1 / 30

Post-Implementation Evaluation of an ERP/SIS

Post-Implementation Evaluation of an ERP/SIS. Jim Barry Chief Consulting Officer 360 Consulting Group & Wayne D. Powel Associate Academic Vice President Gonzaga University. Gonzaga University. Private regional comprehensive university Enrollment ~5,000 Tuition dependent

elle
Télécharger la présentation

Post-Implementation Evaluation of an ERP/SIS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Post-Implementation Evaluation of an ERP/SIS Jim Barry Chief Consulting Officer 360 Consulting Group & Wayne D. Powel Associate Academic Vice President Gonzaga University

  2. Gonzaga University • Private regional comprehensive university • Enrollment ~5,000 • Tuition dependent • Modest technology investments • Efficiency in business is key

  3. The Road to an ERP/SIS • Recognized value of common shared data set in the early 1990s • Worked on home brewed solution for 2 years • Project unable to gain traction • Growing awareness of commercial options

  4. The Road (continued) • Committee formed and RFP let in 1995 • Vendor chosen • Two year implementation • Modules Implemented: • Student • Finance • Human Resources • University Relations • Recruitment

  5. Present Day • Desire to look back, assess progress, confirm course • Actual cost of implementation • On-going costs • Comparison to alternatives • Is this still the best choice for Gonzaga University?

  6. Additional Goals of Study • Determine the current value of the system from the user perspective • Evaluate alternatives currently available in the marketplace • Other ERP / SIS • Best-of-Breed • Hybrid systems

  7. Additional Goals of Study • Survey other Jesuit and peers for • What used and • Satisfaction with • Functionality • Vendor support • Evaluate other ways of delivering business applications • ASP • Outsource • Consortium

  8. Survey of Peers • Of nine surveyed, 100% used ERP • 67% used the same ERP as Gonzaga • No propensity to change • Support good to adequate • Human cost of change too high

  9. Evaluation Methodology • Rapid Economic Justification (REJ) • Combines traditional TCO with: • Effectiveness in supporting business requirements • Alignment with strategic goals & direction • 5 step process

  10. R.E.J. Process • Determine alignment with business requirements • Understands the solutions evaluated • Understand the cost-benefit equation • Determine and understand the risks • Evaluate the financial metrics

  11. Data Gathering Process • Internal interviews • Department heads • Senior management • Other CIO’s • Solution research

  12. Original ERP Cost

  13. On-Going Support Cost

  14. Value of Current ERP/SIS • One Integrated v. Disparate Systems • Single Historical Repository of Business & Student Data • Standardization of Business Processes, Enforced by the Software

  15. Value of Current ERP/SIS • “The system revolutionized the use of data in the University’s environment.” • “It was critical for Gonzaga to reconcile and standardize its business processes. The system did that for us.” • “We could not be raising the kind of funds we are today without our system.”

  16. Value of Current ERP/SIS • “Implementation of this system was the single greatest achievement of the last decade at Gonzaga.”

  17. Business Requirements • Student Information System • Admissions • Registrar • Housing/residence • Financial aid • Certification • Student accounts • Student life

  18. Business Requirements • Finance • G/L • Budgeting • Fixed assets • A/R • Procurement – A/P • Endowment management

  19. Business Requirements • University Relations (Advancement) • Alumni relations • Development • Major gifts • Annual/planned giving • Government relations

  20. Business Requirements • Human Resources • HRIS • Payroll • Academics • Degree audit • Career services

  21. Other Solutions • ERP SIS (5) • Best-of-Breed (8) • Hybrid (2)

  22. Cost Comparisons

  23. Other Options • ASP • Outsource • Consortium • Solution Provider

  24. Summary • Cost app. $3.5 M in 1995 $$$’s • Costs app. $700 K annually to support • ROI was incalculable • Value to G.U. of current solution • Met initial expectations • Data extraction & report writing could be better • Has been a springboard for growth

  25. Summary • Neither Hybrid nor Best of Breed meets G.U.’s business requirements • Replacement cost close to that of least expensive comparative solution • Support cost close to that of least expensive comparative solution

  26. Summary • Outsourcing, ASP’s and a Consortium were not palatable to the University

  27. Application “Mid-Life”

  28. Recommendations • REVITALIZE THE APPLICATION • TAKE THE APPLICATION TO THE NEXT LEVEL • Learn to use features/functions not being utilized • Add additional needed functionality

  29. Recommendations • Stepped up formal education program • Develop additional tools for data extraction and manipulation • Develop a web portal to front-end the ERP/SIS

  30. Present Day Still the best choice for Gonzaga University!

More Related