1 / 11

S&I Framework Provider Directories Initiative All Hands Meeting

S&I Framework Provider Directories Initiative All Hands Meeting. August 26, 2011. Agenda. Announcements Weekly Accomplishments WG Updates. 1. 2. 3. Announcements. Meeting times proposed for Use Case 2 Workstreams Notes from the Use Case 2 calls posted on Data Model page.

emerald-england
Télécharger la présentation

S&I Framework Provider Directories Initiative All Hands Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. S&I FrameworkProvider Directories Initiative All Hands Meeting August 26, 2011

  2. Agenda Announcements Weekly Accomplishments WG Updates 1 2 3

  3. Announcements • Meeting times proposed for Use Case 2 Workstreams • Notes from the Use Case 2 calls posted on Data Model page

  4. Provider Directories - Summary of Weekly Accomplishments Use Case 1 Sub-Workgroup Accomplishments Use Case 2 Sub-Workgroup Accomplishments • Sub-workgroup leads committed to leading selected standard work (LDAP, HPD, and X12) • Work began to define entries on data elements definition, data type, and occurrence. • Established preliminary meeting times for the following SWG work streams: • Microdata • LDAP x.500 • IHE HPD • X12N 274 • Substantive progress was made in coming to an informal consensus regarding the DNS/ LDAP hybrid approach • Work completed on Implementation guidelines for publishing and discovering LDAP services using DNS SRV Record. SWG will review work on the next call. • Sub-Workgroup recommendations can be accessed here

  5. Use Case 1 - Sub-Workgroup Update Accomplishments • Progress was made in coming to an informal consensus regarding the DNS/ LDAP hybrid approach • Recommendations that were reviewed by the group can be accessed here • Statements in green have reached informal consensus, statements in blue are comments to address as a group, and black statements have yet to be reviewed Next Steps • Provide commentary regarding LDAP X.500 Recommendation Review • Provide commentary regarding UML Classifier X.500 LDAP diagram • Continue to review the review the proposed Harmonization Statement for Query for Digital Certificate Use Case for Direct Project Use Case • Develop implementation guidance

  6. Use Case 2 - Sub-Workgroup Update Accomplishments • Doodle polls were administered and aggregated to determine SWG meeting times • Work began as a full workgroup to define entries in the data element (definition , data type, and occurrences) • Four sub-workgroups have been established and assigned leads to analyze and map the respective standard to data elements from Use Case 2 (Microdata, LDAP X.500, IHE HPD, X12N 274) Next Steps • Continue defining data elements & capturing their definition/data type/ occurrences • Begin parsing out work within sub-workgroups to evaluate the dataset mapping • Identify additional volunteers (perhaps from other industries) with more relevant experience • Sub- workgroup leads need to be determined for Microdata • Review data model spreadsheet modified by SWG leads

  7. Volunteer Lead: TBD Use Case 2: Microdata Workstream Accomplishments: • Proposed SWG Meeting Time: Wednesdays from 3:00pm - 4:00pm EST • Committed Volunteers: Bob Dieterle, Ken Pool, John Moehrke , Lin Wan, Lester Keepper, Ernest Grove, Vince Lewis Next Steps • Preliminary workplan identified: • Bing/schema.org team: reviews and provides feedback on existing mapping spreadsheet • S&I team: Creates an extension of the schema.org ontologies • Bing/schema.org team: reviews and provides feedback on the extension(s) • S&I team: Creates a mockup of a provider page using the extended schema • Bing team: Creates the consumer search experience page • S&I team: creates the Javascript to parse and render the microdata

  8. Volunteer Lead: Peter Bachman Use Case 2 - LDAP X.500 Workstream Accomplishments: • Proposed SWG Meeting Time: Tuesdays from 11:00am-12:00pm EST • Committed Volunteers: Bob Dieterle, Ken Pool, John Moehrke, Lin Wan, Lester Keepper, Ernest Grove Next Steps • Begin parsing out work to evaluate the dataset mapping

  9. Volunteer Lead (s): Karen Witting/Bob Dieterle Use Case 2 - IHE HPD Workstream Accomplishments: • Proposed SWG Meeting Time: Fridays from 11:00am - 12:00pm EST • Committed Volunteers: Bob Dieterle, Ken Pool, John Moehrke, Terri Skalabrin, Lester Keepper, Ron Sawdey , Karen Witting, Lin Wan, Ernest Grove, Vince Lewis Next Steps • Establish sub-workgroup meeting times • Begin parsing out work to evaluate the dataset mapping • Review and evaluate Karen Witting’s initial work on HPD mapping

  10. Volunteer Lead: Gail Kocher Use Case 2 - X12N 274 Workstream Accomplishments: • Proposed SWG Meeting Time: Fridays from10:00am - 11:00am EST • Committed Volunteers: Bob Dieterle, Ken Pool, Gail Kocher, Jeff Ice, Ernest Grove, Rachel Foerster Next Steps • Establish sub-workgroup meeting times • Begin parsing out work to evaluate the dataset mapping • Does the SWG have enough expertise in the X12 arena to adequately map standards? • Contact Gail Kocher to solicit additional volunteers

  11. Virtual Round Questions, Comments, concerns?

More Related