90 likes | 215 Vues
This study investigates the simulations of Advanced Data Transfer (ADT) generated loss patterns related to beam positioning at the pickups BPMCA.7R4 and BPMC.9R4. Utilizing MAD-X simulations, we analyze beam intensity, energy parameters, and the effects of MKQ kicks at various turns. We observe amplitude characteristics and closed-orbit bump maximums affecting the MQ.12L6.B2. Emphasis is placed on delineating the relationship between beam parameters, loss patterns, and time structure to enhance understanding of beam dynamics.
E N D
MKQ and ADT part • Beam position at ADT pickups: • BPMCA.7R4 • BPMC.9R4 • MKQ kick (1 turn) • ~1 ms after the MKQ kick: • ADT kicks • Beam intensity: • 8.2e8 protons ADT MKQ ADT MKQ
Beam parameters Energy = 3999.840 GeV Q1 = 64.267 Q2 = 59.3057 dq1=1.55 dq2=2.55
Experiment vs. MADX • 47 turns: • Orb. bump • 1 turn: • MKQ kick • 11 turns: • No MKQ • 109 turns: • ADT kick (sin) amplitude: 0.4436e-6 / 10 • 32 turns: • ADT kick amplitude, max: 0.4436e-6 Q1 = 64.267 Q2 = 59.3057 dq1=1.55 dq2=2.55
Experiment vs. MADX • 47 turns: • Orb. bump • 1 turn: • MKQ kick • 11 turns: • No MKQ • 109 turns: • ADT kick (sin) amplitude: 0.4436e-6 / 10 • 32 turns: • ADT kick amplitude: 0.4436e-6 / 4.5 Q1 = 64.278 Q2 = 59.302 dq1=2.0 dq2=2.0
Beam parameters 15 February, 23:24 Energy = 3999.840 GeV βBWS (madx) = 123.51 βBWS (madx) = 404.55 <σBWS,x>= 1.23e-4 <σBWS,y>= 1.16e-3 εn,x = 5.19e-7 εn,y = 1.41e-5 Q1 = 64.278 Q2 = 59.302 dq1=2.0 dq2=2.0
Beam screen and the closed-orbit bump 17.15 • Maximum of the bump at the MQ.12L6.B2 • Offset at the MQ.12L6.B2: 4.3 σ (=distance from the reference orbit ~2.14 cm) • MCBH.14L6 • MCBH.12L6 • MCBCH.10L6 • MQ.12L6 • MS.12L6 22.00
MCBH.12L6 MQ.12L6 MS.12L6 Beam Sliced into ~ 1cm lenses