610 likes | 735 Vues
This session discusses the Electoral College, presidential campaign strategies, and institutional dynamics in the electoral process. Key topics include potential changes to the Electoral College, like the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, and the implications of historical realignments in U.S. politics. We explore voter behavior shifts, party dynamics, and the significance of key elections in shaping political landscapes. Join to analyze these critical aspects and forecast future electoral trends on May 2, 2013.
E N D
The Future May 2, 2013
Opportunities to discuss course content • Today 11-2 • No Office Hours Tomorrow or During Finals Week • Turn papers in by 11:59AM to Doyle 226B
Learning Objectives • Discuss the Electoral College and the strategy of presidential campaigns • Identify and describe the formal and informal institutions involved in the electoral process
It will Survive The Electoral College
District Plan • Maine and Nebraska use this system • Popular with the party that Controls the House of Representatives • Could pass without an amendment
National Popular Vote Interstate Compact • Would provide a back door to 538 • Popular after 2000 • Momentum has Slowed • Now largely partisan
Why No Change • To Difficult to Amend the Constitution • More hits than Misses • The Fear of Unanticipated Consequences
The Republicans • Didn’t Like their 2008 Rules • Didn’t Like their 2012 Rules • Will Reevaluate for 2016
The Conventions • The late convention is no longer a financial positive • Low Ratings, Low Excitement • 3 Days and earlier Dates
Big Money • Outcome • Corporations have stayed quiet • Develop new strategies • Big $ likely to stay
Short Term Deviations • Congressional Elections • Weaker partisan ties • Poor challengers • These can result in a landslide for one party
What is a Realignment • A Durable shift in voting Patterns • The New Party Kills the Old • Majority Parties become minorities
Who Switches in a Realignment • Hard Cores do not switch • Independents do • New Voters • Weak partisans become strong Partisans
What Causes a Realignment • Economic or social crisis • Failure of the party to interpret change • A changed electorate
The Policy Implications • A mandate for change • Major New Policies • Continued electoral success
Options for the Losers • Ignore the issue • Try to absorb it • Change
Kinds of Realignments • Secular Realignments- happen over time • Regional Realignments • Critical Elections
VICTORY Defeat same Maintaining Deviating Converting Realigning change Types of Election Majority Party
A Realigning Election • The Actual Critical Election • 1800 • 1860 • 1896 • 1930 • High Intensity • High Turnout
A Maintaining Election • A boring election • The party in power remains in power • 1936, 1940, 1944, 1948, 1960
Deviating Election • The Out party does well • No shift in long term partisanship • Caused by short-term factors • 1912, 1916, 1952, 1956
Converting Election • The out party is gaining seats • The precursor to a realignment (1930) • The majority party keeps control.
Supporters of A Realignment • 2006 • 2008 • 2012 Does it meet the criteria?
Criteria • A realignment gives rise to new dominant voter cleavage over interests ideological tendencies or issues • A realignment is preceded or contemporaneous with a good showing by a third party
Criteria II • Voter Turnout is higher in a realigning election • Electoral Realignments bring about long spans of unified party control of the government
Criteria III • A realignment brings about sharp and durable changes in the electorate Realignments do not take vacations
A Shrinking margin of Victory • Obama’s margin shrank from 2008 by 2% • Only 1.3% higher than Bush’s Re-election
The Parties have been Competitive Republicans Democrats President- 76, 92, 96, 08,12(20 years) Senate- 1973-1980, 1989-1994, 2007-2015 (22 years) House- 1972-1994, 2007-2010 (26 years) • President- 72, 80, 84, 88 2000, 2004 (24 years) • Senate- 1981-1986, 1995-2006 (18 years) • House- 1995-2006, 2011-2015- 16 years
Bad and Good News The Republicans
Bad News • Republican Policy wars • The lack of New Ideas • The Demographic Bubble
Outreach does not need to be massive • They do not need to win all the votes • They may benefit from an increasingly diverse democratic Party • Can use State legislators as a farm team
Good and Bad News The democrats
The Durability of the Obama Coalition • It weathered a slow economy • A bad midterm • Divisive policy initiatives
Advantages • Demographics • African Americans • Latinos • Asian-Americans • The Movement of Professionals to the Democrats • In 2012 • Women moved Iowa and New Hampshire • Latinos Moved Colorado, Florida and Nevada • African Americans moved Ohio and Virginia
Advantages • Better Ground Game • The Need for Big Government
Problems • The Absence of President Obama • Is it a Democratic Coalition, or an Obama Coalition?
Disadvantages: the 2014 Election • Democrats are facing the 6-year itch • The President’s Party Loses Seats in the midterms • A referendum on the president • A referendum on the economy
How You Know it is going to bad • Exposure and Coattails • Presidential Approval • Economic Growth
The Role of History • The Third Term is increasingly rare • 11 Wins and 12 Losses since Washington • 2 Wins and 6 Losses in the past 100 years
The Problem of an 8-year President • Personal Popularity does not Carry-over to the new nominee (Unpopularity does) • The Democratic Candidate’s Fate is Tied to Obama’s • He/She will Held Responsible for His Policies