1 / 21

Individuals with Disabilities and Sheltering During Hurricane Ike

Individuals with Disabilities and Sheltering During Hurricane Ike. Laura M. Stough, PhD Elizabeth H. Ducy, M.Ed Texas A&M University. Sheltering Experience. Sheltering is an integral part of emergency management Certain populations have been found to be vulnerable to the effects of disaster

errol
Télécharger la présentation

Individuals with Disabilities and Sheltering During Hurricane Ike

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Individuals with Disabilities and Sheltering During Hurricane Ike Laura M. Stough, PhD Elizabeth H. Ducy, M.Ed Texas A&M University

  2. Sheltering Experience • Sheltering is an integral part of emergency management • Certain populations have been found to be vulnerable to the effects of disaster • Female head of households • Those whose first language is not English • Individuals from ethnically and culturally diverse groups • Individuals with disabilities • Vulnerability to disaster and its aftermath is socially constructed and is best viewed as social vulnerability

  3. http://www.nod.org/katrinaphotos/katrina9.jpg AP Photo/Eric Gay

  4. Literature on Sheltering Report on Special Needs Assessment for Katrina Evacuees (SNAKE) Project (2005) • Four “rapid assessment teams” deployed during the first week of September 2005 • Conducted interviews and observations in shelters and emergency operations centers in four Gulf States • Documented accessibility issues and barriers to services in shelters

  5. Literature on Sheltering Brodie, Weltzien, Altman, Blendon, Benson (2006) • Surveyed residents of Houston area shelters after Hurricane Katrina • People with a physical disability reported not being able to evacuate • Disproportionate number of shelter residents were African American, low income and uninsured

  6. Aftermath of Hurricane Ike • Storm surge of 17 feet • 74 deaths in Texas • 1.9 million evacuees • Over 2 million without power • 40,614 in public shelters (FEMA)

  7. Current Operations Decision Window Execution Window State Evacuation Sequence Evacuation Special Needs General Pop Contraflow Begins (+/-) Sep 11/11:00 AM H–120 H–96 H-72 H–48 H–36 H-24 H Hour SAR H-Hour = Arrival of Tropical Force or 39 mph winds on the coast (Sep 12, 11:00 AM)

  8. Evacuation to Special Needs Shelters

  9. Dallas Convention Center Shelter

  10. Dallas Convention Center Shelter

  11. Dallas Convention Center Shelter • Shelter had a maximum capacity of 1300, which was filled on Friday the 12th • Several small bus loads of individuals with medical needs / disabilities arrived on Thursday and early Friday morning at the shelter • Contacted through 211 evacuation registry • No confirmed shelter destination • Many “Medical Special Needs” shelters were full • Special case of dialysis patients

  12. Dallas Convention Center Shelter

  13. Disability Assessment Survey • Questions of interest: • What were the current needs of individuals with disabilities and their families in this sheltering situation? • What were the physical and psychological impacts of the evacuation and sheltering experience? • How many individuals with disabilities were in the general shelter population?

  14. Disability Assessment Study • Instrument: • 27 items on the survey • 8 items were demographic in nature • 7 items were disability-related • 3 items were used to determine if the individual was classified as having a disability • Procedure: • Each person in the designated special needs area were interviewed using all questions on the survey • All individuals in Section “B” of the shelter were contacted

  15. Disability Assessment Survey • Data Collected: • Combined special needs beds 46 • Individuals with disabilities 36 • Companions/family members 10 • General population beds 206 • Individuals with disabilities 17 • Companions/family members TOTAL CONTACTS + INTERVIEWS 252

  16. Disability Assessment Study 2008 Congreso Ingeniería Civil – Costa Rica 2008 Congreso Ingeniería Civil – Costa Rica

  17. In Summary • Only 30-35% of the estimated population with special needs in this shelter were identified by the Red Cross • All of those assessed in the special needs section either 1) had a disability, or 2) were a caretaker, or 3) were the family member of someone with a disability • An estimated 8.3% of those in the general shelter section had a disability that significantly limited at least one ADL (Activity of Daily Living) • In this non-medical special needs shelter 11.5-12.1% of the total population had a disability

  18. In Conclusion • Sheltering and evacuation procedures need to include the needs of people with disabilities in the general population • It is not enough for shelters to be physically accessible but “service accessible” • Shelters need to plan for “universal design” services so that the needs of a full cross-section of the population are included

  19. Contact Information Laura M. Stough, Ph.D. Elizabeth H. Ducy, M.Ed. Project REDD at redd.tamu.edu

More Related