1 / 78

The Discovery and Study of B Mesons in the CLEO Experiment

The Discovery and Study of B Mesons in the CLEO Experiment. Jeffrey D. Richman University of California, Santa Barbara. Symposium Celebrating CLEO and CESR, 31 May 2008. Outline. Terra incognita: Mapping the unknown territory of B physics in the CLEO I era

elina
Télécharger la présentation

The Discovery and Study of B Mesons in the CLEO Experiment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Discovery and Study of B Mesons in the CLEO Experiment Jeffrey D. Richman University of California, Santa Barbara Symposium Celebrating CLEO and CESR, 31 May 2008

  2. Outline • Terra incognita: Mapping the unknown territory of B physics in the CLEO I era • CLEO II & CLEO II.V: the right stuff • The march of the penguins • The elegant simplicity of semileptonic decays • The triumph of hadronic decays • The success of the CLEO program as a scientific enterprise My apologies for not covering all the important measurements and papers. I had to leave out a lot of them!

  3. Terra Incognita: Mapping the New Territory of B Physics in the CLEO I Era [1977: discovery of Y states at FNAL] courtesy Karl Berkelman

  4. Y(1S), Y(2S), Y(3S), and... discovery of the Y(4S)! (1980) large decay width s(Y(4S)) vs. s(continuum) “Evidence for New Flavor Production at the Y(4S)” (1981) Y(4S) as a fountain of BB pairs  can study weak decays! Inclusive single-lepton final state as signature of weak decay; issues of continuum background & event shape variables; off-resonance running Inclusive properties of B Decay Critical milestone: observation of fully reconstructed hadronic decays (1983) Physics themes of the early CLEO I era

  5. 1.09 pb-1 (scan) s (nb)vs. ECM (GeV) Scan 10.46—10.64 GeV • Mass: M(1S)+(1112 +/- 5) MeV  M(4S) = (10572 +/- 5 MeV) PDG: M(4S) = (10579.4 +/ 1.2 MeV) • Width: G = (19.9 +/- 5.5 +/- 5 ) MeV • s(res)/s(non-res) = 1/3 • Event shape: more spherical than jet- like; R2 used from the beginning! ECM R2<0.3

  6. 2.5 pb-1 (scan) 76 electron events total! Predicted spectrum assuming D*en/Den =1 pe > 1 GeV/c ECM

  7. Inclusive properties of B decays (1981-1983) • Decay of b-flavored Hadrons to Single-Muon and Dimuon Final States (1981) • Decay of B mesons into Charged and Neutral Kaons (1982) • Charged-Particle Multiplicities in B-Meson Decay (1982) • Semileptonic Decay of B Mesons (1983) • Ruling out Exotic Models of b Quark Decay (1983) • Observation of Exclusive Decay Modes of b-flavored Mesons (1983) • D0 spectrum from B-Meson Decay (1983) • Observation of Baryons in B-Meson Decay (1983) PRL 51, 634 (1983) f sideband

  8. 40.7 pb-1 “Until now, the b-flavored mesons themselves had not been found. Here we report that discovery.” Signal region D0 sidebands M(B0) 5274.2+/-1.9+/-2.0 MeV 5279.3+/-0.7 MeV PDG ‘06 M(B-) 5270.8+/-2.3+/-2.0 MeV 5279.1+/-0.5 MeV PDG ‘06 2 evts 5 evts 5 evts 6 evts wrong-sign combs Branching fractions a little high.

  9. 40.8 pb-1 (on res) • B(BD0X) = (0.8+/-0.2 +/- 0.2) • used B(D0 K-p+)=(3.0 +/- 0.6)% • update to B(D0 K-p+)=(3.8+/-0.07)% • B(BD0X)=(0.63+/-0.2+/-0.2) • PDG’06  (0.64+/-0.03) M(K-p+) vs. p on-res continuum

  10. Beyond the basics Observation of BFX PRL 56, 2781 (1986) • Limit on the bu coupling from Semileptonic B Decay (1984) • Upper Limit on Flavor-Changing Neutral-Current Decays of the b Quark (1984) • Two-Body Decays of B Mesons (1984) • Inclusive Decay of B Mesons into Charged D* (1985) • Observation of the Decay B0D*+r- (1985) • Decay By X (1985) • Inclusive f production in B-Meson Decay (1986) • Observation of the Decay BFX (1986) • Inclusive B-Meson Decay to Charm (1987) • Limits on Rare Exclusive Decays of B Mesons (1987) on-res+off-res on-res, p<2.5 GeV off-res, p<2.5 GeV 10

  11. 117 pb-1 on-resonance below-resonance subtracted Very relevant selection of modes!

  12. Into the era of B0 – B0 mixing ARGUS 79.5 pb-1 103 pb-1 • Limits on B0-B0 Mixing and tB0/tB+ (1987) • Branching Ratios of B Mesons to K+, K-, and K0/K0 (1987) • Improved Upper limit on Flavor-Changing Neutral-Current Decays of the b Quark (1987) • Evidence for Charmed Baryons in B-Meson Decay ((1987) • G(buln)/G(bcln) from the End Point of the Lepton Momentum Spectrum in Semileptonic B Decay (1987) • Exclusive Decays and Masses of the B Mesons (1987) • B0-B0 mixing at the Y(4S) (1989) Argus ARGUS, Phys. Lett. B 192, 245 (1987) 212 pb-1 Time-integrated mixing rate: 21%

  13. 212 pb-1; 240 K BB Big challenge: removing contribution from secondary leptons.

  14. Observation of B0-B0 Mixing in CLEO using Dileptons Like-sign dileptons Unlike-sign dileptons (For unlike sign, need to subtract contribution from B+B- events.)

  15. BABARMixing asymmetry data (raw) T=2p/Dm D<1 due to mistags tB=1.53 ps run out of events at long lifetimes

  16. Searching for bu...and finding it! • Search for Charmless Decays Bpp p and Bpp pp (1989) • Search for bu Transitions in Exclusive Hadronic B-Meson Decays (1989) • A Search for Exclusive Penguin Decays of B Mesons (1989) • Study of the decay BD*+ l n (1989) • Observation of B-Meson Semileptonic Decays to Noncharmed Final States (1990) • Exclusive and Inclusive Decays of B Mesons into Ds Mesons (1990) • Exclusive and Inclusive Semileptonic Decays of B Mesons to D Mesons (1991) • Inclusive and Exclusive Decays of B Mesons to Final States Including Charm and Charmonium Mesons (1992)

  17. 212 pb-1 • Major 1st step in the long struggle to measure |Vub|. • Inclusive measurement...in very limited region of phase space. • Continuum background suppression & determination crucial • If |Vub|=0, SM would predict no CP violation. scaled off res

  18. CLEO II: The Right Stuff

  19. How long to run below resonance?

  20. 20

  21. several more pages of math....

  22. March of the Penguins

  23. Loops in B decays: probe high mass scales! cited 560 times 1.377 fb-1 8 events 3 events 2 events HFAG

  24. cited 768 times 2.01 fb-1 not all that rare! B-reconstruction analysis Event-shape analysis Y(4S) data Y(4S) data scaled off-resonance scaled off-resonance background- subtracted data

  25. 9.1 fb-1

  26. Summary of B(BXsg) Thanks to Henning Flaecher! CLEO Phys.Rev.Lett.87,251807(2001) BR(B→Xsγ) = (3.29± 0.53) 10-4 (9.1 fb-1) Belle Semi Phys.Lett.B511:151(2001) BR(B→Xsγ) = (3.29± 0.53) 10-4 (5.8 fb-1) BaBar SemiPhys.Rev.D72:052004(2005) BR(B→Xsγ) = (3.29+0.62-0.50) 10-4 (81.5 fb-1) BaBar Incl Phys.Rev.Lett.97:171803(2006) BR(B→Xsγ) = (3.92± 0.56) 10-4 (81.5 fb-1) BaBar Full Phys.Rev.D77:051103(2008) BR(B→Xsγ) = (3.91± 1.11) 10-4 (210 fb-1) BELLE Incl (A. Limosani, Moriond EW08) BR(B→Xsγ) = (3.37± 0.41) 10-4 (605 fb-1) HFAG Average 08 (preliminary) BR(B→Xsγ) = (3.52± 0.25) 10-4 HFAG average: 7% experimental uncertainty huge theoretical effort: SM predictions: Misiak et al. (hep-ph/0609232) Becher et. al. (hep-ph/0610067) Andersen et al. (hep-ph/0609250) Very good agreement between experiments and analysis methods! BR(B→Xsγ) (10-4)

  27. Radiative penguins: The Next Generation! BABAR, PRL 98, 151802 (2007) signal + bkgnd B+r+g bkgnd signal B0r0g

  28. Yet another generation: electroweak penguins! Photon penguin Z penguin W+W- box • BaBar, Belle, CDF have observedBKl+l- and BK*l+l- • Rarest observed B decay: • Kinematic distributions sensitive to new physics (AFB vs. q2)

  29. Branching Fraction/10-6

  30. 1.37 fb-1 30

  31. 3.14 fb-1

  32. BK p: Direct CP Violation fromInterference between Penguin and Tree Diagrams BaBar, PRL 93, 131801, 2004 Bkgd symmetric! penguin “pollution” in Bp+p-

  33. from Steve Olsen’s talk at Aspen Winter Conf., 2008 Direct CPV in B Kp decays World Averages: Acp(K+p-) = -0.097±0.012 5s difference! Acp(K+p0) = +0.047±0.026 HEPAP Meeting

  34. Simple is beautiful: semileptonic B decays Understanding dynamics: form factors, HQE params, quark masses CKM matrix elements

  35. 924 pb-1 • Quantitative statement about size of |Vub| • Model dependence studied; part of long, long struggle. B Xcln + continuum “strict” contin suppression contin. Altarelli model R2 < 0.3

  36. ...and with a factor of 10 more data 9.13 fb-1 Total background, including B decay (histogram) On-resonance data (points) Scaled off-res data (shaded region) Background-subtracted, efficiency corrected spectrum Histogram: BXuln spectrum predicted from measured BXsg spectrum

  37. |Vub| Inclusive Measurements: HFAG Averages Theory framework: BLNP - B.O. Lange, M. Neubert and G. Paz, Phys. Rev. D72:073006 (2005) Good or Bad? The full breakdown of the uncertainties on the average |Vub| above is (all errors quoted in percent): positive errors: +2.0stat +2.3exp +1.3b2c model +1.4b2u model +7.0HQE param +0.5SF func +0.7sub SF +3.6matching +1.3WA = +8.8tot negative errors: -2.0stat -2.2exp -1.2b2c model -1.4b2u model -5.8HQE param -0.5SF func -0.7sub SF -3.3matching -1.3WA = -7.7tot

  38. Lattice QCD input is essential to fully exploit...

  39. The Heavy Quark Effective Theory Revolution TopCite 1000+ (cited 1576 times) • Weak Transition Form-Factors Between Heavy Mesons, N. Isgur and M.B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B237, 527 (1990). Cited 1458 times. • Semileptonic B and D Decays in the Quark Model, N. Isgur, D. Scora, G. Grinstein, and M. Wise, Phys. Rev. D39, 799, 1989. Cited 1114 times. 3 papers: 4000 citations

  40. Find your favorite place in the Dalitz plot. final-state D* at rest V-A: more points on R- than L-side 40

  41. 2.4 fb-1 Confirmed by BaBar, PRD 74, 692004 (2006)

  42. gentle fall-off of form factor soft p+

  43. The Triumph of Hadronic Decays Hadronic B decays have ultimately provided the most compelling test of the CKM framework through CP-violating effects. We need interfering amplitudes to do this. CLEO laid much of the foundation for this work. CKM fit using angles only

  44. The “Big B Paper” 0.89 fb-1 203 cites • Huge number of branching fractions • Color-suppressed decays • Polarization & factorization studies • Resonant substructure

  45. B decays involving charmonium golden mode for sin2b

  46. 3.1 fb-1 contributing mode for constraining g

  47. A path to g color suppressed How can we get interference? Need D0 f and D0 f.(For example, f =KS0p+p-.) Some observations: • Uses charged B decays; method is based on a direct CP asymmetry. Issues: strong phase d, rB=|A(bu)/A(bc)| =0.1-0.2 • Uses tree diagrams: no loops/mixing diagrams, no penguin/new physics issues. Together with |Vub|, gives CKM test with trees only.

  48. 9.13 fb-1 contributing mode for constraint on CKM angle a

  49. 9.13 fb-1 sin2b with penguins!

More Related