1 / 36

Overview of GMPLS interworking trials in Japan and NICT Kei-han-na GMPLS E-NNI trials

Overview of GMPLS interworking trials in Japan and NICT Kei-han-na GMPLS E-NNI trials. Prof. Naoaki Yamanaka Photonic Internet Lab. and Keio University. http://www.yamanaka.ics.keio.org http://www.pilab.org. Outline. Introduction GMPLS network research consortiums in Japan

emele
Télécharger la présentation

Overview of GMPLS interworking trials in Japan and NICT Kei-han-na GMPLS E-NNI trials

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Overview of GMPLS interworking trials in Japan and NICT Kei-han-naGMPLS E-NNI trials Prof. Naoaki YamanakaPhotonic Internet Lab. and Keio University http://www.yamanaka.ics.keio.orghttp://www.pilab.org

  2. Outline • Introduction • GMPLS network research consortiums in Japan • PIL: Photonic Internet Labs. • Multi-layer, Multi-route & Multi-vender experiment • MPLS / GMPLS Interworking • Protection and restoration • iPOP2005 GMPLS showcase and workshop • Largest open interworking testing event in ASIA • NICT KEI-HAN-NA open lab activities • GMPLS E-NNI interworking • Conclusion

  3. Domestic backbone traffic demand (Gb/s) 10k users 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Traffic Volume ADSL 40M ADSL 24M Traffic Volume FTTH 100M ADSL 12M ADSL 8M 2000 Broad band users Broad band 1500 1.5 ADSL 1000 ISDN 500 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 (Year)

  4. l2 … … Trend on Optical Switching network l １ l3 l１ l 2 WDM Transport l3 (Add / Drop) Research Target Optical packet switch network Flexibility WDM GMPLS Photonic router Optical Burst Switch Network WDM Wavelength control Semi-permanent Dynamic Switching Dynamic & cost reduction OXC WDM mesh network Reliability WDM ring network Throughput OADM OADM: Optical Add/Drop Multiplexer p-to-p WDM Transport OXC: Optical Cross-connect 2001 2005 2010 - (Year)

  5. What and Where is PIL and Kei-han-na ? • Kei-han-na is located over three prefectures in Japan Kansai area. • Kyoto, Osaka, and Nara • PIL is research consortium by 9 members Kei-han-na area Sapporo 1972 (NICT KDDI NTT 7 venders etc.) Nagano 1998 Tokyo 1964 PIL (Photonic Internet Lab)

  6. Outline • Introduction • GMPLS network research consortiums in Japan • PIL: Photonic Internet Labs. • Multi-layer, Multi-route & Multi-vender experiment • MPLS / GMPLS Interworking • Protection and restoration • iPOP2005 GMPLS showcase and workshop • Largest open interworking testing event in ASIA • NICT KEI-HAN-NA open lab activities • GMPLS E-NNI interworking • Conclusion

  7. Photonic-GMPLS Leading Edge Code Research Consortium : Photonic Internet Lab. (PIL) : Member Companies • Keio University • Nippon Telegraphand TelephoneCorporation • NEC Corporation • Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd. • Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. • Mitsubishi Electric Company • Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. • Hitachi, Ltd. • IP infusion

  8. Furukawa Electric Mitsubishi Electric Keio Univ. Oki Fujitsu NEC Hitachi NTT PIL Organization Photonic Internet Lab. Steering Committee PIL governance Standardization Strategy WG Technical arguments on the investigation and discussion of members' standardization proposals and the exploration of technical themes. Technical Test WG Technical testing of the leading-edge protocol codes developed in each company PIL member Companies IP infusion

  9. PIL activity framework Leading-edge code Testing leading edge code Contribution from A Running Code by A PIL Member A Implementation agreement by PIL Contribution from B Merging A, B and C Running Code by B Contribution from PIL Member B Proposing leading edge technology IETF Contribution from C Running Code by C OIF Member C Standard (RFC, IA) ITU-T Implemented

  10. Topics 1: Multi-layer (Multi-region), Multi-vender, and Multi-route GMPLS operation trial (2003) • Interoperability test of GMPLS control systems. • 5 members, 8 types of equipment controllers. Fujitsu NTT Mitsubishi NTT NEC Furukawa Route A Furukawa Route B Furukawa Fiber Wavelength TDM Mitsubishi Mitsubishi NEC NEC Packet

  11. R1 G1 G3 R3 G6 G1 G2 R2 G5 G7 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8 G9 Topics 2: MPLS/GMPLS interworking • Migration from conventional MPLS NW to GMPLS NW • Advertising GMPLS resources to conventional MPLS path • Routing…FA-LSP (GMPLS) >> Opaque or Router LSA (MPLS) • Signaling…Tunneling and Switching method • draft-oki-ccamp-gmpls-ip-interworking-06.txt (July 2005) G2 G3(adv) G1(adv) R1 GMPLS topology view IP topology view G4 R3 G6(adv) G7(adv) G5(adv) R2 G9 G8 GMPLS Network

  12. MPLS2003 PIL - MPLS/GMPLS interworking demonstration LSC PSC PSC MPLS MPLS LSC TDM TDM NTT NTT Furukawa Mitsubishi Furukawa NTT NTT LSC LSC PSC PSC MPLS Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node 5 Node 6 MPLS 40.2 40.4 40.5 40.3 TDM TDM LSC LSC MPLS MPLS 40.7 40.6 Node 7 Node 8 GMPLS NEC NEC

  13. Topics ３: GMPLS Restoration • 1+1 Protection • Hot standby for Fast restoration • 1:1 Shared restoration • Pre-determined backup route but resources are shared with other route …High-network utilization. • draft-pil-ccamp-extra-lsp-0x.txt by NTT NEC Mitsubishi Fujitsu Furukawa • Extra class LSP service using protecting resources in GMPLS networks Path1 Ingress1 Egress1 Shared resource Backup1 Ingress2 Egress2 Extra-traffic Backup2 Path2

  14. Video Conference HDTV Video on GMPLS network@ JGN Symposium 2004 • Multi-vender Gbit/sec GMPLS network • GMPLS signaling and routing (OSPF, RSVP-TE) • Super High-definition (SHD) digital cinema transfer • Automatic restoration • MPLS/GMPLS interworking High-definition digital cinema Broadband application GMPLS NW（Backbone） SHD Signal Control Lambda Cross connect Lambda Cross connect GbE GbE GbE GbE Large capacity IP Video Conference HIKARI router HIKARI router GbE Lambda Cross connect OC48 OC48 MPLS router MPLS router OC48 /GbE OC48 /GbE OC192 OC192 Lambda Cross connect TDM Cross connect TDM Cross connect GMPLS router GMPLS router IP/MPLS NW １ （Metro） IP/MPLS NW ２ （Metro） TDM NW OC192 HIKARI Wavelength NW Lambda Cross connect

  15. Oct 2004 IP/MPLS - GMPLS interworking in support of IP/MPLS to GMPLS migrationdraft-oki-ccamp-gmpls-ip-interworking-04.txt | 03.txt | 02.txt | 01.txt | 00.txt Requirements for GMPLS-based multi-region and multi-layer networksdraft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-reqs-00.txt Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Protocol Extensions for Multi-Region Networks (MRN) draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-extensions-00.txt July 2004 Requirements for Path Computation Element in GMPLS and IP/MPLS Networksdraft-oki-pce-gmpls-req-00.txt June 2004 Analysis of Misconnection Scenarios in GMPLS Networksdraft-shiomoto-ccamp-misconnection-analysis-00.txt April 2004 Generalized Traffic Engineering Protocoldraft-oki-ccamp-gtep-00.txt Feb. 2004 Generalized MPLS Architecture for Multi-Region Networksdraft-vigoureux-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-04.txt | 03.txt | 02.txt | 00.txt Extra class LSP service using protecting resources in GMPLS networksdraft-pil-ccamp-extra-lsp-02.txt01.txt | 00.txt Generalized MPLS Architecture for Multi-Region Networksdraft-vigoureux-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-04.txt | 03.txt | 02.txt | 00.txt Oct. 2003 Control plane architecture in GMPLS networksdraft-shiomoto-ccamp-cplane-architecture-00.txt Feb. 2003 Extensions to LMP for Flooding-based Fault Notificationdraft-soumiya-lmp-fault-notification-ext-00.txt RSVP extensions for gmpls restoration signalingdraft-shimano-imajuku-gmpls-restoration-00.txt Fault Notification Protocol for GMPLS-Based Recoverydraft-rabbat-fault-notification-protocol-02.txt | Signaling reverse-directional LSP in generalized MPLSdraft-matsuura-reverse-lsp-02.txt | 01.txt | 00.txt Optical Network Failure Recovery Requirementsdraft-czezowski-optical-recovery-reqs-01.txt | 00.txt Nov. 2002 Requirements for adding optical support to GSMPv3draft-ietf-gsmp-reqs-04.txt | Oct. 2002 draft-vigoureux-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-hpn-00.txt Path Quality Verification over an All-Optical Networkdraft-seno-path-quality-verification-00.txt June 2002 Generalized MPLS architecture for multi-region networks Multi-area multi-layer traffic engineering using hierarchical LSPs in GMPLS networksdraft-shiomoto-ccamp-multiarea-te-01.txt | Upstream label set support in RSVT-TE extensionsdraft-oki-ccamp-upstream-labelset-00.txt Requirements for using RSVP-TE in GMPLS signalingdraft-matsuura-gmpls-rsvp-requirements-01.txt | 00.txt Multilayer routing using multilayer switch capable LSRsdraft-imajuku-ml-routing-02.txt | 00.txt May 2002 Extensions to OSPF-TE for supporting shared mesh restorationdraft-yagyu-gmpls-shared-restoration-routing-00.txt Apr. 2002 OSPF Extensions in Support of Transport Plane Sub-networksdraft-maeno-ospf-optical-subnet-00.txt Feb. 2002 Extensions to RSVP-TE for Supporting Multiple Protection and Restoration Typesdraft-suemura-gmpls-restoration-signaling-00.txt Requirements of optical link-state information for traffic engineeringdraft-oki-ipo-optlink-req-00.txt Dec. 2001 Protection of Hierarchical LSPsdraft-suemura-protection-hierarchy-00.txt [Reference] Generalized MPLS Recovery Functional Specificationdraft-bala-gmpls-recovery-functional-01.txt Analysis of Generalized MPLS-based Recovery Mechanisms (including Protection and Restoration)draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-analysis-03.txt Recovery (Protection and Restoration) Terminology for GMPLSdraft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-terminology-01.txt Contribution example to international sanitation

  16. Overview of iPOP2005 Sponsored by ISOCORE and PIL Feb. 21・22, 2005 iPOP2005 General Chair Tomonori Aoyama, University of Tokyo Bijan Jabbari, ISOCORE

  17. iPOP2005　（2005.2.21-22) http://pilab.org/ipop2005/

  18. Overview of iPOP 2005 • Presentation sessions • 1 Opening session • 3 Special sessions (Invited) • 4 Technical sessions (Refereed) • Showcase • Next Generation networking technologies for IP and Optical networks • Trans-Pacific demonstration between ISOCORE site (VA, USA) and iPOP site (Tokyo, JPN) • Multiple carriers/vendors’ equipments • Exhibition • 20 exhibitors

  19. Sponsored by founded by 6 vendors and 1 service provider in 2002, is promoting R&D on next-generation photonic network control protocols based on photonic technologies for managed networks. is the leading technology validation lab in the next generation IP and optical networking. Its goal is to advance internetworking through technology validation and product verification and to promote development and rapid deployment of innovative networking technologies. Cooperate with is a non-profit organization contributing to the progress of info-communication technology to realize all optical ultra-high-speed networks. Private Line Provided by iPOP 2005 Sponsors

  20. Exhibitors Gold (11) Silver (8) Bronze

  21. X X X X X X X X X X X R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R iPOP Showcase Network SONET/SDH Ethernet Virtual data link GMPLS network in Japan GMPLS network in USA Avici Cisco Cisco Protocol viewer Juniper TOYO NTT-AT Sycamore ＰＣＥ Avici ＧＴＥＰ Fujitsu NTT Furukawa NTT Sycamore NTT NTT Juniper Mitsubishi Electric Sycamore Juniper NTT MPLS network MPLS network Hitachi NEC NTT KDDI Fujitsu Furukawa KDDI Furukawa Fujitsu NEC

  22. Participants of iPOP2005 (Pre-registration base) Government, Institute, 17 Others, 19 Academia, 22 Press, Consultant, 4 Carrier, 113 Vendor, 223 Total, 398

  23. iPOP2005atTokyo

  24. CFP iPOP2006Presentation, Exhibition, and Interop ShowcaseDead Line: Feb. 01, 2007 June 22-23 (tentative), 2006, at Tokyo JAPAN Sponsored by PIL, ISOCORE, PIF Details will be appeared at http://pilab.org/

  25. Future Target of PIL NICT Kei-han-na Plan 1 Field network test *Consideration of the field tests - NTT Musashino－Yokosuka -NICT Keihannna －Koganei - ISOCORE D.C.—PIL Tokyo Extension of Testing protocol Activity of PIL 2003 Confirmation of the running and reliability on equipment Confirmation of the running and reliability on NW Lab test phase Field test phase (2004) Service test phase (2005-) 7 Domestic companies • Plan 2 Contribution with major overseas vendors • * Consideration of the plans • Individual test with major overseas vendors (2003) • PIL joined in ISOCORE as group member (2004-) • - Sister site of PIL with ISOCORE (2004-) PIF Asia Overseas company ISOCORE USA

  26. Outline • Introduction • GMPLS network research consortiums in Japan • PIL: Photonic Internet Labs. • Multi-layer, Multi-route & Multi-vender experiment • MPLS / GMPLS Interworking • Protection and restoration • iPOP2005 GMPLS showcase and workshop • Largest open interworking testing event in ASIA • NICT KEI-HAN-NA open lab activities • GMPLS E-NNI interworking • Conclusion

  27. Where is Kei-han-na ? • Kei-han-na is located over three prefectures in Japan Kansai area. • Kyoto, Osaka, and Nara Sapporo 1972 Kei-han-na area Nagano 1998 Tokyo 1964

  28. Kei-han-na Info-Communication Open Laboratory Overview • The open laboratory was established at 2003 with the objective of carrying out research and development based studies. • Equipped with research facilities including the high-performance network technology. • Facilities are available to universities, manufacturers, research laboratories, venture companies, the local governments, etc. • merge research and development and contribute for providing personnel training to specialists. Creating new industries and services Human resource development

  29. Organization of the Research Promotion Council of Kei-han-na Open Laboratory

  30. Interoperability WG (IWG) members • NTT, NTT Communications • KDDI, KDDI R&D Labs. • NEC • Furukawa Network Solutions • Fujitsu, Fujitsu Lab. • Mitsubishi Electric • Hitachi, Hitachi Communications Technologies • Anritsu • Keio University • Prof. Naoaki Yamanaka • National Institute of Information and Communication Technology (NICT) 14 member organizations

  31. Load Balancer L2/L3 firewall L2/L3 firewall Load Balancer Kei-han-na target (Interface between ISPs/Carriers) User Domain User-Network Interface (UNI): operations between user and service provider control domains • External Network-to-Network Interface (E-NNI): • inter-control domain operation. • multi-domain operation for a single service provider • (b) multi-domain operation among different service providers • Internal Network-to-Network Interface (I-NNI): • intra-control domain operation E-NNI (b) UNI Service Provider A Admin Domain I-NNI Service Provider B Admin Domain Provider A has divided network into multiple control domains (e.g., vendor, geographic, technology, business unit, etc.) Provider B’s network is a single control domain E-NNI (a) Domain A1 Domain A2 I-NNI I-NNI

  32. Multi-layer network environment • PSC UNI, L2SC UNI, TDM UNI, LSC UNI, and FSC UNI are possible. GMPLS Network for Carrier-A UNI UNI PSC (PSC) (PSC) TDM LSC FSC (TDM) (TDM) (LSC) (LSC) (FSC) (FSC) • In the photonic network era, which layer becomes a border layer ?

  33. Multi-layer/multi-carrier GMPLS network • OXC/PXC is a border node. GMPLS Network for Carrier-A GMPLS Network for Carrier-B UNI UNI PSC PSC (PSC) (PSC) TDM TDM LSC LSC FSC FSC E-NNI (TDM) (TDM) (LSC) (LSC) (LSC) (FSC) (FSC) OXC/PXC

  34. Architecture of R&D network: JGN II ● 20/10 Gbit/s backbone of OXC/wavelength multiplexing network ● 63 access points nationwide ● Connection with overseas ● We have built 2 optical test beds for inspection research NW-A : R&D for network operation and management Kanazawa Fukuoka Otemachi 10G (1Gx8) Dojima Sapporo GMPLS inter-operability technology Kitakyusyu IT Center Kanazawa Kashima Dojima Fukuoka Okayama 10G base Tsukuba 1G NW-A : Test bed network for Tb/s class communication Sendai NICT Kitakyusyu IT Center Kanazawa Nagano 1G 10G 10G (1Gx8) NICT Kashima RC Fukuoka NICT Kobe 10G (1Gx8) 10G 10G (1Gx8) 10G 1G 10G 10G NICT Tsukuba RC 10G Dojima NICT Koganei Okayama Otemachi RC 10Gx2 1G 10G Dojima 1G Nagoya Kochi Tsukuba RC 1G Otemachi NICT Keihanna Center NICT Keihanna Center Okinawa Optical NW test bed possible to testify physically

  35. GMPLS Global Interoperability Verification Consortium collaboration working in Kei-han-na Open Laboratory C-Plane NW on JGN II OXC OXC OXC Router Router Router NICT Kei-han-na Dojima Otemachi NICT Koganei IWG XC-B KDDI PXC IWG XC-C Hitachi R-2 Mitsubishi PXC NTT R-2 NTT PXC Fujitsu PXC IWG R-1 KDDI R-1 IWG XC-A Furukawa R-1 Hitachi R-1 NEC XC IWG R-2 KDDI R-2 GbE 14 organizations from industry, university and government NTT R-1 STM-16 Fujitsu R-1 STM-64

  36. Conclusions • Target for GMPLS, next generation IP backbone protocol. • Universal control • Scalable service • Low-cost universal backbone • The Photonic Internet Lab. (PIL) was founded Autumn 2002 by 9 companies (7 venders, 1 service provider and 1 university) for realizing new photonic network control protocols based on photonic technologies for managed networks. • The Japanese government is supporting PIL. • NICT Kei-han-na Consortium is targeting GMPLS E-NNI protocol. It is demonstrated at MPLS 2005 booth.

More Related