1 / 92

Soil Disturbance Workshop

Soil Disturbance Workshop. M.Curran, PhD,P.Ag. BCFS, Research. The path to “Pedo-righteousness”. Know your soil Know what you are doing to it Know the effects of this (on- and off-site) Adapt your practices (reliable process) over time as more knowledge becomes available

elwyn
Télécharger la présentation

Soil Disturbance Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Soil Disturbance Workshop • M.Curran, PhD,P.Ag. • BCFS, Research

  2. The path to “Pedo-righteousness” • Know your soil • Know what you are doing to it • Know the effects of this (on- and off-site) • Adapt your practices (reliable process) over time as more knowledge becomes available • “Science-based” management • None of this is new, but integration might be...

  3. Outline • Office for 1 hour: • FRPA • Monitoring • Field (return by 4 pm = leave 3 pm)

  4. Outline • Current Legislation - Disturbance types - review of types - Rece Surveys / Disturbance recog - Roadside Dist vs Ldg disturbance - Debris piles part of PAS? - Current Reference info - field cards, - Review dist requiring Rehab - - Stratification - Site prep disturbance

  5. Outline • Background • Soil disturbance concerns • Local soils research and results • FRPA • Soil conservation provisions in FRPA  • identify and discuss opportunities/issues for C&E (eg, MPB) • FREP soil protocol if of interest (eg low level detailed photos) • Briefly discuss harvesting strategies to manage soil disturbance (influence inspection approach

  6. Background: Forest Sciences • Branch and Regional forest science teams • Applied research, problem solving, extension, consulting • Decentralized, close to the scene of the action • Unique service in BC & talent rich • Respected in MOF and externally • A continued MOF core function

  7. F.S.P. Clients Public Licencee’s D.M.’s Field Services Primary Clients Industry Woodlot Public Public RMT BCTS Public

  8. Primary Focus (Earth Sciences) • Implementation and testing of policy related to soil and water conservation. • Done by: • Policy development support • Policy implementation support (Guidance documents, C&E) • Testing policy and developing tools • (Effectiveness, Validation)

  9. Recent Nelson soils work • Erosion control consultation/reviews of active fires • Work on Soil Conservation Framework and Surveys LMHs (guidance documents that include airphoto approach to monitoring) • FRPA Soils Leader during drafting and start of FREP • FREP Protocol development • Continued monitoring on LTSP • Promotion of a common approach to soil disturbance in North America (for FRPA)

  10. “Continual Improvement”(“Science-based resource mgt.) Strategic Direction Data/results Guidelines R & D Monitoring (C&E) Training OPERATIONS Best Mgt.Practices

  11. Provincial Soil Conservation issues Soil “foundation” affects Other Resources • Site productivity • “Hydrologic function” • Erosion and sedimentation • Organic matter • Rooting medium • Soil moisture Timber, Habitat supply Water Global Carbon Aesthetics Operations

  12. Soil Disturbance (a Proxy) • Any physical, biological, or chemical disturbance to the soil caused by ground-based equipment (operations) • May be inconsequential, beneficial, or detrimental depending on the net effect on growth limiting factors and hydrologic properties

  13. Soil Disturbance as a proxyfor productivity/hydrologic effects • We need at least 10 to 20 years data to draw conclusions about the effects • Therefore, we use soil disturbance as a proxy that we can observe and regulate at the time of harvesting, site preparation, etc. • However, when we discuss or read about “Soil Disturbance” there are inconsistent approaches and methods a common approach is needed.

  14. @ 15 YRS @ 10 YRS @ 3 YRS Mean Douglas-fir volume - Gates Creek (Smith & Wass, 1991; Wass & Senyk, 1999) 150 125 100 R / R % of volume on undisturbed soil S / NR 75 T / NS T / R 50 T / NR 25 0

  15. Net effect on tree growth • Resulting tree growth is sum of positive and negative effects • Common negative effects: • reduced aeration from compaction • loss of nutrients and organic matter • Common positive effects: • reduced competition • warmer soils

  16. Beneficial Disturbance • Foresters often create disturbance on purpose as site preparation to ameliorate seedling growth-limiting factors • Net effect would have to be positive • Growth is limited by most limiting factor • Identify and manage for these • Don’t compromise long-term productivity

  17. Processes leading to degradation: • Compaction • Displacement (min. soil; forest floor) • Erosion • Mass Wasting (cut/fill failures) • (Part of management framework)

  18. Compaction • Compaction and Puddling result in the alteration / loss of soil structure (architecture of pores) • Bulk Density increase (penetrability) • Infiltration decreases (more runoff) • Aeration decreases (less biological activity)

  19. Compaction • Controlling factors: texture, coarse fragments, forest floor depth/type, (soil depth, mineralogy) • Manageable factors: machine traffic, machine type/dynamic loading, seasonal soil conditions (wetness, snow, frost)

  20. Aeration Porosity (Nakusp)

  21. Mean Douglas-fir Volume • Both sites sandy-loam texture • BUT, Clay varies • Ratings need validation

  22. Soil Plasticity (Approx., CSSC) Very Plastic Plastic Slightly Plastic Non-Plastic

  23. Displacement • Displacement of fertile mineral topsoil and forest floor layers of concern • Loss of available nutrients • Loss of effective rooting volume • exposure of unfavourable subsoils • Loss of water holding capacity • Increased runoff, drainage diversion

  24. Displacement • Controlling factors: slope, topography, soil depth, subsoil type • Manageable factors: amount and extent of excavation, machine size/type, seasonal soil conditions (wetness, snow, frost)

  25. Outline • Background • Soil disturbance concerns • Local soils research and results • FRPA • Soil conservation provisions in FRPA  • identify and discuss opportunities/issues for C&E (eg, MPB) • FREP soil protocol if of interest (eg low level detailed photos) • Harvesting strategies to manage soil disturbance (can influence inspection approach if a good strategy appears to have been used)

  26. BC Soil disturbance stds • 1988 start, FPC in 1995, now FRPA • Disturbance types of concern evolved from bladed trails to compacted trails, ruts • Limits set in Silviculture Prescription (Site Plan) based on soil dist.hazards • Monitoring based on transects • Disturbance at sample point categorized

  27. Historical Disturbance Levels • late 70’s / early 80’s • over 20 % common • Interim Harv. guidelines (1988) • 13 % without rehab. • 1993 Harv. guidelines • 13 % WITH rehab. • 1995 FPC Act, now FRPA • 10 % AFTER rehab. “10 + 3”(5)

  28. Extra codes • Rehab = r, rX • Other machine traffic = M • Other scalps/gouges = O • 2 rut depths: - Ts, Td (deep) • Mike to provide total key….

  29. Only need to dig Repeated Machine Traffic • Machine traffic (compaction) • Altered soil structure or increased density relative to the surrounding soil • Puddling (and OR) • Compacted deposits of forest floor, fine slash and woody debris such that difficult to dig….

  30. FPRA Objectives for Soils • “Conserve the productivity and hydrologic function of soils.”

  31. Soil disturbance - FREP(pilotted sessions in Castlegar) • Are sensitive soils identified adequately? • Is access being minimized? • PAS • TAS • Roadside work areas • Other disturbance • Is drainage being restored/maintained?

  32. FRPA provision “Sensitive soils” Soil disturbance classes 5 and 10 % limit Can go over 5 % if rehab Conditions where higher Needs (validation as well) Publish former guidebooks, test and revise Soil conservation “framework” LMH; Test cumulative, other conditions like stumping and rehab tech/success FRPA support needed

  33. FRPA Soil Disturbance Stds(others for drainage, revegetation, etc.) • Permanent access 7 % or less • Temporary access up to 5 % • Sensitive Soils 5 % “disturbance” • Less-sensitive 10 % • Roadside work areas 25 % • Based on soil sensitivity

  34. Unfavourable growing media • Mike to provide total key….

  35. FRPA Soil Disturbance Stds(others for drainage, revegetation, etc.) • 35(7), 37 – mtl adverse effect **PJordan** • Drainage control provision • 39 • 79-81 need clarification • Environmental damage (alter ecosystem __(site series) - _define) • Landslide • Soil disturbance (30 % or higher on 0.2 ha?) • Changes to soil (mudbogging)

  36. Soil Issues in other Districts(?) • MPB salvage • Wet soils • Salvage permit… • Small Scale Salvage operations • Roadside work area issues • Opennings less than 1 ha

  37. Types of monitoring • Implementation (Compliance) • Did they meet the contract? • (speeding?) • Effectiveness • Contract and practices effective? • (are ticketting, signing, etc. reducing it) • Validation (research) • Underlying assumptions correct? • (speeding causes more fatalities there?)

  38. Compliance monitoring • Behaviour consistent with good practice? • Identify sensitive areas (SP or photos, reccies, soil maps, experience ___) • Walkthrough to check these • Run some transects to calibrate level of disturbance you are observing • Need to decide if a problem • If a problem you notify C&E and Licensee, call regional expert, speak to contractor about your concerns (educate them), random skidding not good______________ _______________

  39. Compliance monitoring • Behaviour consistent with good practice? • Identify sensitive areas (SP or photos, reccies, soil maps, experience ___) • Walkthrough to check these • Run some transects to calibrate level of disturbance you are observing • Need to decide if a problem • If a problem you call for second opinion (survey), report it to Licensee, document (measurements/observations) in a inspection report, stop work (imm. Env. Damage) / enforcement… _______________

  40. Compliance monitoring • Behaviour consistent with good practice? • Identify sensitive areas (SP or photos, reccies, soil maps, experience ___) • Walkthrough to check these • Run some transects to calibrate level of disturbance you are observing • Need to decide if a problem • If a problem you_survey, stop work, investigate, rehab plans?, _______________

  41. Compliance monitoring • Behaviour consistent with good practice? • Identify sensitive areas (SP or photos, reccies, soil maps, experience ___) • Walkthrough to check these • Run some transects to calibrate level of disturbance you are observing • Need to decide if a problem • If a problem you; escalating enforcement – compliance notice, big ugly?, rehab instructions via cooperation or determination________________

More Related