1 / 20

T IME H ISTORY OF E VENTS AND M ACROSCALE I NTERACTIONS DURING S UBSTORMS (THEMIS)

T IME H ISTORY OF E VENTS AND M ACROSCALE I NTERACTIONS DURING S UBSTORMS (THEMIS). SCIENCE GOALS: Primary: “How do substorms operate?” One of the oldest and most important questions in Geophysics A turning point in our understanding of the dynamic magnetosphere

elke
Télécharger la présentation

T IME H ISTORY OF E VENTS AND M ACROSCALE I NTERACTIONS DURING S UBSTORMS (THEMIS)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TIME HISTORY OF EVENTS AND MACROSCALE INTERACTIONS DURING SUBSTORMS (THEMIS) • SCIENCE GOALS: • Primary: • “How do substorms operate?” • One of the oldest and most important questions in Geophysics • A turning point in our understanding of the dynamic magnetosphere • First bonus science: • “What accelerates storm-time ‘killer’ electrons?” • A significant contribution to space weather science • Second bonus science: • “What controls efficiency of solar wind – magnetosphere coupling?” • Provides global context of Solar Wind – Magnetosphere interaction RESOLVING THE PHYSICS OF ONSET AND EVOLUTION OF SUBSTORMS Principal Investigator Vassilis Angelopoulos, UCB EPO Lead Nahide Craig, UCB Program Manager Peter Harvey, UCB Industrial Partner SWALES Aerospace

  2. Science Overview THEMIS determines where and how substorms are triggered. …important to NASA: Substorms are… • SEC Roadmap: “Understand energy, mass and flux transport in Geospace” • SEC Roadmap: “How does solar variability affect society?” • NRC, National Academy: A strategic question in space physics (1995). • Fundamental mode of magnetospheric circulation • Important for geo-storms have societal implications. • Rich in new types of basic space plasma physics. • Magnetospheric substorms are responsible for auroral eruptions. • Auroral eruptions are recurrent (~3-6hrs)

  3. ? P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 Reconnection AuroralEruption CurrentDisruption Events occuring during a substorm

  4. : Ground Based Observatory Mission elements Probe conjunctions along Sun-Earth line recur once per 4 days over North America. … while THEMIS’s space-based probes determine onset of Current Disruption and Reconnection each within <10s. Ground based observatories completely cover North American sector; can determine auroral breakup within 1-5s …

  5. Science Objectives • THEMIS HAS FOCUSED MINIMUM (TO BASELINE) OBJECTIVES: • Time History of Events… • Auroral breakup (on the ground) • Current Disruption [CD] (2 probes at ~10RE) • Reconnection [Rx] (2 probes at ~20-30RE) • … and Macroscale Interactions during >5 (>10) Substorms (Primary): • Current Disruption and Reconnection coupling • Outward motion (1600km/s) of rarefaction wave • Inward motion of flows (1000km/s) and Poynting flux. • Ionospheric coupling • Cross-tail current reduction (P5u/P4) vs flows • Field aligned current generation by flow vorticity, pressure gradients (dP/dz, dP/dx). • Cross-scale coupling to local modes • Field line resonances (10RE, 5 min) • Ballooning modes, KH waves (1RE, 1min) • Weibel instability, cross-field current instability, kinetic Alfven waves (0.1RE, 60Hz) • Production of storm time MeV electrons (Secondary) • Control of solar wind-magnetosphere coupling by the bow-shock, magnetosheath and magnetopause (Tertiary)

  6. Probe conjunctions well understood • BASELINE: >10 substorms achieved w/ 5 probes in 2 yrs & 50% margin. • MINIMUM: >5 substorms achieved in 1yr w/ 4 probes (margin factor of 3). • computations include lunar, solar, drag, J2 terms • dYP1/2/3/4/5<±2RE; dZP3,4,5/NS<±2RE; dZP1,2/NS<±5RE • Ascent design is optimal for science • maximizes conjunctions, minimizes shadows • … immune to launch insertion errors • small, piece-wise DVs increase placement fidelity • … and immune to probe insertion errors. • Can withstand insertion error of dV=80cm/s on any probe Actual conjunction times in 1st year

  7. EFIs EFIa SCM ESA BGS SST Operations UCB FGM Tspin=3s Instrument I&T UCB Ground Mission overview: Fault-tolerant design hasconstellation and instrument redundancy D2925-10 @ CCAS Encapsulation & launch Mission I&T Swales Probe instruments: ESA: Thermal plasmaSST: Super-thermal plasmaFGM: Low frequency B-fieldSCM: High frequency B-field EFI: Low and high frequency E-field

  8. Selected instruments built en masse before Identical instrumentation provides high science margins and fault tolerance • Instrument redundancy: • SST-ESA energy overlap • FGM-SCM frequency overlap • P1/P2 redundant instrumentation (only directional flux needed in one of two). • Each probe has: • 1FGM • 1ESA (i/e) • 2SSTh (2heads, i/e) • 1SCM • 4EFIs (4spin plane) • 2EFIa (2axials)

  9. Mission profile is robust

  10. First bonus: What producesstorm-time “killer” MeV electrons? Affect satellites and humans in space ANIK telecommunicationsatellites lost for days to weeksduring space storm • Source: • Radially inward diffusion? • Wave acceleration at radiation belt? • THEMIS: • Tracks radial motion of electrons • Measures source and diffusion • Frequent crossings • Measures E, B waves locally

  11. Second bonus: What controls efficiencyof solar wind – magnetosphere coupling? • Important for solar wind energy transfer in Geospace • Need to determine how: • Localized pristine solar wind features… • …interact with magnetosphere • THEMIS: • Alignments track evolution of solar wind • Inner probes determine entry type/size

  12. Mission design meets requirements • Mission profile • Two year mission design easily met in this high Earth orbit • Launch: D2925 from CCAS (40min window any day) permits 32% lift margin • Simple probe carrier (3rd stage fixture) w/ release built by an experienced team • Science & routine ops and multi-object tracking has ample heritage at UCB • Simple RCS, heritage sfw & ground-cmd and GSFC/GNCD support benefits MOC • Probe design • Simple, passive thermal design w/ thermostatically controlled heaters • Survival at all attitudes under worst shadow conditions • Simple data flow / automated routine science ops minimize cost and risk • Store/Forward 375Mbit/orbit (256Mbyte capability permits multi-orbit storage) • Orbit control & knowledge exceed placement rqmts by factor of 10 • Early EMC/ESC mitigation as per heritage practices (e.g. FAST, POLAR)

  13. Active trade studies constantly reduce risk An integrated team of scientists and engineers constantly optimize mission design and resources, reducing risk. Phase A main trade studies: • Direct inject with passive PCA on larger LV reduces schedule and ops risks • PCA dispense simplified: improves clearances, reduces risk • Increased fuel tank capacity to take full advantage of mass to orbit capability, yet at lower cost • Added solar panels at bottom face • ACS solution simplified with micro-gyros replacing accelerometers • Connected RCS propulsion pods Phase B main trade studies: • Exercised alternate path for SST instrument • Tuned Phase A orbit design to reduce differential precession; enhanced 2nd year science products • Changed BAU processor to reduce software complexity motivated by GSFC experience • Increased thruster size to reduce finite arc inefficiency and Msn Ops complexity • Repackaged SST and SCM electronics along with IDPU • Removed ESA attenuator (simplified instrument) with minimal effect on bonus science • Included redundant actuators and surge protection in instrument designs

  14. Descope list and science-relatedrisk mitigation factors • Re-positioning allows recovery from failure of critical instruments on some probes • Graceful degradation results from partial or even full instrument failures • Instrument frequency and energy range overlaps • Complete backup option for EFI radials (need 2 in most probes but have 4) • Relaxed measurement requirements (1nT absolute is not permitted to drive team, but rather a nicety) • Substorms come in wide variety; can still see large ones with degraded instruments • Minimum mission can be accomplished with a reduced set of spacecraft requirements • EMC and ESC requirements important for baseline but less severe for minimum mission • Observation strategy can be tuned to power loss (turn-on/off) and thermal constraints (tip-over/back) • Fuel and mass margins for 1st year (minimum) are 30% larger than for a two year (baseline) mission

  15. P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 Minimum mission provides definitive answer to the substorm question. • Simultaneous observations in the key regions • Ideal geometries for tens of substorms • Data rates / time resolution exceed requirements • Analysis tools available from Cluster, ISTP, FAST • Experienced co-Is are leaderson both sides of substorm controversy • 5-probe build affords high reliability (Ps=0.93) for minimum mission (4/5) even with single string design • Minimum mission achieved within 8 mo. from nominal launch date (~1yr regardless of launch date)

  16. BACKUP SLIDES

  17. Baseline L1 Requirements • S-1 Substorm Onset Time • Determine substorm onset time and substorm meridian magnetic local time (MLT) using ground ASIs (one per MLT hr) and MAGs (two per MLT hr) with t_res<30s and dMLT<1 degree respectively, in an 8hr geographic local time sector including the US. (M-11, GB-1) • S-2 Current Disruption (CD) Onset Time • Determine CD onset time with t_res<30s, using two near-equatorial (within 2Re of magnetic equator) probes, near the anticipated current disruption site (~8-10 Re). CD onset is determined by remote sensing the expansion of the heated plasma via superthermal ion flux measurements at probes within +/-2Re of the measured substorm meridian and the anticipated altitude of the CD. (M-9, IN.SST-1, IN.SST-4, IN.FGM-1) • S-3 Reconnection (Rx) Onset Time • Determine Rx onset time with t_res<30s, using two near-equatorial (< 5Re from magnetic equator) probes, bracketing the anticipated Rx site (20-25Re). Rx onset is determined by measuring the time of arrival of superthermal ions and electrons from the Rx site, within dY=+/-2Re of the substorm meridian and within <10Re from the Rx altitude. ….. (M-9, IN.EFI-2, IN.ESA-1, IN.SST-2, IN.SST-3, IN.SST-4, IN.FGM-1) • S-4 Simultaneous Observations • Obtain simultaneous observations of: substorm onset and meridian (ground), CD onset and Rx onset for >10 substorms in the prime observation season (September-April). Given an average 3.75hr substorm recurrence in the target tail season, a 2Re width of the substorm meridian, a 1Re requirement on probe proximity to the substorm meridian (of width 2Re) and a 20Re width of the tail in which substorms can occur, this translates to a yield of 1 useful substorm event per 18.75hrs of probe alignments, i.e, a requirement of >188hrs of four-probe alignments within dY=+/-2Re. (M-1, M-12, IN.FGM-1)

  18. … continued: Baseline L1 Requirements • S-5 Earthward Flows • Track between probes the earthward ion flows (400km/s) from the Rx site and the tailward moving rarefaction wave in the magnetic field, and ion plasma pressure (motion at 1600km/s) with sufficient precision (dV/V=10% or V within 50km/s whichever is larger, dB/B=10%, or B within 1nT whichever is larger, dP/P=10%, or P within 0.1nPa whichever is larger) to ascertain macroscale coupling between current disruption and reconnection site during >10 substorm onsets (>188hrs of four-probes aligned within dY of +-2Re). (IN.ESA-1, IN.SST-3, IN.FGM-1) • S-6 Pressure Gradients • Determine the radial and cross-current-sheet pressure gradients (anticipated dP/dR, dP/dZ ~0.1nPa/Re) and ion flow vorticity/deceleration with probe measurement accuracy of 50km/s/Re, over typical inter-probe conjunctions in dR and dZ of 1Re, each during >10 onsets. The convective component of the ion flow is determined at 8-10Re by measurements of the 2D electric field (spin-plane to within +-30degrees of ecliptic, with dE/E=10% or 1mV/m accuracy whichever is larger) assuming the plasma approximation at t_res<30s. (IN.EFI-1, IN.ESA-1, IN.ESA-2, IN.SST-3, IN.FGM-1) • S-7 Cross-Current Sheet changes • Determine the cross-current-sheet current change near the current disruption region (+/-2Re of meridian, +-2Re of measured current disruption region) at substorm onset from a pair of Z-separated probes using the planar current sheet approximation with relative (interprobe) resolution and interorbit (~12hrs) stability of 0.2nT. (IN.FGM-1, PB-42, PB-43, PB-44) • S-8 non-MHD plasma • Obtain measurements of the Magneto-Hydrodynamic (MHD) and non-MHD parts of the plasma flow through comparisons of ion flow from the ESA detector and ExB flow from the electric field instrument, at the probes near the current disruption region, with t_res<10s. (IN.EFI-1, IN.ESA-1, IN.SST-3, IN.FGM-1)

  19. … continued: Baseline L1 Requirements • S-9 Cross-Tail Pairs • Determine the presence, amplitude, and wavelength of field-line resonances, Kelvin-Helmholz waves and ballooning waves on cross-tail pairs (dY=0.5-10Re) with t_res<10s measurements of B, P and V for >10 substorm onsets. (IN.ESA-1, IN.SST-3) • S-10 Cross-Field Current Instabilities • Determine the presence of cross-field current instabilities (1-60Hz), whistlers and other high frequency modes (up to 600Hz) in 3D electric and magnetic field data on two individual probes near the current disruption region for >10 substorm events. (IN.EFI-3, IN.ESA-3, IN.SCM-1) • S-11 Dayside Science • Determine the nature, extent and cause of magnetopause transient events (on dayside). (IN.ESA-4, IN.SST-6)

  20. Minimum L1 Requirements (from L1’s) • 4.1.2.1 Substorm Onset Time • Determine substorm onset time and substorm meridian magnetic local time (MLT) using ground MAGs (at least one per MLT hr) with t_res<30s and dMLT<6 degrees respectively, in a 6hr geographic local time sector including the US. • 4.1.2.2 Current Disruption (CD) Onset Time • Determine CD onset time with t_res<30s, using two near-equatorial (within 2Re of magnetic equator) probes, near the anticipated CD site (~8-10 Re). …(same as baseline) • 4.1.2.3 Reconnection (Rx) Onset Time • Determine Rx onset time with t_res<30s, using two near-equatorial (<5Re of magnetic equator) probes, bracketing the anticipated Rx site (20-25Re). … (same as baseline) • 4.1.2.4 Simultaneous Observations • Obtain simultaneous observations of: substorm onset and meridian (ground), CD onset and reconnection onset for >5 substorms in the prime observation season (September-April). Substorm statistics discussed in S-4 point to a requirement of >94hrs of four probe alignments. • 4.1.2.5 Energetic ion and electron fluxes • SST to measure near the ecliptic plane (+/-30o) superthermal i+ and e- fluxes (30-100keV) at t_res<30s. • 4.1.2.6 Earthward Flows • Track between probes the earthward ion flows (400km/s) from the reconnection site and the tailward moving rarefaction wave in the magnetic field, and ion plasma pressure (motion at 1600km/s) with sufficient precision precision (dV/V=10% or V within 50km/s whichever is larger, dB/B=10%, or B within 1nT whichever is larger, dP/P=10%, or P within 0.1nPa whichever is larger) to ascertain macroscale coupling between current disruption and reconnection site during >5 substorm onsets.

More Related