1 / 21

Project Management Update

Project Management Update. NCI Steering Committee Meeting July 30, 2003 Minneapolis, MN. Participating NCI States (FY03). NH. ME. WA. VT. ND. AK. ND. MT. MA. MN. OR. NY. WI. SD. RI. ID. MI. CT. WY. PA. NJ. IA. OH. DE. NE. NV. IN. IL. DC. WV. UT. VA. MD. CO.

ehren
Télécharger la présentation

Project Management Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project Management Update NCI Steering Committee Meeting July 30, 2003 Minneapolis, MN

  2. Participating NCI States (FY03) NH ME WA VT ND AK ND MT MA MN OR NY WI SD RI ID MI CT WY PA NJ IA OH DE NE NV IN IL DC WV UT VA MD CO CA MO KS KY NC HI TN SC OK AR AZ NM Orange County MS GA AL LA TX FL PR

  3. Interested Participants… • NCI participation proposed in three Real Choices System Change grants • Montana • North Dakota • Washington D.C. • State of California plans to join after one-year ramp up period

  4. Status of Phase V (FY2003)Data Submission

  5. New Website: www.hsri.org/nci Highlights… • New “Join NCI” page has updated introductory materials • Reports page re-organized • Presentations posted on separate page • “NCI Tools” • State contact info, web links, state reports • Separate section on interviewer training • Separate section for meeting minutes

  6. Consumer Survey • New survey forms, codebooks, Access file have been posted to website • Only minor technical revisions made • Subcommittee will convene over next few months to address more substantial revisions • Goal is to release new forms beginning of calendar year 2004 • Preliminary report – draft to be distributed this week

  7. Proposal for Data Access • Review proposal from Rebecca Tucker-Smith

  8. Summary of State Profile Responses

  9. How is NCI data used? • Setting goals & strategic planning • Setting priorities for quality improvement, incorporate into Quality Management plans • Budget requests to Governor and legislators • Helps shape data reporting systems (e.g., incidents, mortality) • Stakeholder advisory committees (Quality Councils) being formed to review results and make recommendations to state agencies

  10. How are results disseminated? • Many states compile reports of state results vs. national results and post on websites • Some states beginning to look at provider level results & share with providers • Summaries shared with families who filled out surveys (AZ) • Simplified version of Consumer Survey report for self-advocates (VT)

  11. What have other states added? • Family survey questions: • Fair hearing/complaint process (RCOC) • Service coordinator turnover (RCOC) • Early start (0-3) survey (RCOC) • Support needs and future planning (CT) • Consumer survey questions: • Assistive technology (DE) • Case management supplement (WA, HI, MA, IN, WY) • Person-centered planning, additional health data (HI) • Modified for people with chronic mental illness (IA) • Health status supplement (NC)

  12. What areas are states interested in expanding or developing? • Additional health and safety indicators • Questions about self-directed services • Involvement of self-advocates • Risk management • Provider capacity • Provider performance measures • Modifications to adapt survey for people with different communication styles • Direct support worker salaries, benefits, credentialing • Crisis services

  13. Trend Analysis – Selected Results

  14. Trend Analysis • Beginning to look at trends over past three years • Five states collected Consumer Survey data annually for three years • Connecticut • Kentucky • North Carolina • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island

  15. CM helps get what person needs… 100% 90% 88% 83% 83% 90% 78% 78% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 5 state average All state average FY00 FY01 FY02

  16. Person is satisfied with home… 95% 94.4% 94% 93.6% 92.8% 93% 92% FY00 FY01 FY02

  17. Person had input in choosing… FY00 FY01 FY02 60% 40% 20% 0% Roommate Home staff Case manager

  18. Next Steps

  19. Goals for this year • Develop Core Health Status Supplement • Awarded grant from WV DD Council • Applied for CDC grant • Will incorporate work done by North Carolina • Quarterly e-newsletters for NASDDDS membership • Prepare .ppt templates for states to present results • Finalize revised set of Core Indicators • Summary of State Profiles

  20. Coming soon… • New “Trainer’s Guide” for Consumer Survey, with Powerpoint slides • Indicators and system data protocols will be updated following meeting and posted to website • Data Submission Forms for FY04…please fill out and return!

  21. Hot topics • NCI vs. PES • Crosswalk distributed and will be posted • Waiting for formal statement from CMS • Using Consumer & Family Survey data to look at outcomes by provider • Cautions around sample size and comparisons among providers (especially small providers) • Quality improvement vs. sanctions

More Related