Utilizing Pareto Analysis and Statistical Process Control for Quality Management Improvement
510 likes | 659 Vues
This text discusses the importance of Pareto Analysis in identifying the few vital causes of problems in manufacturing processes, leading to improved quality management. It emphasizes that 80% of issues arise from just 20% of causes. The document also explores Statistical Process Control (SPC) techniques, such as X-bar and R charts, used to monitor and maintain quality in large-scale manufacturing. These methods help prevent defects by measuring variations and assessing manufacturing processes. Additionally, the significance of normal distribution and variance in analyzing data is highlighted.
Utilizing Pareto Analysis and Statistical Process Control for Quality Management Improvement
E N D
Presentation Transcript
LC Technology Manufacturing Systems
Quality Management – Pareto Analysis Pinpoints problems through the identification and separation of the ‘vital few’ problems from the trivial many. Vilifredo Pareto: concluded that 80% of the problems with any process are due to 20% of the causes.
Quality Management – Pareto Analysis Causes of poor soldering
Quality Management – Pareto Analysis Causes of poor soldering – descending order
Quality Management – Pareto Analysis Cumulative plot is made of all of the causes 80% caused by two problems
Statistical Process Control • Statistical procedure to verify quality • Check manufacturing process is working correctly • Inspect and measure manufacturing process • Varying from target – corrective action taken • Prevents poor quality before it occurs
Statistical Process Control • When? Manufacturing large quantities of items • Euro coins • Computers • Cars etc. • Why? • Impractical to measure each item made • Machine/equipment/human error • How? • Measure a small proportion of the produced items (sample) • Use X-bar and R Charts to see if process is in control • Conclude the quality characteristics of the whole process
Normal Distribution Laser machine A – cutting 20mm hole Some measurement < 20mm Some measurements > 20mm Natural occurrence
Normal Distribution • Machine B making same part as machine A • Same distribution • Skewed to right
Normal Distribution • Histogram: • Statistical information • Column width represents a range of sizes • Shape of histogram is proportional to spread of data Results of a survey on the heights of a group of pupils in a large school Column width = 25mm
Normal Distribution Larger survey – population of a town Column width = 10mm • Centered about mean • Characteristic ‘Bell’ shape curve • Number of occurrences reduce as they deviate from the mean
Normal Distribution A very small sample interval approximates a curve as shown
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Normal Distribution All measurable attributes show a variation Spread of Sizes = Normal Distribution
Normal Distribution • The spread or ‘width’ of the curve has a precise mathematical meaning - Variance • The greater the variance the wider the curve • Definedby a parameter called the standard deviation
Normal Distribution Calculation of standard distribution (sigma) -measured sizes of a sample of parts y1,y2…etc are the measured values of the sample is the average value N is the number of samples taken
(each value – mean average)² + number of values (6.5 - 7.54)² + (8.2 – 7.54)² + (8.5 – 7.54)² + (7.5 – 7.54)² + (7 – 7.54)² 5 Normal Distribution Sharpen 5 pencils to a length of 8 mm Mean average = 7.54 Sigma = SIGMA= 0.73
Normal Distribution • If sigma is known then we know that: • 95% of parts will lie within +/- 2σ of the mean • 99.74% of parts will lie within +/- 3σ of the mean
Control Charts • Used to establish the control limits for a process • Used to monitor the process to show when it is out of control • X-bar Chart (Mean Charts) • R Charts (Range Charts)
Control Charts Process Mean = Mean of Sample Means Upper control limit (UCL) = Process mean+3 sigma Lower control limit (LCL) = Process mean-3 sigma
Control Charts – X-bar Charts 1. Record measurements from a number of samples sets (4 or 5)
Control Charts – X-bar Charts 2. Calculate the mean of each sample set
Control Charts – X-bar Charts 3. Calculate the process mean (mean of sample means)
Control Charts – X-bar Charts • 4. Calculate UCL and LCL • UCL = process mean + 3σsample • LCL = process mean - 3σsample • The standard deviation σsample of the sample means • where n is the sample size (3 temperature readings) • σ = process standard deviation (4.2 degrees) • σsample =
Control Charts – X-bar Charts • 4. Calculate UCL and LCL • UCL = process mean + 3σsample • LCL = process mean - 3σsample • σsample • UCL = 211 + 3(2.42) = 218.27 degrees • LCL = 211 – 3(2.42) = 203.72 degrees
Control Charts – X-bar Charts UCL = 218.27 LCL = 203.72
Control Charts – X-bar Charts Interpreting control charts: Process out of control Last data point is out of control – indicates definite problem to be addressed immediately as defective products are being made.
Control Charts – X-bar Charts Interpreting control charts: Process in control Process still in control but there is a steady increase toward the UCL. There may be a possible problem and it should be investigated.
Control Charts – X-bar Charts Interpreting control charts: Process in control All data points are all above the process mean. This suggests some non-random influence on the process that should be investigated.
Control Charts – Range Charts The range is the difference between the largest and smallest values in a sample. Range is used to measure the process variation 1. Record measurements from a set of samples
Control Charts – Range Charts 2. Calculate the range = highest – lowest reading
Control Charts – Range Charts 3. Calculate UCL and LCL UCL = D4 x Raverage LCL = D3 xRaverage UCL = 2.57 x 13 = 33.41 degrees LCL = 0 x 13 = 0 degrees
Control Charts – Range Charts UCL R average LCL
Process Capability • Matches the natural variation in a process to the size requirements (tolerance) imposed by the design • Filling a box with washers: • exact number not in all boxes • upper limit set • lower limit set
Process Not Capable Process not capable: a lot of boxes will be over and under filled Normal distribution > specifications Cannot achieve tolerances all of the time
Process Capable Process capable: However there will still be a small number of defective parts Normal distribution is similar to specifications Tolerances will be met most of the time
Process Capable Process capable: No defective parts Normal distribution < specifications Tolerances will be met all the time
Process Capability Index • If Cp =1 • Process is capable • i.e. 99.97% of the natural variation of the process will be within the acceptable limits
Process Capability Index • If Cp > 1 • Process is capable. • i.e. very few defects will be found – less than three per thousand, often much less
Process Capability Index • If Cp <1 • Process is NOT capable • i.e. the natural variation in the process will cause outputs that are outside the acceptable limits.
Statistical Process Control Is doing things right 99% of the time good enough? 13 major accidents at Heathrow Airport every 2 days 5000 incorrect surgical procedures per week ……………… Pharmaceutical company producing 1 000 000 tablets a week, 99% quality would mean tablets would be defective! 10 000 Process of maintaining high quality standards is called : Quality Assurance Modern manufacturing companies often aim for a target of only 3 in a million defective parts. The term six sigma is used to describe quality at this level
Sampling • Size of Sample? • Sufficient to allow accurate assessment of process • More – does not improve accuracy • Less – reduced confidence in result
Sampling Size of Sample S = sample size e = acceptable error - as a proportion of std. deviation z = number relating to degree of confidence in the result
Sampling • Example – find mean value for weight of a packet of sugar • with a confidence of 95% • acceptable error of 10% • Weight of packet of sugar = 1000g • Process standard deviation = 10g
Sampling • z = 1.96 from the table • e = 0.1 (i.e.10%) • Therefore the sample size s = (1.96 / 0.1)2 • Therefore s = 384.16 • Sample size = 385
Sampling • Assume mean weight = 1005g • Sigma = 10g • Therefore error = 10g + 10% = 11g • Result: • 95% confident average weight of all packets of sugar
QC, QA and TQM • Quality Control: • emerged during the 1940s and 1950s • increase profit and reduce cost by the inspection of product quality. • inspect components after manufacture • reject or rework any defective components • Disadvantages: • just detects non-conforming products • does not prevent defects happening • wastage of material and time on scrapped and reworked parts inspection process not foolproof • possibility of non-conforming parts being shipped by mistake
QC, QA and TQM • Quality Assurance • Set up a quality system • documented approach to all procedures and processes that affect quality • prevention and inspection is a large part of the process • all aspects of the production process are involved • system accredited using international standards
QC, QA and TQM • Total Quality Management • International competition during the 1980s and 1990s • Everybody in the organisation is involved • Focussed on needs of the customer through teamwork • The aim is ‘zero defect’ production
Just-In-Time Manufacture Modern products – shortened life cycle Manufacturer – pressure for quick response Quick turnaround - hold inventory of stock Holding inventory costs money for storage Inventory items obsolete before use New approach: Just-In-Time Manufacture
Just-In-Time Manufacture • Underlying concept: Eliminate waste. • Minimum amount: • Materials • Parts • Space • Tools • Time • Suppliers are coordinated with manufacturing company.