1 / 68

Bruce Mayer, PE Licensed Electrical & Mechanical Engineer BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu

Chabot Engineering. Degrees, PEs, and System Engineering. Bruce Mayer, PE Licensed Electrical & Mechanical Engineer BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu. Outline. Speaker Bio Which Degree; BS, MS, PhD, PE? Systems Engineering What is it? The Defining Attributes

elton
Télécharger la présentation

Bruce Mayer, PE Licensed Electrical & Mechanical Engineer BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chabot Engineering Degrees, PEs, andSystem Engineering Bruce Mayer, PE Licensed Electrical & Mechanical EngineerBMayer@ChabotCollege.edu

  2. Outline • Speaker Bio • Which Degree; BS, MS, PhD, PE? • Systems Engineering • What is it? • The Defining Attributes • How it Differs From CE, ChemE, EE, MatE, ME, etc. • Why is it needed? • i.e., What is the Value

  3. Outline cont.1 • How Do I Prepare for Systems Engineering? • Communication • Leadership • Professional Engineering (PE) License • WHAT is it? • HOW do I earn it? • Application PreReq & Process • Effort Level • WHY SHOULD I Earn it? • CE’s vs. Everyone Else

  4. Outline cont.2 • LeaderShip • A Critical Engineering Skill • College/University Employment Recruiting • What Employers are looking for • One Recruiter’s Perspective

  5. MS Electrical Engineering Stanford, 1991 MS Mechanical Engineering Stanford, 1983 BS Mechanical Engineering UCBerkeley, 1978 AS Engineering Cabrillo College, 1976 Professional Engineering License Electrical, 2002 Mechanical, 1982 CA Community College Teaching Credential, 1984 B. Mayer Prof/Academic Bio-1

  6. Engineering Honor Societies Tau Beta Pi () The All-Engineering Equivalent of  Pi Tau Sigma () Mechanical Engrng Professional Associations Current Member ASME IEEE Past Member ASHRAE NSPE SID ACM Patents 6,846,149 (2005) 6,610,150 (2003) 6,544,345 (2003) 5,122,391 (1992) U.S. Patent App 20040231588 B. Mayer Prof/Academic Bio-2

  7. Publications Journal of Vac. Sci and Tech (2001) Electrochemical Soc. Proceedings (1997) IEEE Trans. Semi. Manufacturing (1996) Thin Solid Films (Elsevier – 1992) LBL Report EEB-Env-79-2 (1979) Professional History Olympus-ITA (2000 → 2003) Managing Director, System Design & Integration Engineering Watkins-Johnson Co. (1979 → 2000) Managing Director, System Design & Integration Engineering B. Mayer Prof/Academic Bio-3

  8. Professional History Watkins-Johnson Co. Senior Electrical/Process/Mechanical Design Engineer Flat Panel Deposition Equipment/Process Engineering Manager APCVD System Design Engineer Firing Furnace Mechanical DesignEngineer Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Research Assistant, Bldg Envelopes Grp Industry Awards Semiconductor International Magazine 1994 BEST PRODUCT Award,WJ-1000APCVD Sys. B. Mayer Prof/Academic Bio-4

  9. Which Degree for Me? • A New-Grad Baccalaureate Engineer Must Make a Choice • Go To GRADUATESCHOOL IMMEDIATELY • If so, then MS or PhD? • Enter the PRACTICE of Engineering • Go to Graduate School LATER? • Limitations of BS-Only?

  10. Proponencies Quickest Path to Making a Living Largest Absolute Number of Professional Opportunities Best Selection of COMPANY and LOCATION Contraries Not Sufficient Qualifications for Some Positions Statistically the Lowest Compensation Lowest on the Prestige Ladder But Still MUCH better than any OTHER Type of BS degree BS-Degree → Pros & Cons

  11. Proponencies Only 1-1.5 Years After BS Degree Qualified for Some Research Positions Not “Over Qualified” for Most BS Positions Still have Large Selection of Employers & Locations Contraries Not Sufficient Qualifications for Pure Research Positions Extra Work without earning a Title You’re Still a “Mr.” or a “Ms.” Only about 25% up the Prestige Ladder MS-Degree → Pros & Cons

  12. Proponencies Qualified for the Highest Positions The Chance to Do ORIGINAL Research Statistically Best Compensation Top of the Prestige Ladder Instant Credibility Contraries May be Considered “Over Qualified” for Many Positions Severely Contracts the Employer & Location Sets 3-4 YEARS of INTENSE Academic Training after the BS No Salary, Large Student Loans PhD-Degree → Pros & Cons

  13. Caveat Emptor • Success in the Private Sector is NOT Strictly Tied to Academic Achievement • These People Hold Advanced Degrees • Jack Welch, CEO General Electric • Ph.D. ChemE University of Illinois • Andy Grove, CEO Intel Corp. • Ph.D., ChemE UCBerkeley • These People Do NOT • Bill Gates, Chairman MicroSoft • Michael Dell, Chairman Dell Computer • Larry Ellison, CEO ORACLE Corp

  14. SystemsEngineering Concept Drawing forIC Manuf. Machine Tool

  15. Systems Engineering • What is it? → Short Answer • Understand the Needs of the CUSTOMER • To Design the ARCHITECTURE of a MULTI-ELEMENT SYSTEM (Product and/or Service) • Then LEAD Product DESIGN, PROTOTYPING, TESTING, and INTRODUCTION • Lead by Determining WHO will do WHAT by WHEN and for HOW MUCH-$

  16. System Architecture – WJ2000A B. Mayer B. Mayer FSMenagh RSMurphy MSWalton CEErickson R. Reghitto HSPaek L. Harlamoff AKMcGrogan MSWalton CalPoly-SLOAlum Z. Yuan DMDobkin B. Mayer(acting as of 08Nov)

  17. A system is a construct or collection of DIFFERENT ELEMENTS that TOGETHER produce results NOT OBTAINABLE by the ELEMENTS ALONE. The elements, or parts, can include PEOPLE, HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, FACILITIES, POLICIES, and DOCUMENTS The RESULTS include SYSTEM Level qualities, Properties, Characteristics, Functions, Behavior and PERFORMANCE. The VALUE ADDED by the system as a whole, beyond that contributed independently by the parts, is primarily CREATED by the RELATIONSHIP AMONG THE PARTS; that is, how they are interconnected What IS a System? Courtesy of the International Council on Systems Engineering

  18. WHY Systems Engineering? • Modern Heavily-Engineered Products are Highly INTERDISCIPLINARY • UNDERSTANDING and DESIGN of Complex-Component INTERACTION is AS IMPORTANT as the Components themselves • SOMEONE has to have a View of the Product From the CUSTOMER/USER Perspective

  19. SysEngr Characteristics • A TRUE Technical Position • NOT a “Program MANAGER” • Some Synonyms • Project Engineer • System Architect (my Favorite) • Product Engineer • The Primary TECHNICAL Contact for • Customers • Company Upper-Management

  20. System Performance Design Rules • USERS of Heavily Engineered systems generally do not specify the detailed performance requirements for the Hardware & Software that comprise the system. Instead the CUSTOMER (often another Engineer) specifies PERFORMANCE criteria such as ThruPut, OutPut Quality, DownTime, etc. • System Engineers translate the CUSTOMER PERFORMANCE Requirements into internal HW/SW Design SPECIFICATIONS.

  21. Systems Engineering Owns • System Architecture • Overall Function of the System at a Conceptual Level • Customer Interface Documents • Facility/Installation Diagram(s) • Facility/Host  Communication interface • The System Specification that defines • System & Subsystem Performance • Life Cycle Analysis if Needed

  22. Systems Engineering Owns cont.-1 • The System Specification that defines System & Subsystem Compliance to industry standards and regulations • System Operation (a.k.a. Theory of Operation) • Subsystem Interconnects (System integration) • The Project Schedule (How Long?) • The Project Budget (How Much?)

  23. Systems Engineering Owns cont.-2 • The Project Implementation Team (Who?) • Elements from: Mechanical/Electrical Design, Process, Software, Manuf., etc. • Setting Project Priorities (What Next?) • Technical Communication to the “Outside World” (Product Education) • Internal Sales & Marketing • Operations (Manuf, Training, Service) • Customers Directly When Needed

  24. SysEngr owns the Product Spec

  25. SysEngr – Technical Side • The INCOSE “SIMILAR” Model • State the problem • Investigate alternatives • Model the system • Integrate • Launch the system, • Assess performance • Re-evaluate

  26. APNext™ Generation ThruPut Enhancement System Architecture Analysis Bruce Mayer, PE Product Development Team Leader bmayer@svg.com • 14Apr2000

  27. Architectural Analysis: Define Terms MODEL the SYSTEM • General Case APNext™ Chamber • m = number of MultiBlok™ Injectors (2 in this example) • n = number gas outlets in a MultiBlok™ Injector (3 in this case) • k = number of heated chucks (2 in this example) • j = number of deposition/coating passes (6 in this example)

  28. Define of Stroke-Length Terms MODEL the SYSTEM • In Most Subsequent Analyses • Lg = 25 mm • Lss = 55 mm • P = 60 mm • Lcc = 518 mm (300mm) • W = 28 mm • Lox = 9mm • Lmb = 50 mm • Lend = 100 mm

  29. The Distance Equations MODEL the SYSTEM

  30. Adm Velocity & Gas-On Time Eqns MODEL the SYSTEM • Term definitions • d = film depth (0.8 µm = 8000 Å) • j = number of passes under the injectors (14) • m = number of MulitBlok™ Injectors (2) • n = number of MultiBlok™ Outlets (2) • Adm= Area under Static Print Dep Mound (1595 Å-mm/s) • Ltot = Total Translate Path-Length

  31. MODEL the SYSTEM

  32. SysEngr Special Skills • MUST Be Comfortable In Front of the CUSTOMER • When the Sales Engineers Exhaust Their Technical Expertise the SysEngr Takes Over to Explain the Product • Effective Communicator • Become a POLISHED and PROFESSIONAL Presenter • Write CLEARLY and CONCISELY • Write a LOT

  33. SysEngr Special Skills • Accurate Task SCHEDULER • Aim for Massive PARALLELISM • Recognize DEPENDENCIES & SEQUENCES • Extra Effort to NOT to MISS Anything • Accurate L&M $-Cost ESTIMATOR • SysEngr OWES Company Management REALISTIC $-Cost Estimates • Serves as Input to the Business-Required Return on Investment (RoI) Decisions

  34. Overall/LongTerm 3x00 S2/S8/CE Schedule Ref. BMayer file 3100_S2S8CE_0109.mpp

  35. Overall/LongTerm 3x00 S2/S8/CE Schedule

  36. Project $-Cost Estimate

  37. Take Courses OUTSide Your Discipline Listen Carefully to Product Users Learn to Write, and Write a lot Become Comfortable in Front of an Audience Take LEADERSHIP Positions INCOSE Cert How Do I Prepare For SysEngr?

  38. Excellence thru CSEP Balanced Solutions SE Disciplines Qualifyingfor SE Experience • Requirements Engineering • Risk and Opportunity Management • Baseline Control • Technical Planning • Technical Effort Assessment • Design Development • Qualification, Verification, and Validation • Process Definition • Tool Support • Training • System Integration • Quality Assurance • Specialty Engineering SE Certification

  39. The “Board”

  40. Professional Engineer License • What is it? • Defined by the State of California PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS ACT • Business and Professions Code § 6700 – 6799 • §6701. Professional Engineer Defined • “Professional engineer”… refers to a person engaged in the professional practice of rendering service or creative work requiring education, training and experience in engineering sciences and the application of special knowledge of the mathematical, physical and engineering sciences in such professional or creative work as consultation, investigation, evaluation, planning or design of public or private utilities, structures, machines, processes, circuits, buildings, equipment or projects, and supervision of construction for the purpose of securing compliance with specifications and design for any such work.

  41. How to Earn the License • Graduate • From an ABET-accredited engineering program at a college or university • Earn Engineer-in-Training (EIT) Cert • Pass the 8-Hour FUNDAMENTALS Exam • Take After 3rd Year at an ABET Accredited University • Accumulate 6 yrs qualifying experience • 4 yrs for BS; 5 yrs for MS or PhD • Need at Least ONE year of REAL Experience • Pass the 8-Hr, Discipline-Specific Professional Engineer’s Exam

  42. PE Exam Application

  43. The Board’s Mission • From: http://www.pels.ca.gov/pubs/consumer_guide.pdf • The Mission of the Board for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors is to safeguard the life, health, property, and welfare of the public by regulating the practice of professional engineering and land surveying

  44. The Board’s Actions • The Board accomplishes its Mission by: • Licensing qualified individuals as professional engineers and land surveyors. • Anticipating changes in the engineering and land surveying professions to ensure that the laws and regulations are contemporary, relevant, and responsive. • Establishing regulations and promoting professional conduct. • Enforcing laws and regulations. • Providing information so that the public can make informed decisions regarding utilizing professional engineering and land surveying services.

  45. WebLinks to forms • http://www.pels.ca.gov/pubs/forms/peappform.pdf • http://www.pels.ca.gov/applicants/fee_schedule_new.html#application_fees • http://www.pels.ca.gov/applicants/exam_fees_to_ncees_prometric.html • http://www.pels.ca.gov/applicants/eit_lsitapp.shtml • GOOD ONE

  46. TakeHome Exam on Ethics • Covers • CA state-laws • BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, AND GEOLOGISTS rules • Ethics in General • http://www.pels.ca.gov/applicants/pe_takehome.pdf • Can see actual questions

  47. EIT → Not so Bad Are the TestsHard? • PE → Can be Quite Difficult • About 60% for CE,EE, and ME

  48. Why Earn the PE License? • Do I NEED it? • Civil Engineers → Absolutely REQUIRED • 90+% of CE Work Must Be Approved by A State-Licensed Civil/Structural Engineer • CE is PRACTICE REGULATED by the State of Calif. • EveryOne Else → NICE to Have • 90-95% of Work in the Other Major Disciplines Does NOT require licensure • EE and ME are PARTIALLY Practice-Regulated • Primarily Those who Work for the State, Cities, and Counties • ALL Other Branches are NOT Practice-Regulated • Thus NO Regulation-Driven Registration

More Related