1 / 15

State/EPA Environmental Information Exchange Network – Progress Report

State/EPA Environmental Information Exchange Network – Progress Report Presented by Melanie Morris, Network Steering Board Member February 28, 2004. CY 2004 Performance Measures. Focus on both building infrastructure and exchanging data Goal – Create critical mass by end of 2004

elias
Télécharger la présentation

State/EPA Environmental Information Exchange Network – Progress Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. State/EPA Environmental Information Exchange Network – Progress Report Presented by Melanie Morris, Network Steering Board Member February 28, 2004

  2. CY 2004 Performance Measures • Focus on both building infrastructure and exchanging data • Goal – Create critical mass by end of 2004 • 3 Measures with Specific Targets

  3. Flow Type Target No. Of States Flowing in CY04 FRS 20 PCS/IDEF 10 NEI 12 Beaches 7 RCRAInfo 10 SDWIS 10 Performance Goal 1 Success is defined as data flowing through to destination systems with no diminution of service. Targets by Flow

  4. Performance Goal 2 Success is defined as States that are capable of multiple flows (two or more) to partners. • Target: 10-14 States doing multiple flows by end of 2004

  5. Performance Goal 3 Success is defined as having the technical architecture in place by having partners establish fully functional Nodes. • Target: 35 Nodes by the end of 2004

  6. HOW DID WE DO???

  7. Performance Goal 1 Targets Summary: Exceeded FRS (new data to EPA) Lots of states ready for NEI in Spring 05 RCRAInfo and SDWIS – not available until end of CY2004 The only one that got easier was FRS *Only 1 of 2 modules can be processed by EPA ** PCS/IDEF is “scheduled” not available to all *** Only RCRAInfo Handler can be processed by EPA ****Available in December 2004

  8. Performance Goal 2: States with Multiple Flows • Met goal with 10 states with more than 1 data flow • OR: FRS, PNNWQX, NEI, Hazardous Waste Transporters (4) with RCRA Handler coming soon! • WA: FRS, PNNWQX, Hazardous Waste Transporters, Fish Tissue with DOH (4) • NJ: Beaches, FRS, NEI (3) with SDWIS coming soon • DE: Beaches, NEI, and PCS/IDEF (3) • NH: Beaches, RCRAInfo Handler, FRS (3)

  9. Performance Goal 2: States with Multiple Flows (cont’d) • Met goal with 10 states with more than 1 data flow (cont’d) • NY: FRS, SDWIS • MI: DMR, TRI • ME: SDWIS, FRS • MD: SDWIS, FRS • MS: FRS, RCRAInfo Handler

  10. Status of Network NodesDecember 31, 2004 – 31 Operational In Development Operational Not Yet Started WA MT ME VT ND OR OR MN NH NH ID WI SD NY MA AK MI WY RI CT IA PA PA NE NJ NV OH IN IL UT DE CO MD WV WV CA VA KS DC MO KY NC TN OK AZ NM NM NM SC AR HI GA AL MS MS TX LA FL FL

  11. Other things to Report • Reusable tools and software code developed and shared…. • Some demonstrated Node Configurations being downloaded and installed in 1 day. • States developed sharable XML Style sheets to convert drinking water lab data to SDWIS • States developed sharable Beach Monitoring web tools – Great Lakes States going to adopt • Looking at numbers: • Thousands of new FRS records at EPA (according to Pat) • New Partners: • States environmental agencies exchanging data for the first time • States giving access to their data to other State Departments (one gave a copy of their Node Client for the other department to use to do a Query off their Node)

  12. Year End Reflections • We fell short on the State to EPA data flows but we learned these were harder throughout the year • New data flows we weren’t expecting • Hazardous waste transporters across states • DEP/DEQ and DOH exchanges • If we make the tools (schema, and NFC) and rules available..the Network works • Proven by states being able to do flows quickly when these tools and Nodes are in place • Success in reaching ultimate goal of obtaining critical mass on the Exchange Network. • End of the year (last 2 months) momentum was great…states just didn’t get Nodes up but they started doing multiple flows.

  13. February 2005 Update • Nodes • Flows

  14. In Development Operational Not Yet Started Status of State Nodes - February 15, 2005 WA MT ME VT ND OR OR MN NH NH ID WI SD NY MA AK MI WY RI CT IA PA PA NE NJ NV OH IN IL UT DE CO MD WV WV CA VA KS DC MO KY NC TN OK AZ NM NM NM SC AR HI GA AL MS MS TX LA FL FL

  15. Development is in process NE DE MS TX NJ MA NM WA DE MS MI VA IA NJ OR WV Handler Module in Production Only MS DE KY MA OR PA NH WA LA NE IL ME NY MD Development is in process AL ME MT UT CT VA MN MD SD IA NY ND WA DE NC MO OR WV WI MS SC NH KS OH PA AZ CA CO ID IL IN MI NM NJ NE WA OR ID AK WA OR NH NJ ME VT RI IN SC VA MI DE NH CA NC NJ GA eDMR WI FL MI COLOR KEY In Development Operational LA WA DE AZ ME CT OR WV MI WI MS SC NH KS OH PA NE ID IL IN MD MA MN ND SD IA NV GA AL KY OK TX UT CA NJ NM NY MO MT NC AK VA WY VT CO Last Update Feb 17, 2005

More Related