1 / 13

Cross System Financing Strategies Learning Network Session #1-Homework

Cross System Financing Strategies Learning Network Session #1-Homework. Iowa Team Iowa Department of Public Health Janet Zwick , Deputy Director DeAnn Decker , Bureau Chief Magellan Kathy Stone , Associate Executive Director.

erna
Télécharger la présentation

Cross System Financing Strategies Learning Network Session #1-Homework

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cross System Financing StrategiesLearning Network Session #1-Homework Iowa Team Iowa Department of Public Health Janet Zwick, Deputy Director DeAnn Decker, Bureau Chief Magellan Kathy Stone, Associate Executive Director

  2. 1. What are the most significant client, family, agency and system-specific outcomes of your state/county’s participation in this project? • Statewide system of integrated co-occurring disorders services • No wrong door • No disparity in reimbursement between MH and SA services

  3. #1 Continued • Stable, competent, professional workforce • Electronic information system that supports communication and service planning • Global perspective of recovery and hope • Every Iowan means EVERY IOWAN!

  4. 2. Details of proposed strategy that you have developed and how it benefits your state/county.  Statewide strategy involved stakeholders at all levels  Plan implemented with ongoing monitoring and support

  5. 3. Who supported your project and how has the project aided your supporters? • All stakeholders: consumers/clients, families, providers, state and local government, policy-makers, payers • Met the shared goal of a statewide system of integrated services for co-occurring disorders

  6. 4. What were key products and deliverables developed during the learning sessions? • Identification and piloting of brief MH/SA screening instruments • Transition plan and training that supported providers • Public awareness campaign

  7. 4. Which ones were most useful and why were they useful? Transition plan and training that supported providers and the public awareness campaign were most useful, because both increased buy in and collaborative system development.

  8. 5. Have there been any proposed budget changes in your project, your department and/or at the agency/county or state levels? More dollars for services with specific earmark for workforce development.

  9. 5. Continued: How have they affected your project? Integrated services, resulting in better use of existing dollars.

  10. 5. Continued: What sources of financial and other resource support might be impacted? Training providers and support system transition.

  11. 6. Have any statutory changes come out of your project and, if so, have they helped or hurt? • Licensure changes remove barriers to provider service delivery • “Deemed status” allows quick program credentialing for MH and SA • Practitioner credentialing supports establishment of co-occurring professionals

  12. 7. What projected staffing is needed to implement the changes your project has created? • Training focused on co-occurring provider development • Transition of SSA

  13. 8. When will your project be “completed”? December 2008

More Related