290 likes | 567 Vues
Great Surveys: Spectral and Temporal Frontiers Adam Aaardvark-Zulkarni, Department of Astronomy or Adam Zulkarni-Aardvark, Department of Physics, California Institute of Technology Some Well known Adages
E N D
Great Surveys: Spectral and Temporal Frontiers Adam Aaardvark-Zulkarni, Department of Astronomy or Adam Zulkarni-Aardvark, Department of Physics, California Institute of Technology
Some Well known Adages • Science progresses through funerals (Max Planck?) • Given a telescope/instrument with entirely new capabilities even a sufficiently idiotic astronomer can make a sufficiently great discovery (Kulkarni) • Those who can think creatively do. Those who have have gone past that point (or never had it) do surveys (name with held by request)
Motivations • Catalog of the Sky • Palomar Sky Survey • Search for variables • Harvard Sky Patrol • Explore the Sky (New Bands) • Early Cambridge Surveys • UHURU (classical X-rays) • IRAS (long wavelength IR) • ROSAT All Sky Survey (soft X-rays)
Issues • Storage: Physical Medium • Glass plates (Palomar Sky Survey) • Journals (Hat Creek HI surveys) • Access: • Basic access (e.g. NVSS) • Reduced data (e.g. IRAS, ROSAT)
Digital Surveys • 2MASS • Defined the gold standard for imaging surveys • Sloan Digital Sky Survey • Defined the gold standard for a complex survey/experiment • Parkes Multibeam Survey • Found more pulsars than the entire world output since t=0
Experiments & Quests • CMB astronomy brought rigorous experimental planning to astronomy • Large number of experiments are now geared up to attack • Cosmography (Ia SN, WL, BAO) • Cosmology (EOR) • Large scale structure (Clusters, WL) • Quests: Extra-solar planets • Transit experiments, COROT, Kepler
Drivers • Technology • Semi-conductor industry (Moore’s law) • Optical Astronomy • Radio Astronomy • Detectors (e.g. IR, sub-mm) • Build the next instrument • To Acceptable Cost • To Aspiration
Capital cost: Software Running costs: hardware Data: inexpensive Analysis: very expensive The World has become Upside Down
Full Sky Surveys • This decade will see full sky surveys from radio through GeV • Basic Issue: • Basic Access • Cross-catalog Access • Sophisticated Queries • Falls squarely in the VO framework
Exponential Growth+Synergy=Accelerating Returns • Moore’s law: performance is exponential • Kurzweil claimed that the performance of electronics (over 100 years) was accelerating (decreasing e-fold timescale) • Broadly speaking: what happens when two exponentially technologies are applied to the same problem ? Law of accelerating returns
Exciting Possibilities • New avenues for discovery (data mining) • Possibilities for discoveries that lie at the interface of previously poorly connected subjects (e.g. LIGO and EM astronomy, UHECR and regular astronomy) • Holistic approach • Complete SEDs • High quality statistics • deeper insight including numerical astrophysics • Rare Objects
Are we ready? • Poor tools • No efficient tools to intelligently analyze multiple data bases • Community not well trained • Poor incentive for developing tools • Deep concerns about career paths for software astronomers
Followup: Shortage • Followup is the key for surveys (as opposed to self-contained experiments) • Spectroscopy is usually critical • Transient objects: need light curves • Radio: a major bottleneck (cf GRB astronomy)
Projects: Soon and Proposed • Optical Imagers: Raptor, PanStarr, Palomar Transient Factory, SkyMapper, VST, One degree Imager,HyperSuprimeCam, Dark Energy Camera, PS4, LSST, JDEM • IR Imagers: UKIRT, VISTA, Subaru • Spectroscopic Surveys: SDSS, LAMOST, WFMOS • Radio: ATA, EVLA, LOFAR, EOR1, EOR2, …, LWA, ASKAP • Sub-millimeter: Scuba-2, SPT, WISE, LMT, CCAT
Reality Check • Aspirations far exceed fiscal reality • Astronomers must identify cost-savings • Data reduction pipelines • Standard Archiving • Eliminate multiple surveys for similar objectives
Why is this field interesting? • Transients have traditionally played a major role in the history of astronomy • Algol, Cepheids, Supernovae • Explosion in GRB astronomy is a direct demonstration of accelerating returns • Phase space for discovery is extremely large (rare objects, fast events)
Transients: experimental planning is necessary • All surveys claim to provide value to other areas of astronomy • Mostly the claims are dubious • Will likely fail for transient object astronomy • Community focus has been on discovering events (cf LSST, PanStarrs). BUT • Payoff is really in filtering and followup • Long term value is in rates and statistics • Needs experiment planning
Critical Issues • Sociology • Reward Structure • Software • Structure of Surveys How do we make progress?
Balance between Surveys and PI science • Big difference between astronomy and physics • Cf Fermi-Dirac • Astronomy is the art of what is possible • We should sharply distinguish great questions (physics) and great quests (astronomy) • The balance is dangerously poor • Train to be a jaguar and eat up all the hedgehogs and outrun the fox
The Mother of All Surveys • All telescopes around the world to observe four regions of the sky for an entire year • The cadence, filter choices etc are designed to minimize operating costs • Resulting survey will serve all areas of astronomy (thanks to the diversity of the approaches)!