1 / 15

LetterEase: Improving the Multi-tap Method via Letter Reassignment

LetterEase: Improving the Multi-tap Method via Letter Reassignment. Presented By Katrina Cruz For Massey University 14 June 2005. Agenda. Introduction Background of the Study Literature Review Methodology LetterEase Results Discussion Conclusion. Introduction.

eliza
Télécharger la présentation

LetterEase: Improving the Multi-tap Method via Letter Reassignment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LetterEase: Improving the Multi-tap Method via Letter Reassignment Presented By Katrina Cruz For Massey University 14 June 2005

  2. Agenda • Introduction • Background of the Study • Literature Review • Methodology • LetterEase • Results • Discussion • Conclusion

  3. Introduction • There is a lack of fast and efficient text entry methods available for mobile phones. • Multi-tap method most popular. Figure 1: Conventional mobile phone keypad inefficiently designed for text entry.

  4. Introduction Cont. • Multi-tap has been criticised for being slow and cumbersome to use. • The purpose of this study is to minimize multi-tap’s weaknesses via LetterEase; a new letter assignment.

  5. Background to the Study • Short message service (SMS) became a real hit by 1998. • Commercial text input methods included: • A QWERTY keypad. • T9.

  6. Literature Review • Two-key disambiguation • Linguistic disambiguation • Dictionary-based • Prefix-based • TiltText • Chording Keyboards • Twiddler • ChordTap Figure 2: Chording keyboards

  7. Literature Review • MessageEase Figure 3: MessageEase

  8. Methodology • The study aimed to investigate LetterEase using a between-subjects experimental design. • In particular: • speed (wpm) • accuracy and • keystrokes per character (KSPC) will be examined.

  9. Methodology Cont. • 3 letter assignments were tested using mobile phone simulations running on an iPAQ PDA: • The conventional letter assignment • Fewer letters per Key (FLPK) • LetterEase Figure 4: FLPK letter assignment

  10. LetterEase • Derived from SMS letter-frequency data and the distance between buttons. Figure 5: LetterEase letter assignment

  11. Results Table 1: Overall task performance in each system (14 participants,20 trials)

  12. Discussion • Slower typing speed can be explained by MacKenzie’s study of text entry (2001), where learning is divided into 3 phases: • Initial discovery • Users develop motor skills • Actions are performed reflexively

  13. Conclusion • LetterEase reduced multi-tap KSPC by 37%, and error rate by 12%. • Speed is momentarily slower, however this may be likely to change over more trials.

  14. Conclusion Cont. • LetterEase should be more refined in design: • Greater amount of letter-frequency data needed • More trials needed • Character assignment issue needs to be resolved. • Potentially good chance of adoption given the standard numeric keypad’s popularity.

  15. Questions?

More Related