1 / 29

K - - p “atom” identified as L (1405)

“ Resonant formation of the K - p quasi-bound state in stopped-K - absorption in 4 He, 3 He and d : Experimental test of the Λ(1405) vs Λ(1420) Ansatz “ Toshimitsu Yamazaki, Jafar Esmaili and Yoshinori Akaishi at ECT* October 15, 2009. K - - p “atom” identified as L (1405).

efia
Télécharger la présentation

K - - p “atom” identified as L (1405)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. “Resonant formation of the K-p quasi-bound state in stopped-K- absorption in 4He, 3He and d: Experimental test of the Λ(1405) vs Λ(1420) Ansatz“Toshimitsu Yamazaki, JafarEsmaili and Yoshinori Akaishiat ECT* October 15, 2009

  2. K- - p“atom” identified as L(1405) fundamental building block of Kbar nuclear condensed matter • Strongly attractive K- - p -> deep and strong binding • Molecular nature of K-pp • Evolution of K- nuclear systems * Superstrong nuclear force -> Kaon condensation • All depend on the • L(1405) AnsatzValid ?

  3. Alternative scenario: L*(1420) 2-pole Ansatz -> shallow and weak binding regime

  4. Avoid confusing prejudices and wishful thinking: Robust experimental signature: urgently called for L*=K-p as a Feshbach resonance Coupled channels 1: Kbar N 2: S p For a given M: --> s11, s12, s22 Single-pole or double-pole ? More Confusion: T21 or T22 ?

  5. KN->Sp invariant mass spectra 2: Sp 1: KN Arbitrary unit KbarN missing mass spectrum Sp->Sp invariant mass spectra Escape of K Conversion s1/2[MeV] L(1405) L(1420) Characteristics of T22 : rising above KbarN threshold

  6. COSY-ANKEp + p -> K+ + Y0 + p-> S0+ p0 -> L + g + p0HADESFOPI

  7. Hemmingway S+(1660) -> (Sp)0+ p+ • Zychor pp -> K+ (S0p0)p DD91, Hyodo-Weise use T22 Sp -> Sp without justification Serious discrepancy above the KbarN threshold

  8. Interpretation of Zychor’s data SPECTRAL SHAPE Realistic treatment * Sp emission threshold * K- + p threshold CAUTION !! For a broad resonance the apparent peak position deviates downward M~1406 G~40 most likely, but Need more statistics !

  9. Is this a L(1405) peak? No! It is a quasi-free peak Discovery of L(1405): Alston et al. (1961)K- + p -> (Sp)0 + p+ + p- New problem raised: Is it true?! No, not true Stopped K- in 4He (Sp)0 (Sp)+-

  10. arXiv: _0906.0505 • Resonant formation (nuclear tuning) K- + “p”L* S + pgoverned byT21 K- + “p” S + p(quasi-free) constrained by spectator momentum arXiv:0909.2573

  11. M [MeV/c2] Free Inv.-mass Th. Proj. Inv.-mass Th.  partial invariant-mass spectra

  12. S orbit abs. G. Pot. =35 MeV 2 M* (MeV/c2) 2 ,s :  invariant-mass spectra

  13. d target: small and large momentum components Resonant formation of L(1405) distinctly visible

  14. Hyodo-Weise (chiral) Akaishi-Yamazaki (phenom) MSp[MeV/c2] Sp invariant-mass spectrum from stopped K- onD

  15. No effect of the 2nd pole:T21 dominanceonly the 1st pole is relevant

  16. Two-pole form of L(1405) J. Revai & N.V. Shevchenko, Phys. Rev. C 79 (2009) 035202 Sp invariant-mass spectrum from stopped K- onD C3G pot. 2nd pole effect is negligible ! one pole A-Y 1410-64 R-S One-pole R-S Two-pole MSp[MeV/c2] 2nd pole 1st pole No visible effect of the 2nd pole

  17. How can we determine ?Simulation stopped K- on dExperimental design-> J-PARC ProposalT. Suzuki et al.

  18. Chi2 analysis of simulation data

  19. In-flight K-d -> (Sp) n

  20. K lab= 5 MeV/c 1420 1405 Resonant QF 80 MeV/c 120 MeV/c 160 MeV/c Stopped kaon does not provide a good set up to learn about L(1405). 200 MeV/c covers! Non-resonant QF All are normalized to 1 M(Sp) [MeV/c2] Low-momentum K-+D reaction QF Spectator process dominates! K lab= 200 MeV/c D. Jido, E. Oset & T. Sekihara, Eur. Phys. J. K lab= 120 MeV/c X K lab= 5 MeV/c Projection spectra of 3-body Dalitz

  21. No effect of the 2nd pole:T21 dominanceonly the 1st pole is relevant

  22. decreases! cf. P. Kienle, Y. Akaishi & T. Yamazaki, Phys. Lett. B 632 (2006) 187 Dalitz plot for spectator process O. Braun et al., Nucl. Phys. B 124 (1977) 45 QF Cusp M(Lp) [MeV/c2] S(1385) L(1405) M(Lp) [MeV/c2] M(Sp) [MeV/c2]

  23. JOS ascribed the component around M~1400 to S*(1385) to conclude L*(1420) • More statistics necessary: • A proposed experiment at J-PARC

  24. No conclusive results on L(1405) yet, but many promising experiments NEAR FUTURE EXPERIMENTS Highly Awaited K- + d K-p + nMM (n) KEK, both at rest and in-flightK- + 3He  K-p + dMM (d) AMADEUS, at rest, J-PARC p + p K+ + (Sp) + p HADES

  25. Thank you very much

More Related