SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

Comprehensive Review of 2010 GHG Inventory Reports: Trends, Limitations, and Awards

elvin avatar
elvin
11 diapositives · 246 Views · Sep 09, 2014

This document offers a structured review of GHG Inventory Reports (IIRs) from 2010, focusing on transparency, completeness, comparability, consistency, and accuracy of emission estimates. It discusses the roles of policy makers, the public, and data users, while highlighting the importance of building trust in data quality. The review also outlines the performance scoring system for IIRs, critiques common shortcomings, and recognizes exemplary reports with awards for comprehensiveness and innovation, providing insights into trends and necessary improvements for future assessments.

#comprehensive review of 2010 ghg inventory reports: trends, limitations, and awards #comprehensive review of 2010 ghg inventory reports: trends, limitations, and awards ppt #powerpoint #presentation
Comprehensive Review of 2010 GHG Inventory Reports: Trends, Limitations, and Awards - slide 1
01 / 11Comprehensive Review of 2010 GHG Inventory Reports: Trends, Limitations, and Awards
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Comprehensive Review of 2010 GHG Inventory Reports: Trends, Limitations, and Awards
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. A Quick Review of IIRs in 2010 Justin Goodwin: ETC-ACC Supported by EEA

  2. Outline • Some Simple Analysis • Some Awards

  3. IIRs Why ? • Policy Makers the Public & Users of the data. • Supports the data (NFR) • Explain Emission Trends • Understand areas needed for improvement • Build Trust in the data • National System, QA/QC, KCA • Highlight Limitations (IE, NE, Uncertainties) • Understand Changes • Makes Stage 3 Review Possible

  4. IIRs What ? • Transparency: including whether the data provided shows clearly the methods, assumptions and data sources used for the estimates. • Completeness: ensuring that all anthropogenic sources of emission are included for which there are methods provided in The Guidebook • Comparability: ensuring that emission estimates are compiled using similar and compatible methods across Parties and provided at a similar level of detail. • Consistency: ensuring that data provided by a party has consistent data and assumptions across years and pollutants reported. • Accuracy: assessment to ensure that uncertainties in emission estimates are minimised and that uncertainty analysis forms the basis of prioritising future improvements by the Party.

  5. IIR Performance 2010 • Scoring: • 4 forGood • 2 for Moderate • 1 for limited • 0 for No Information

  6. Things I didn’t Like • IIR template not followed • Organised by Pollutant • Trend description mixed in with methodology section • No overview of completeness or Accuracy • Lack of Efs/AD/Method Description for Key Categories Country Specific Methods • Not including all sector in IIR

  7. IIR Awards • Most Comprehensive • Most Innovative • Best Looking • Best Country < 10m

  8. Nominations: Most Comprehensive • France • Croatia • Includes projections in time series plots • Shows Targets in Trend analysis Plots • National Energy Balance • UK • Good Coverage of almost all elements • Denmark • Lots of Detail

  9. Nominations: Most Innovative • France • Ominea • Germany • Wiki • Portugal • F 9.1 Recalculation Plots • AD Plots in IIR • Slovenia • Annotated trend graphs fig 2 etc • Latvia • Fig 3.2 Key Category Plot • Transport Activity Plots

  10. Nominations: Best Looking • Germany • Wiki • Netherlands • Fig 1.3, Trend Plots, Summary Tables, General layout • Finland • Maps & Plots

  11. Nominations: Best Country (Population < 10m) • Estonia • Cyprus • Croatia • Latvia