1 / 24

Validating Self-Reported Education: Results of a Pilot Study Jesse Rothstein Cecilia Rouse

Validating Self-Reported Education: Results of a Pilot Study Jesse Rothstein Cecilia Rouse Ashley Miller. How many high school graduates are there?. Current Population Survey Gives “status completion” rate: # of 25-year-old graduates / 25-year-old population Common Core of Data

ethel
Télécharger la présentation

Validating Self-Reported Education: Results of a Pilot Study Jesse Rothstein Cecilia Rouse

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Validating Self-Reported Education: Results of a Pilot Study Jesse Rothstein Cecilia Rouse Ashley Miller

  2. How many high school graduates are there? • Current Population Survey Gives “status completion” rate:# of 25-year-old graduates / 25-year-old population • Common Core of Data Gives “school-based completion rate”:# of graduates in year t / # of 9th graders in t-3. • CPS estimates much higher than CCD estimates • 2000/2 cohorts: 84% CPS vs. 70% CCD

  3. CPS vs. CCD-based graduation rates

  4. Two easy issues • HS diploma attainment rises with age in CPS • Delayed completion? • Adult education / GEDs? • Misreporting? • “9th grade bulge” • CCD estimates usually use 9th grade enrollment as denominator • Many students are held back in 9th grade • 9th grade enrollment consistently about 7-10% higher than 8th grade enrollment through 1990s • These reduce the problem, but don’t eliminate it.

  5. CPS vs. CCD-based graduation rates

  6. Not very sensitive to definitions • CCD-based estimates all tend to yield similar answers. • Mishel and Roy (2006): Get same answers with CPS, Census, NELS, NLSY.

  7. Alternative graduation rates, existing data

  8. Not very sensitive to definitions • CCD-based estimates all tend to yield similar answers. • Mishel and Roy (2006): Get same answers with CPS, Census, NELS, NLSY. • Except!  Some evidence that GEDs can account for a lot of the discrepancy (Heckman and LaFontaine 2007)

  9. Alternative graduation rates, existing data

  10. Potential explanations • Attainment increase with age is poorly understood • Proxy responses in CPS may overstate graduation • Respondents may overstate own graduation • “Some college” may not have graduated HS • Regular diplomas vs. GEDs, certificates of attendance, adult ed., etc. • Public vs. private schools • Immigrants/emigrants since HS • Grade retention • Divergent definitions in CCD • CPS excludes armed forces, prisoners • Poor coverage in CPS

  11. Potential explanations that we will address • Attainment increase with age is poorly understood • Proxy responses in CPS may overstate graduation • Respondents may overstate own graduation • “Some college” may not have graduated HS • Regular diplomas vs. GEDs, certificates of attendance, adult ed., etc. • Public vs. private schools • Immigrants/emigrants since HS • Grade retention • Divergent definitions in CCD • CPS excludes armed forces, prisoners • Poor coverage in CPS

  12. Our Sample…. • Sample frame = Households likely to have an 18-25 year old member (complied by a commercial vendor). • We purchased 1,000 (randomly selected) phone numbers. • Our target was 50 “completed” inteviews.

  13. Survey implementation consisted of three steps. Step 1: Mimic the CPS • Conduct a “CPS-style” interview with a HH member who was at least 18 years old (the “household respondent”). Note: We ended up with 2 versions (“A” and “B”) where version “A” asked for a full HH roster while version “B” asked initially if an 18-25 year old lived in the HH; only asked questions about one 18-25 year old. • Probe more on education questions, particularly regarding alternative types of high school degrees. • Ask for the name and location of the last high school attended by the young adult, as well as year of high school graduation.

  14. Step 2: Verify Proxy Report and Respondent Understanding of CPS-style Education Question • Ask similar “CPS-style” education questions of the young adult him or herself (“initial report”). • Probe further on education questions (“final report”). • Also ask for the name and location of last high school attended as well as year of high school graduation.

  15. Step 3: Verify Proxy and Self-reports with Administrative Data • Send a letter to the high school requesting verification of reported high school graduation information. • Follow-up with a telephone call for a subset of schools that did not respond within 10-12 days.

  16. Table 1: Sample sizes (Part I)

  17. Table 1: Sample sizes (Part II)

  18. Table 1: Sample sizes (Part III)

  19. Conclusion • We find a high level of agreement between proxy respondents, the young adults themselves and high school administrative records on whether individual has a high school diploma (or equivalent). • We see less agreement between proxy respondents and young adults on college attendance. • Questions about modes of high school completion should be asked of those with a college education as well as those with only a high school education.

More Related