1 / 13

FEMA Region III Storm Surge Project

FEMA Region III Storm Surge Project. Return Level Results and Historical Comparison. FEMA Region III Coastal Workshop USACE- Field Research Facility November 1, 2011. Michael Forte USACE-ERDC. Advancements. 2010 Finite Grid 30-40m Minimum Resolution. 1978 Triangular Finite Grid

ella
Télécharger la présentation

FEMA Region III Storm Surge Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FEMA Region III Storm Surge Project Return Level Results and Historical Comparison FEMA Region III Coastal Workshop USACE- Field Research Facility November 1, 2011 Michael Forte USACE-ERDC

  2. Advancements 2010 Finite Grid 30-40m Minimum Resolution 1978 Triangular Finite Grid 5-10km resolution

  3. FEMA Tropical & Extratropical 100yr Return Levels • Delaware Bay, Eastern Shore of VA • and Southern Chesapeake Bay • (Norfolk & Tidewater VA) • contain the highest surge levels • throughout Region III. • Lowest return levels at Middle • Chesapeake Bay All UNITS ARE IN US FEET

  4. 100Yr Historical Return Levels Still Water Elevation (SWEL) Compiled by Dewberry from multiple Flood Insurance Studies throughout Region III Sources: USACE – Potomac (DC area) VIMS – Majority of Chesapeake Bay NWS- Hydro (Gauge analysis) USGS – (WL Gauge analysis) Grenier Engineering (WLGauge analysis) Compare existing/historical with Region III 100yr results

  5. 100Yr SWEL Comparison FEMA R3 minus Historical • Majority of values +/- 1 foot when • Compared to Historical Study • Elevated Return Levels in Delaware • Bay and Lower Chesapeake (Norfolk) • (+ 1.5 – 3.5 ft) • Decreased Return Levels in upper • Chesapeake Bay and VA Eastern Shore • (- 1.5 – 3.5ft) • Overall good agreement with a couple of important differences

  6. SWEL Comparison Scatter Plot of Region III and Historical SWEL values

  7. Why the changes? • Storm track • Historical gauge analysis • Historical Studies for Delaware Bay • were based on gauge analysis with very few to no tropical systems occurring. • Tropical Storm tracks –winds drive • water South down the Chesapeake Bay • Delaware Bay acts as a catch basin • with few tributaries allowing water • to pile up.

  8. Why the changes? • Storm track • Historical gauge analysis • Historical Studies for Delaware Bay • were based on gauge analysis with very few to no tropical systems occurring. • Tropical Storm tracks –winds drive • water South down the Chesapeake Bay • Delaware Bay acts as a catch basin • with few tributaries allowing water • to pile up.

  9. Why the changes? • Storm track • Historical gauge analysis • Historical Studies for Delaware Bay • were based on gauge analysis with very few to no tropical systems occurring. • Tropical Storm tracks –winds drive • water South down the Chesapeake Bay • Delaware Bay acts as a catch basin • with few tributaries allowing water • to pile up.

  10. Region II & Region III 100Yr Level Comparison Region II 100Yr Modeled Output Region II Modeled output compared With Region III

  11. Region II & Region III 100Yr Level Comparison Another Encouraging Result! • Majority of points are within +/- 1 foot. • Two modeled outputs from two • different teams, run on two different computers = VERY GOOD • AGREEMENT

  12. Region III minus Region II Histogram

  13. FEMA Region III Storm Surge Project Summary/Conclusions • Excellent agreement with historical SWELS with a few important differences • Region II Compares well with Region III

More Related