1 / 61

PIA 2528 Governance, Local Government and Civil Society

PIA 2528 Governance, Local Government and Civil Society. Week Six. Historical Patterns. Land, Rural Development and Human Resource Development. Overgrazing in Latin America. Governance and Sovereignty.

elsu
Télécharger la présentation

PIA 2528 Governance, Local Government and Civil Society

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PIA 2528Governance, Local Government and Civil Society Week Six

  2. Historical Patterns Land, Rural Development and Human Resource Development

  3. Overgrazing in Latin America

  4. Governance and Sovereignty "[T]ransformation (and globalization) has led to a reinvention of government and what it does" - Anonymous

  5. Executive Governance

  6. Historical Patterns of Governance • Paternalism- Empires • Monarchy, Theocracy and Authoritarianism • Authority Linked to the Control of Land (and Water)- Feudalism • Capitalism and Property Rights

  7. Three Sub-Themes • Governance: • Land and Water Use • Rural Change • Human Skills Development and Agriculture

  8. The Evolution of the Rural Community 1. Hunter-gatherers: Age-grade societies 2. Settled Subsistence Agriculturalists

  9. San or Basarwa of Southern Africa

  10. The Evolution of the Rural Community-2 3. Cattle Keeping 4. Plantations, Commercial Farms and Agri-Business 5. So-Called Communal Tenure

  11. Indian Cattle Keeping

  12. Traditional: Communal The term is misleading- there are an infinite number of land relationships- Note Three 1. Use same land for individual benefit (cattle rearing)

  13. Communal Land 2. People use same land and pool proceeds- aspiration in socialist countries. (Communalism): Little evidence in traditional society COLLECTIVE FARMS AND FARM FACTORIES

  14. Soviet Collectives

  15. Communal Land 3. Individual use of land for individual gain a. without legal tenure b. no sale or disposal of land c. no collateral

  16. Property Rights

  17. Modernization- Western (and to some Colonial) Land Divisions a. Individual ownership and control of land with rights of transfer, inheritance and sale b. Usufruct: Leasing of Land c. Landed elites- landed aristocracy d. MNCs as plantation farmers- Firestone, Dole and Unilever

  18. Usufruct- “On the halves”

  19. Issue of Usufruct Usufruct is the legal right to use and derive profit or benefit from property that belongs to another person Share Cropping: “Farming on the Halves”

  20. Land Reform - Action and Research in Scotland

  21. The Problem of Landlordism • Tenancy relationship to large hacienda, plantation or commercial agricultural enterprise • In much of the world, Land is traditional controlled by land-lords • Vast majority of rural peasants in some form of tenancy relationships

  22. Ecuador Hacienda

  23. Landlordism • Serfdom: legal linkage to land and ownership • Small scale subsistence agriculturalist- produce for food • Reality: Peasants- dependency relationship to land

  24. Serfs vs. Slaves? Russian Serfs Alexander I Freeing the Serfs

  25. Rural Socialism as an ideology in the 1960s 1. Peasant collectives and Communal state farms- Soviet Union 2. Voluntary collectives- Ujamaa villages in Tanzania 3. Move the peasant away from individualized production (China) 4. Ideal: village level economies of scale 5. Reality: Failure- Collectives, prefectoralism and state enterprises (State Agri-Collectives)

  26. Tanzania Socialism

  27. Individual Land Tenure: Results • Landless Rural Workers- Sell their labor in cities, to plantations, to small farmers or as a labor export (regionally or internationally) • The realities and limits of collective finance: From Burial Societies to micro-credit schemes • How to define individual relationship to land: FAILURE OF LAND TENURE REFORM

  28. Zimbabwe

  29. Rural Development and civil society Induced Rural Transformation-Approaches 1. Radical Transformation- urbanization a. Primacy of Industrialization b. Emphasis on infrastructure and mechanization of farming

  30. Cuba

  31. Rural Development 2. Green Revolution: Variant of above. Capital intensive and export oriented. (Landlordism?) a. Focus is primarily on Technical (seeds, equipment- focus is on extension and technical) b. Economies of scale mean large farms

  32. Rural Development • 3. Small holder approach- Primacy is on rural sector INTEGRATED RURAL DEVELOPMENT

  33. Green Revolution: Two Views

  34. Rural Development and Governance 1. Primacy of social development, health, education, community development 2. Small holder peasant sector 3. Stresses the importance of individual land tenure and producer cooperatives in marketing 4. Links with local government structures: Village Development Committees 5. Role for Civil Society Groups

  35. Rural Cooperatives

  36. China

  37. Problem: Critics of “Capitalist” Commercial Farming- LDCs • Lack of an Alternative and Failure of Collective Agriculture • Failure of and agricultural transformation except for parts of Southeast Asia (plus war and weather) • Lead to the decline of the state and the intervention of NGOs - Relief and Humanitarian activities

  38. The Image Projected

  39. Coffee Break • Fifteen Minutes

  40. The Problem • Planning for Local Government and Rural Development • Need Local Government Institutions • 1. District Administration: D.C. • 2. Traditional Leaders-Kgotla • 3. District Councils • 4, Land Boards • 5. District Development Committees

  41. Kgotla- Traditional Assembly

  42. Human Resource Development L. Picard- Botswana Study

  43. Local Government Training Plan

  44. Local Government Structurein Botswana Approved by the National Assembly in December 1981 GOVERNMENT PAPER NO. 1 OF 1981 Gaborone, Republic of Botswana “Proof of Government's concern is shown by a recently commissioned study of Manpower and Training Needs of the unified local government Service, 1982-1992) by Dr. Louis A. Picard of the Institute of Development Management (I.D.M).”

  45. Table 1: Education and Training Needs of Unified Local Government Service – Summary by Position Classification of Those in Post, February, 1981 * Vacancies include expatriates in position

  46. Table 2: Sample Table of Cadre Manpower and Training Positions* * Footnotes to be provided for explanation of assumptions

  47. Local Government in Action

  48. Table 3: Summary of Manpower and Training Needs, 1982 – 1992, by ‘A’ and ‘B’ Posts

More Related