1 / 30

Public Symposium on LNG Bowdoin College Brunswick, Maine

Public Symposium on LNG Bowdoin College Brunswick, Maine. Office of Energy Projects - Functions. OEP has the engineering and environmental expertise to: certificate new gas pipeline projects Authorize LNG terminals license and monitor hydroelectric projects, and

edie
Télécharger la présentation

Public Symposium on LNG Bowdoin College Brunswick, Maine

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Public Symposium on LNGBowdoin CollegeBrunswick, Maine

  2. Office of Energy Projects - Functions • OEP has the engineering and environmental expertise to: • certificate new gas pipeline projects • Authorize LNG terminals • license and monitor hydroelectric projects, and • analyze energy infrastructure needs and policies. • OEP focuses on: • project siting and development, • balancing environmental and other concerns, • ensuring compliance, • safeguarding the public, and • providing infrastructure capacity information.

  3. NPC Study • Align the conflicting policies • Policies that encourage consumption • Policies that inhibit gas supply

  4. Gas Facts • Natural gas is the economic/ environmental fuel of choice. • 96% of natural gas reserves are outside North America. • 25% of World natural gas consumption occurs in the US.

  5. Historic and ProjectedUS Gas Productionand Consumption Source: EIA AEO 2004

  6. Some Production AreasAre Not Accessible * Approximately 29 TCF Of The Rockies Gas Resources Are Closed To Development and 108 Tcf Are Available With Restrictions. Source: NPC

  7. What is the answer? Imports • Imports must make up the difference between domestic production and consumption • Delivered in two ways: • Gaseous form by pipeline • Liquid form by tanker (LNG)

  8. NORTH AMERICA RESERVES 4% WORLD PROVED RESERVES 2002: 6,270 TCF How Much Natural GasIs Out There? Global LNG Supply Facilities Global LNG Supply Existing Under Construction Proposed • LNG supply growing • Multiple LNG supply proposals announced • Long term LNG supply outlook robust Source: Cedigaz, NPC 8 Office of Energy Projects

  9. LNG Importsby Country Source: EIA

  10. FERC Economic Oversight – Access to LNG Terminal Liquid to Vapor Flow LNG Buyers A LNG Suppliers B B Open Access At Delivery of Vapor into Interstate Pipeline System A Open Access At Delivery of Liquid to Terminal 10 Office of Energy Projects

  11. Benefits of theNew LNG Policy • Stimulates development of new LNG terminals • Accommodates various business models • Increases gas supplies to the U.S. • Maintains FERC’s responsibility for environmental and safety reviews.

  12. FERC Existing Terminals with Approved Expansions A. Everett, MA : 1.035 Bcfd (Tractebel – DOMAC) B. Cove Point, MD : 1.0 Bcfd (Dominion – Cove Point LNG) C. Elba Island, GA : 1.2 Bcfd (El Paso – Southern LNG) D. Lake Charles, LA : 1.2 Bcfd (Southern Union – Trunkline LNG) Approved Terminals 1. Hackberry, LA : 1.5 Bcfd, (Sempra Energy) 2. Port Pelican: 1.6 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco) 3. Bahamas : 0.84 Bcfd, (AES Ocean Express)* 4. Gulf of Mexico: 0.5 Bcfd, (El Paso Energy Bridge GOM, LLC) 5. Bahamas : 0.83 Bcfd, (Calypso Tractebel)* 6. Freeport, TX : 1.5 Bcfd, (Cheniere/Freeport LNG Dev.) Proposed Terminals and Expansions – FERC 7. Fall River, MA : 0.8 Bcfd, (Weaver's Cove Energy/Hess LNG) 8. Long Beach, CA : 0.7 Bcfd, (Mitsubishi/ConocoPhillips – Sound Energy Solutions) 9. Corpus Christi, TX : 2.6 Bcfd, (Cheniere LNG Partners) 10. Sabine, LA : 2.6 Bcfd (Cheniere LNG) 11. Corpus Christi, TX : 1.0 Bcfd (Vista Del Sol - ExxonMobil) 12. Sabine, TX : 1.0 Bcfd (Golden Pass - ExxonMobil) 13. Logan Township, NJ : 1.2 Bcfd (Crown Landing LNG – BP) 14. Lake Charles, LA: 0.6 Bcfd (Southern Union – Trunkline LNG) 15. Bahamas : 0.5 Bcfd, (Seafarer - El Paso/FPL ) 16. Corpus Christi, TX: 1.0 Bcfd (Occidental Energy Ventures) 17.Providence, RI : 0.5 Bcfd (Keyspan & BG LNG) 18. Port Arthur, TX: 1.5 Bcfd (Sempra) Proposed Terminals – Coast Guard 19. California Offshore: 1.5 Bcfd (Cabrillo Port – BHP Billiton) 20. Louisiana Offshore : 1.0 Bcfd (Gulf Landing – Shell) 21. So. California Offshore : 0.5 Bcfd, (Crystal Energy) 22. Louisiana Offshore : 1.0 Bcfd (Main Pass McMoRan Exp.) 23. Gulf of Mexico: n/a (Compass Port - ConocoPhillips) 24. Gulf of Mexico : 2.8 Bcfd (Pearl Crossing - ExxonMobil) Planned Terminals and Expansions 25. Brownsville, TX : n/a, (Cheniere LNG Partners) 26. Mobile Bay, AL: 1.0 Bcfd, (ExxonMobil) 27. Somerset, MA : 0.65 Bcfd (Somerset LNG) 28. Belmar, NJ Offshore : n/a (El Paso Global) 29. Altamira, Tamulipas : 1.12 Bcfd, (Shell) 30. Baja California, MX : 1.0 Bcfd, (Sempra & Shell) 31. Baja California - Offshore : 1.4 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco) 32. California - Offshore : 0.75 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco) 33. St. John, NB : 0.5 Bcfd, (Canaport – Irving Oil) 34. Point Tupper, NS 1.0 Bcf/d (Bear Head LNG - Access Northeast Energy) 35. Pleasant Point, ME : 0.5 Bcf/d (Quoddy Bay, LLC) 36. Quebec City, QC : 0.5 Bcfd (Project Rabaska - Enbridge/Gaz Met/Gaz de France) 37. Lázaro Cárdenas, MX : 0.5 Bcfd (Tractebel/Repsol) 38. Mobile Bay, AL: 1.0 Bcfd (Cheniere LNG Partners) 39. St. Helens, OR: 0.7 Bcfd (Port Westward LNG LLC) 40. Cove Point, MD : 0.8 Bcfd (Dominion) 41. Puerto Libertad, MX: 1.3 Bcfd (Sonora Pacific LNG) 42. Offshore Boston, MA: 0.8 Bcfd (Northeast Gateway – Excelerate Energy) 43. Kitimat, BC: 0.34 Bcfd (Galveston LNG) 44. Prince Rupert, BC: 0.30 Bcfd (WestPac Terminals) *US pipeline approved; LNG terminal pending in Bahamas Existing and Proposed North American LNG Terminals 44 43 36 34 33 35 39 A 42 17 27 7 28 13 B 40 19 8 21 C 32 30 26 15 18 31 D 1 38 10 3 5 41 14 6 12 23 9 24 16 22 11 4 25 2 20 US Jurisdiction FERC US Coast Guard 29 37 July 2004 Office of Energy Projects

  13. Maximum LNGDeliverability Growth

  14. US Natural Gas Balance

  15. LNG TerminalSiting Issues • Safety • Take Away Capacity • Local acceptance • Federal and State approvals

  16. Safety • Proximity to residential and commercial areas raises public safety concerns • Exclusion zones • DOT/OPS enforces security. • FERC performs pre- and post-certificate reviews of LNG terminals • Biennial reviews continue for life of terminal. • Coast Guard enforces offshore ship safety

  17. Takeaway Capacity • Is there an existing pipeline with takeaway capacity? • Does the project require new pipeline construction? • NEPA requires an analysis of the cumulative effects. • Can not have an LNG terminal without takeaway capacity

  18. Local Acceptance • Has the project sponsor interacted with the local population? • Entertain concerns • Make adjustments or accommodations to the project.

  19. Federal and StateApprovals • Must get approvals: • FERC – NGA Approval • DOT/OPS – Exclusion Zones • Coast Guard – Vessel Operating Plan • Corps of Engineers – Dredging, Wetland Filling, Alternative Sites • NMFS, FWS – Endangered Species Act • Coastal Zone Consistency Determination • State Agency Requirements

  20. Primary federal authorization processes for LNG terminals • FERC Review Process • Pre-Filing Process • Coast Guard Process

  21. FERC Review Process Public Notice Data Gathering/Analysis DEIS Public Meeting Final EIS Commission Order

  22. Traditional vs. Pre-Filing Process Develop Study Corridor File At FERC Announce Open Season Prepare Resource Reports Traditional - Applicant Conduct Scoping Issue Draft EIS Issue Final EIS Issue Order Traditional - FERC Announce Open Season Develop Study Corridor File At FERC Prepare Resource Reports Pre-Filing - Applicant Conduct Scoping Review Draft Resource Reports & Prepare DEIS Issue Draft EIS Issue Final EIS Issue Order Pre-Filing - FERC 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (months)

  23. Benefits of Pre-Filing • More interactive NEPA process, no shortcuts • Earlier, more direct involvement by FERC, other agencies, landowners • Goal of “no surprises” • Time savings realized only if we are working together with stakeholders • FERC staff is an advocate of the Process, not the Project!

  24. The FERC Process: We Issue Notice of the Application Project Sponsor Sends Landowner Notification Package SCOPING = We Issue Notice of Intent to Prepare the NEPA Document Public Meeting(s) Public Input: File an Intervention Contact the project sponsor w/questions, concerns; contact FERC Send letters expressing concerns about environmental impact Attend scoping meetings Opportunities forPublic Involvement

  25. The FERC Process: Issue Notice of Availability of the DEIS Public Meetings on DEIS Issue a Commission Order Public Input: File comments on the adequacy of DEIS Attend public meetings to give comments on DEIS Interveners can file a request for Rehearing of a Commission Order Opportunities for PublicInvolvement

  26. Maritime Security Actof 2002 (November 2002) • Amendment of the Deepwater Port Act of 1974 • Transferred jurisdiction of offshore natural gas facilities from FERC to Maritime Admin-istration and Coast Guard • Lowers Regulatory Hurdles • No requirement for open access to terminal • Decision required within 365 days

  27. LNG – Where the Action Is • What is FERC Doing? • New LNG Branch at FERC to focus on and enhance LNG review, inspection programs • Provide for Seamless Review of LNG Facilities • Interagency Agreement on Safety and Security • Development of FERC Model for LNG Tanker Release Consequences • Participating in Conferences/Seminars/Tours

  28. The FERC Staff Studyand Its Positive Impacts • A number of studies gave rise to controversy • FERC contracted with ABSG to identify models • Gives FERC the ability to do more site specific modeling and reviews in EISs • Provides a solid theoretical foundation from which to build on as new information becomes available • Assumptions in the study are conservative

  29. LNG Supply Stream -- From Production to Distribution Natural Gas Pipelines Dock Dock Natural Gas Production Storage and Vaporization Facility Liquefaction and Storage Facility

  30. Outlook/Issues Associatedwith LNG Development • States attempting to assert economic jurisdiction in the post-Hackberry environment • Public safety information • Interchangeability • Importance of timing

More Related