1 / 48

Project III

“Bach2 represses plasma cell gene regulatory network in B cells to promote antibody class Switch”, Muto et al., EMBO, 2010 Review the evidence for the interaction network after rendering it in BioTapestry .

efia
Télécharger la présentation

Project III

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. “Bach2 represses plasma cell gene regulatory network in B cells to promote antibody class Switch”, Muto et al., EMBO, 2010 • Review the evidence for the interaction network after rendering it in BioTapestry. • Interpret the ODE’s in physical terms, and show under what parameter conditions does the model work. • Is this reasonable or completely ad hoc? (This problem will require simulations) Magdalena Koziol Molly Megraw Mitra Mojtahedi Jiyang Yu Project III

  2. B cell development B cell Pax5 Antigen (LPS) Absence of Antigen B cell Class switch recombination (CSR) Pax5 Pax5 Antibody-secreting cells (ASC) Isotope switched Plasma cell Blimp1 Plasma cell Blimp1

  3. Prior to this paper, people focused on this network: Signal

  4. EVIDENCE FOR GRN Bach2: -B cell specific TF -Express high in B cells -Down regulate in plasma cells -It is downstream of Pax5 -It is activated by Pax5 -It represses Blimp1 Pax5 Bach2: qPCR analysis of expression of Pax5 in Bach2-/- Bach2 Blimp1: Blimp1 GFP reporter mice Blimp1 Bach2: Rescue of Bach2-/- phenotype by Blimp1-/- Blimp1 Pax5: qPCR analysis of expression of Pax5 in Blimp1-/- Bach2 CSR: Bach2-/- cells do not undergo CSR

  5. B Cell State

  6. Class Switch State

  7. Plasma Cell State

  8. Network model The authors focus on Pax5, Bach2, Blimp-1 interaction They observe that the presence of Bach2 causes a delay in Pax5 downregulation They use a set of ordinary differential equations to model the system- does model simulation address the time delay?

  9. Their Kinetic Model

  10. They removed Blimp-1 in the model

  11. Reproducing their simulation

  12. Wait a second… Put mRNA expression of those three genes in Figure 5B

  13. What if Blimp1=1 at t=0?

  14. Different initial conditions

  15. Different initial conditions Their model only works when Blimp1 is > Bach2 at t=0!

  16. Their steady state analysis: Parameters not realistic

  17. More Problems • Two sets of parameters before and after 24h • Some of the parameter values are questionable, i.e. C2=2.441e-7, Ns=12 before 24h So, their model is PROBLEMATIC!

  18. Is there a way to make the model correct?

  19. Is there a way to make the model correct?

  20. Our Proposed Model A Equation (3’) is from

  21. It’s working with correct initial conditions Put mRNA expression of those three genes in Figure 5B

  22. Steady State Analysis 3.2 Blimp-1=1 3.2 Blimp-1=1 3.6 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 3.6

  23. Robustness of Our ModelSensitivity of Parameters: Nr

  24. Conclusions • Bach2 is required for CSR, and causes a time-delay of plasma cell differentiation upon antigen stimulations • Their mathematical model isPROBLEMATIC • Only works when Blimp1 > Bach2 at time 0 • Inconsistent parameters with steady state analysis of Pax5 • Two parameter sets before and after 24h • Our proposed model A explains all the observations • The GRN of the negative feedback loop via Bach2 is REASONABLEfor the time-delay of Blimp-1 induction

  25. If you need the simulation codes, send me an email: jy2322@c2b2.columbia.edu.Thanks for THE BEST EVER class of GRNs !!!

  26. Back up slides

  27. Simulation Outline • Model in the paper: negative feedback via Bach2 • Our proposed Model A • Double Negative Feedback Loop • Double Positive Feedback Loop • Our proposed Model B • Our proposed Model C

  28. W/ Antigen: a Negative Feedback Loop via Bach2

  29. Correct Steady State Plots for their Model Blimp-1=1 1.5 3.2 2.0 3.6

  30. Our proposed model A: Blimp1 will not go to Infinity

  31. Robustness of Our ModelSensitivity of Parameters: C2

  32. Double Negative Feedback Loop in B Cell (Toggle Switch)

  33. Double Positive Feedback Loop in Plasma Cell

  34. What’s wrong with Toggle Switch to regulate CSR? • Pax5 knock-down has no effects on CSR

  35. Alternative Model B This model is similar to our Model I as restricting maximum Blimp1 level and will work similarly. Model is coded up, but we need a few more hours to optimize parameters and run simulations !

  36. Alternative Model C to Test No direct evidence to support Blimp1 Bach2, but the model with it works well To test: Removing it might work as well Or other factors connecting Blimp1 and Bach2

  37. Detailed evidences for their GRN interactions

  38. Bach2 represses Blimp1 Evidence: Blimp-1 GFP reporter Increase % of plasma cells in Bach2-/-

  39. Bach2 seems to delay Blimp1 activation Evidence: In Bach2-/- B cells, expression of Blimp1 increases faster Closed triangle: Bac2-/- Open circle: Bac2+/+

  40. Bach2 seems to prevent plasma cells Evidence: Relationship between cell division and plasma cells (marker CD138) Triangle: Bach2-/-

  41. Rescue of Bach2-/- phenotype by Blimp1-/- Evidence: IgG1 & IgG3 are markers for isotope switch Isotope switch inhibited in Bach2-/- Isotontpe switch rescued by Blimp1 double muta

  42. Regulatory network Further evidence: what Regulates what, and if positive or negative regulation mRNA level mRNA level mRNA level

  43. Network components transcription during B cell to plasma transition Evidence: Level of network components during B cell to plasma cell transition

More Related