtitles and Domain Terminologies Polyxeni Katsiouli, Vassileios Tsetsos, Stathes Hadjiefthymiades Pervasive Computing Research Group Communication Networks Laboratory Department of Informatics and Telecommunications University of Athens – Greece KAMC ‘07 @ Genoa, Italy polina@di.uoa.gr polina@di.uoa.gr polina@di.uoa.gr b.tsetsos@di.uoa.gr b.tsetsos@di.uoa.gr b.tsetsos@di.uoa.gr shadj@di.uoa.gr shadj@di.uoa.gr

  2. Outline • The Polysema Platform • Introduction-Motivation • VideoCategorizationMethod • ExperimentalEvaluation • Conclusions - Future Work

  3. Polysema platform • Develops an end-to-end platform for iTV services • Semantics-related research focuses on the development of: • semantics extraction techniques for automatic annotation of audiovisual content, • a personalization framework for iTV services with SW technologies, • a tool with GUI for video annotation and MPEG-7 metadata creation http://polysema.di.uoa.gr

  4. Introduction - Motivation • Multimedia databases are becoming popular • Most video classification methods are based on visual/audio signal processing • Text processing is more lightweight than visual/audio processing • High-level semantics are more closely related to human language than to visual features • Subtitles capture the semantics of the corresponding video

  5. Step 1: Text Preprocessing • Subtitles are segmented into sentences • A Part of Speech Tagger is applied to each sentence • Stop words (e.g., “to”, “him”) are removed based on a stop words list

  6. Step 2: Keyword extraction • We used the TextRank algorithm to extract keywords • TextRank • represents the text as a graph, • applies to the vertices a ranking algorithm based on Google’s PageRank, • sorts vertices in decreasing rank order, • extracts the top highly ranked vertices for further processing TextRank: Mihalcea, R., Tarau, P.: TextRank: Bringing Order into Texts, in Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2004), Barcelona, Spain, July 2004

  7. Step 3: Word Sense Disambiguation • Words have many possible meanings, called senses • A Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) algorithm is applied to determine the correct sense of each word • WSD • is based on the lexical database WordNet, • is a variation of Lesk’s WSD algorithm WSD: Banerjee, S., Pedersen, T.: An Adapted Lesk Algorithm for Word Sense Disambiguation Using WordNet. In the Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLING-02) Mexico City, Mexico (2002)

  8. Step 4: WordNet Domains Extraction (1/2) • augment WordNet with domain labels • a taxonomy of ~200 domain labels • synsets have been annotated with at least one domain label WordNet domains WN domains: http://wndomains.itc.it/wordnetdomains.html

  9. Step 4: WordNet Domains Extraction (2/2) • For each video: • Extract the WordNet domains for each keyword’s sense • Calculate the frequency occurrence of each domain label • Sort domain labels in decreasing order according to their occurrence frequency

  10. Step 5: Correspondences between categories & WN domains • For each category label: • Look up in WordNet the senses related to it (include senses related through hypernym & hyponym relations) • Obtain the corresponding WordNet domains • Calculate the occurrence score for each domain • Sort domains in decreasing occurrence order Example:

  11. Step6: Category label assignment • Compare the ordered list with the WN domains of each video with the ordered list of the WN domains of each category Example: WN domains of a video science animals

  12. Experimental Evaluation (1/2) • 36 subtitle files of documentaries • 36 subtitle files of documentaries Statistical information of files (average values): • Classify under the categories: geography, animals, history, war, technology, science, accidents, music, transportation, people, religious, politics, arts • Classify under the categories: geography, animals, history, war, technology, science, accidents, music, transportation, people, religious, politics, arts

  13. Experimental Evaluation (2/2) • Classifiers: • Proposed method • Proposed method in which Step 6 has been replaced with Spearman’s footrule distance • J4.8 • decision tree classifier • supervised approach

  14. Conclusions – Future Work • Conclusions • A novel approach that is based only on text and uses natural language processing techniques • No training phase is required (unsupervised approach) • Future Work • The application of a method on a per video segment basis • Definition of domain knowledge more close to movie classification • Performance comparison with other unsupervised approaches

  15. Thank you! Questions??? http://p-comp.di.uoa.gr

More Related