1 / 34

Using Literacy Data

Using Literacy Data. Tulsa Public Schools. DIBELs Subtests. Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF) Word Use Fluency (WUF) Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) Retell Fluency (RTF). Phoneme Segmentation Fluency (PSF) Initial Sound Fluency (ISF) Letter Naming Fluency (LNF). DIBELs Data. Principals:

Télécharger la présentation

Using Literacy Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Using Literacy Data Tulsa Public Schools

  2. DIBELs Subtests • Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF) • Word Use Fluency (WUF) • Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) • Retell Fluency (RTF) • Phoneme Segmentation Fluency (PSF) • Initial Sound Fluency (ISF) • Letter Naming Fluency (LNF)

  3. DIBELs Data • Principals: • Completion Reports • Compare Report • Teachers: • Small group advisor • Send Home reports

  4. Completion Report

  5. Comparing Measures Report

  6. Small groups

  7. Small group activities

  8. Item level advisor

  9. Item-level advisor

  10. DIBELS are Indicators • DIBELS is a toothpick • DIBELS are not designed to provide an exhaustive assessment • DIBELS provides an efficient indicator of essential literacy skills acquisition like a toothpick provides an efficient way to tell if the cake is baked. • If the toothpick has dough on it, what should we do?

  11. Bake the Whole Cake, Don’t Just Cook One Place! • Using a torch to cook only the place we checked with the toothpick would not produce a very satisfying cake!

  12. Alphabetic Principle:Torching the cake Artificial ways to raise the NWF score without actually teaching the skill are like torching the cake – they don’t lead to better reading outcomes. • Memorizing and practicing the nonsense words on the next DIBELS assessment. Knowing tob dos et tuj kej does not help children learn to read better. • Telling children not to recode (read the words as a word) but instead just to say the letter sounds as fast as they can. (Recoding is the point of NWF) • Giving extra time or assistance

  13. Accuracy and Fluency with Connected Text:Torching the cake Artificial ways to raise the ORF score without actually teaching the skill are like torching the cake – they don’t lead to better reading outcomes. • Practicing the next DIBELS probe so they can read it fast does not help children learn to read better. • Encouraging children to read only the words they know: The and a an …. • Telling children to read as fast as they can. • Sending the passage home to practice. • Start reading the passage at the third sentence. • Giving extra time or assistance.

  14. Instructional Progression for Decoding

  15. Progress Monitoring • Weekly or biweekly assessments for those students who scored below benchmark and are receiving an intervention • Progress monitoring provides data regarding the intervention and allows for immediate changes in instruction, if necessary. • What to do when a students flat lines red • Starting at a lower level, administer subtests to identify deficiencies • Plan instruction to fill in gaps • Progress monitor that subtest to measure growth

  16. Instructional Progression for Decoding

  17. Lexile Data

  18. What is the Lexile Framework? • An educational tool that links text and readers under a common metric known as Lexiles. • Allows educators to forecast the level of comprehension a reader is expected to experience with a particular text • Most commonly used reading measure • Over 19 million students receive Lexile scores through commercial and state assessments • Over 100,000 books and tens of millions of article have Lexile measures

  19. Lexile Measure • A Lexile is a standard score developed by MetaMetrics • Matches a student’s reading ability with difficulty of text material • Interpreted as the level of book that a student can read with 75% comprehension • 75% comprehension is the level identified by experts as offering the reader a certain amount of comfort and yet still offering a challenge Reading Ability Text Complexity

  20. The Lexile Scale • Lexiles typically range from 200 for beginning readers to 1700 for advanced readers • Lexile text below 200L represents beginning-reading material, and a student’s Lexile score may have a number in the 100s or the code of BR. BR is a code that stands for Beginning Reading. • Applies to both reader ability and text difficulty • When reader and text measures are the same, the student is expected to read with 75% comprehension Can be used to track reading growth over time

  21. SRI (Lexile) Identifies • Identify struggling readers. • Apply as a universal screener and progress monitoring tool. • Monitor progress toward AYP goals. • Monitor effectiveness of instruction. • Establish obtainable and realistic growth goals for students. • Indicate expected performances on state tests.

  22. How to Use Lexiles • It is recommended that readers choose texts within their Lexile range. • A Lexile range is 50L above and 100L below a student’s reported Lexile measure. • Practice with a variety of texts. • Use Lexiles to set goals.

  23. Using Lexiles in the Classroom • Teachers can use Lexiles to help them: • Develop individualized or classroom reading lists tailored to provide appropriately challenging reading. • Enhance thematic teaching by building a bank of titles at varying levels that support the theme, but also allows all students to participate successfully in the theme with material at their own reading level. • Sequence materials, for example by increasing the difficulty of read-aloud books throughout the year. • Source: http://www.lexile.com/m/uploads/downloadablepdfs/Lexiles-in-the-Classroom.pdf

  24. Using Lexiles in the Classroom Teachers can use Lexiles to help them: • Develop a reading folder that goes home with students and comes back for weekly review. • Folder might contain: • a reading list of books within the student’s Lexile range • reports of recent assessments • a form for parents to record reading that occurs at home. • Vary reading difficulty of material to the situation: • Choose texts lower in the student’s Lexile range when factors make the reading situation more challenging, threatening or unfamiliar. • Select texts at or above the student’s range to stimulate growth when a topic is of extreme interest to a student, or when you will be giving additional support such as background teaching or discussion. • Source: http://www.lexile.com/m/uploads/downloadablepdfs/Lexiles-in-the-Classroom.pdf

  25. the Find A Book Toolhttp://lexile.com/fab/

  26. What if a book or document isn’t in the Lexile database? • Use the Lexile Analyzer – it’s free, but you must register. • Create a text document (file extension is .txt) with multiple 175-word slices from the book or document. • Submit via the Lexile Analyzer. http://lexile.com/analyzer/

  27. More Instructional Uses of Lexiles Teachers can use Lexiles to: • Set measurable goals for instruction and special intervention programs • Monitor progress of various reading programs • Make parents “partners to the classroom” by giving them a tool for selecting appropriate reading material for their children (e.g., Summer Reading Lists, visiting library, etc.) • Help students set goals for themselves and use annual OCCT results to see if they have progressed towards their goals. • Source: http://www.lexile.com/m/uploads/downloadablepdfs/Lexiles-in-the-Classroom.pdf

  28. More Instructional Uses of Lexiles Lexiles can help teachers: • Adjust materials to the purpose of reading. • For increased fluency and automaticity, teacher selects text that measures well below reader ability. • As a strategy for teaching students how to attack “hard” text, the teacher selects text that measures above reader ability. • Source: http://www.lexile.com/m/uploads/downloadablepdfs/Lexiles-in-the-Classroom.pdf

  29. Using Lexiles in Media Centers and Public Libraries Media specialists and librarians can assist classroom instruction by • Helping to develop individualized or classroom reading lists tailored to provide appropriately challenging reading. • Guiding teachers in selecting a bank of titles at varying levels that support an instructional thematic unit. This allows all students to participate successfully in the theme with material at their own reading level. • Locating and sequencing materials for classroom use. For example, increasing the difficulty of read-aloud books throughout the year. • Source: https://d1jt5u2s0h3gkt.cloudfront.net/m/uploads/downloadablepdfs/Lexiles-in-the-Library.pdf

  30. Relationship of Lexiles & Grade Levels • Column 2 shows the range of Lexiles in which the middle 50% of readers fall at a grade level. 25% of students fall below this range and 25% above. • Column 3 shows the typical range of reading material at a grade level. These are based on a 2009 study. • Column 4 are "stretch" text measures (defined in 2010 through studies related to the development of the Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts ) and represent the demand of text that students should be reading to be college and career ready by the end of Grade 12.  http://www.lexile.com/about-lexile/grade-equivalent/grade-equivalent-chart/

  31. Comparison of Various Reading Level Models

  32. Influences on student learningJohn Hattie 1999-2009 – research from 180,000 studies covering almost every method of innovation Feedback 0.73 • Teacher-Student Relationships 0.72 • Mastery Learning 0.58 • Challenge of Goals 0.56 • Peer Tutoring 0.55 • Expectations 0.43 • Homework 0.29 • Aims & Policies of the School 0.24 • Ability Grouping 0.12

  33. Setting Goals • There is strong evidence that challenging, achievable goals influence achievement, provided the individual is involved in setting them. • Locke & Latham (1990) found that achievement is enhanced to the degree that teachers set challenging, rather than “do your best” goals, relative to the students’ present competencies. There is a direct linear relationship between the degree of goal difficulty and performance . • Goals have a self-energizing effect if they are appropriately challenging as they can motivate students to exert effort in line with the difficulty or demands of the goal. • Commitment to the goals helps, but is not necessary for goal attainment – except for Special Needs students, where commitment makes a major difference.

More Related