90 likes | 199 Vues
In her presentation on March 30-31, 2009, Sarah Pearson discusses the evolving landscape of library collections, emphasizing the shift to web-based resources while maintaining hybrid collections. Research libraries must adapt to course content changes and negotiate better value through national deals. Despite challenges such as technology access issues and licensing complexities, the benefits of e-resources include expanded access and ease of usage analysis. Pearson highlights the importance of feedback and the need for continual negotiation in collection development strategies.
E N D
Moving to e-only from a library perspective Sarah Pearson30th and 31st March 2009
Collection development principles • Web based resources are the preferred medium • Research libraries will continue to maintain hybrid collections for the foreseeable future • Budgets are designed to be responsive to changes in course contents and research directions • Negotiate greater value for money (eg through national deals)
Some statistics from UoB • 24,000 free and subscribed e-journals • 1,000 e-resources (340 subscribed) • 4,000 e-books • eLibrary service - 70,000 logins per month • 2300 print only journals
Benefits of electronic (Users) • Opening up the collection • E-delivery adds value • The big deal
Benefits of electronic (libraries) • Ease space problems in print collections • Easier to analyse usage • Necessity – publisher format shift
What are theproblems? • Does technology exclude some users? • Licensing and authentication complexity • Complexity of access entitlements • VAT • More time consuming to administer
What are theproblems? • Lack of control over collection development • Differing departmental priorities • Ownership • Preservation
Learning Points • Don’t expect to go completely e-only! • Usage is an important tool but don’t forget about feedback • Big deals have benefits but there are also trade-offs • Negotiate. Negotiate. Negotiate.
Thank You! s.pearson.1@bham.ac.uk Any Questions?