1 / 18

Water Buyback in the Segura River Basin: A Policy Option for Restoring Balance and Protecting the Environment

This paper explores the concept of water buyback as a policy option to restore environmental flows and compensate farmers in the semi-arid Segura River Basin in SE Spain. The research offers a benchmark for informing and assessing water purchase tenders, highlighting the importance of transaction costs and the economic impact on rural areas.

eryder
Télécharger la présentation

Water Buyback in the Segura River Basin: A Policy Option for Restoring Balance and Protecting the Environment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WHERE. The Segura River Basin in SE Spain > Area: 18 870 km² (MDB = 1 061 469 km², about 60 times larger) > Population ≃ 2.1 million (similar to MDB) 1

  2. WHERE. The Segura River Basin in SE Spain > Semi-arid basin > Rainfall is uneven and unequally distributed > Non-perennial rivers > 1950s irrigation expansion (↑ productivity) > Agriculture: 89% of total water use > Supply: 760 M m3; Demand: 1,900 M m3; WEI: 2.5 (1.15 including TSWT & desalination) > Water is gold 2

  3. Water in SE Spain: Giving gold for free > Average water charge: 0.09 EUR/m3 3

  4. WHY water buyback • > De iure, RBAs are entitled to limit/revoke water concessions that harm the environment, without compensation • > De facto, concessions are renewed automatically • > Transaction costs • > Negative economic impact on rural areas • > Water buyback aims at: • > restoring environmental flows; • > compensating farmers (& overcome resistance); and • > compensating other possible negative feedbacks • > Since 2006 government agencies can use exchange centers to buy water concessions • > This paper offers a benchmark to inform and assess water purchase tenders 4

  5. HOW. Compensatingvariation • > Water buyback aims at reducing withdrawals and restoring environmental flows • > Problem: rent extraction • > Challenge: place bids consistent with the shadow price of the would-be seller • > Shadow price: • > foregone income resulting from strengthening the water constraint • > foregone utility (compensating variation) • > Benchmark: capitalized value of the shadow price 5

  6. THE MODEL > Preferences are revealed in two stages (Agricultural Water Demand Units): > First, relevant attributes are obtained > Second, the utility function is calibrated 6

  7. Revealing the attributes 7

  8. Revealing the attributes Key concept: Possibility frontier – built based on feasible decisions using GAMS Profit (Π) > Not consistent with a rational agent. Something is missing here > Risk aversion (σ)? Max feasibleΠ 0 Observed Π σ Observed Π, σ Five (m=5) attributes explored: > Expected gross variable margin (z1) > risk avoidance (z2) > Total labor avoidance (z3) > hired labor avoidance (z4) > Variable costs avoidance (z5) All attributes are normalized Observed Π, σ 0 Π 8

  9. Calibrating the Utility function > In equilibrium the MTR equals the MSR > Taking a CRE Utility Function (Cobb-Douglas) σ 0 Π 9

  10. Calibration results 10

  11. Simulation > Water constraint strengthened from 0 to 50% of the concession > Gross variable margin and utility are estimated > Foregone income and foregone utility obtained > Capitalized using the 3-year average interest rate of the 30-year Spanish Treasury Bond, 3.7% as of January 2016 11

  12. Simulationresults: buybackprice 12

  13. Simulationresults: buybackprice RtB in the MDB; $3.1 billion NSW - Murray (Below Choke): $2,072 13

  14. Conclusions • > Water buyback can help restore the balance • > Average price about 3800 EUR/ML • > A few caveats: • > Informal abstractions: track and ban, do not empower (not again!) • > Use water bought for environmental purposes • > not to maintain allotments during droughts (define environmental flows) • > Define priority areas for buyback (downstream vs upstream) • > This is but a policy option –others may exist • > Charges • > Insurance • > etc. • > Explore complementarities, sequencing • > Transaction costs are the key 14

  15. Thanks for your attention This research is part of a project that has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 660608. http://wateragora.eu/ 15

  16. Annex 16

  17. Error terms 17

More Related