1 / 58

Coastal Engineering – Theory and Practice

Coastal Engineering – Theory and Practice . DRAFT ! J. W. Kamphuis Queen’s University Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6. This paper and presentation are posted on: www.civil.queensu.ca. Abstract:

evan
Télécharger la présentation

Coastal Engineering – Theory and Practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Coastal Engineering – Theory and Practice DRAFT ! J. W. Kamphuis Queen’s University Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6 This paper and presentation are posted on: www.civil.queensu.ca J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  2. Abstract: This paper attempts to identify from historical and sociological perspectives how coastal engineering has developed. J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  3. Abstract (Cont’d): Particular attention is paid to how its theory and practice have developed and are becoming alienated so that they no longer complement each other. It presents some possible methods to preclude further separation and bring about possible symbiosis. J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  4. 1. History J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  5. The history of Coastal Science and Engineering is related to the history of civilization and societal development . J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  6. 1. History Societal Development Paradigm Shifts J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  7. 1. History Thinking (Western) • Age of Providence – Please the god(s) and all is well • Age of Enlightenment – Replace inscrutable laws of fickle god(s) with constant laws of nature, which can be studied and understood and in time we should be able to chart our own course. J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  8. 1. History But… : • Philosophers such as Nietzsche and Heidegger began to question the “Yes we Can!” euphoria. • Much of this took place in the late 19th Century • This began the postmodern era. • (Except in areas of science and technology, business and others). J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  9. 1. History Coastal Engineering grew up in the “Late Modern” age • Wave forecasting for allied troop landings in 1944 • Large expansion of facilities needed • Initial study of shores and shore protection. • ICCE began 1950. J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  10. 1. History Modern Aspects of Coastal Science and Engineering • Given time and funding we thought we could (think we can?) improve solutions indefinitely and give ever more accurate answers. • In the beginning the funding was there. • In the beginning the need for improvements to shores and facilities wasthere. J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  11. 1. History But then….. • We lost confidence in our basic tool of coastal engineering and research, the trial and error tool, the physical model. • Models had reached practical limits; they could only provide answers up to a certain level of accuracy, larger models could not produce better results and became too costly. • (The computer arrived, but it just extended the euphoria by 40 years. J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  12. 1. History And we found… • Numerical modeling cannot reveal “the truth” when combined with field research alone. • Good coastal engineering may not necessarily be considered good by all. • There are no single, unique approaches to problems and no single answers. • This was essentially the end of modernity for Coastal Engineering and Science. J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  13. 2. Learning J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  14. 2. Learning Learning (or Development) Curve Oops ! Development (Knowledge, Religion, Business) Rapid Progress Time J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  15. 2. Learning Ages of the Learning Curve Old age Development (Knowledge, Religion, Business) Maturity Infancy Time J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  16. 2. Learning ? ? The Learning Curve of Knowledge Postmodern Modern Era Enlightenment Knowledge Yes. we can ! Time 1700 1600 2000 1800 1900 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  17. 2. Learning Learning Curve + Kuhn (1977) Science becomes subculture (talks to itself) Work is addressed to peers and adjudicated by peers Challenges are internally imposed (Improvement of theories, validating paradigm) Old age Knowledge Pressing problems are solved Development of sophisticated theories Paradigm is articulated Maturity Solution of pressing practical problems Much empiricism Infancy Time J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  18. 2. Learning Paradigm Shift Paradigm Shift (Sharp Break with the Old) Development (Knowledge, Religion, Business) Time J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  19. 2. Learning Learning Curve - Photography Digital Colour Photography Film Plates Paradigm Shift Time J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  20. 2. Learning Possible Decline Paradigm Shift Development (Knowledge, Religion, Business) Knowledge and development can decline after paradigm shift due to lack of interest, people moving on to greener fields. Time J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  21. 3. Application of the Learning Curve + Kuhn to Coastal Engineering and Science J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  22. Warning • Some of the following may be offensive some of you. • It will contain coarse language. • It will contain scenes of nudity (the emperor has no clothes). • Even so… there are signs of hope, indications of improvement, possibilities for further course correction and improvement, etc. J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  23. Disclaimer • I use Kuhn’s work here. • It is perceptive. • But, as with all theoretical concepts, it is based on simplifications (as is this preentation). • Nevertheless, it is useful to gain insight into the development of coastal engineering and the theory/practice subject of this conference J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  24. 3. Application 3a. Learning Curve + Kuhn (1977) This fits coastal theoretical work, but not coastal practice Coastal Engineering becomes a subculture. Work is addressed to peers and adjudicated by peers. Challenges are internally imposed (Improvement of theories, validating paradigm). Old age Knowledge Pressing problems are solved Development of sophisticated theories Paradigm is articulated Maturity Solution of pressing practical problems Much empiricism Infancy Time J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  25. 3. Application Stages of Knowledge Re-Interpreted Theory and practice become separate cultures. Research goes much beyond solution of practical engineering problems. Theory: Challenges internally posed, peer adjudication Practice: External adjudication by clients and public Old age Knowledge “Practice” and “Theory” work together to develop, more sophisticated methods – Theory supports practical solutions. Maturity “Practice” develops to solve (simpler) practical problems using much empiricism. Infancy Time J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  26. 3. Application 3b. Amplification of “Old Age” Theory Theory and practice become separate cultures. Research goes much beyond solution of practical engineering problems. Theory: Challenges internally posed, peer adjudication Practice: External adjudication by clients and public The difference is the Adjudication ! Practice Overstatement to focus on the issues! J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  27. 3. Application How did we get there ? • Traditionally, decision making and design was simple. A project owner hired an engineer, a practical individual, who simplified concepts, designed by trial and error (models) – Infancy. • Then we improved our solutions with formal university courses, given by (practicing) engineers and who conducted research in support of better engineering - Maturity. J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  28. 3. Application How did we get there? • Universities want to be “universities” and not “trade schools”. This means Research as well as teaching of Practice. • The Universities need to emphasize research • To generate additional income • To develop reputation • This normally comes at the expense of teaching. J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  29. 3. Application How did we get there? • By research, universities understand (Peer Reviewed) Publications and Citations, purported to be: • Hard evidence of scientific achievement • Improvement of scientific theories • Validation of the existing paradigm, etc J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  30. 3. Application How did we get there? • This “Research” has become a self-contained game (as in Old Age as defined by Kuhn - “a subculture that talks to itself”) • This Research/Publish or Perish culture defines who we are both as researchers/theoreticians and as practicing engineers. J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  31. 3. Application How did we get there? • Researchers/Theoreticians. • TheResearch/Publish or Perish culture defines research funding, hiring, salaries, promotion and tenure. • This forces Engineering Profs, Ph.D’s, Postdocs and Graduate Students (our brightest minds) into the research game and away from practice (and from teaching engineering). • Discussion with Sam J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  32. 3. Application How did we get there? • Since the Engineering Profs must focus mainly on research, students are less exposed to actual, practical engineering concepts, supported by their prof’s practical experience. • The busy profs also relegate teaching to PhDs and postdocs, who have little or no practical experience. J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  33. 3. Application How did we get there? • Engineers in Practice • At the same time theResearch/Publish or Perish culture also defines engineers in practice: • They are outside the system • There is no incentive for them to join hands with their researcher/theoretician colleagues. • They walk away from the very that defines them and their colleagues J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  34. 3. Application How did we get there? • This rant about the disconnect between practice and theory (engineering and research) is not unique. It is voiced regularly in civil engineering and in other applied science disciplines. It is also voiced in other professional disciplines, such as medicine, law, etc. J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  35. 3. Application Finally How did we get there? • The peer review system that drives the publish/perish and reward systems is seriously flawed. • Because of specialization, adjudicating peers are close colleagues, often friends. • This is not objective adjudication • It tends to preserve the status quo • The system is of little interest to engineers in practice and v.v. , thus missing a vital input The emperor is clearly without clothes! J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  36. 3. Application • In light of: • Climate change - sea level rise, increased storm activity • Man-induced land subsidence. • Continued population encroachment upon the world’s shorelines. • We can no longer afford to: J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  37. 3. Application • We can no longer afford to: • Institutionally reduce Coastal Engineering to peer- adjudicated Coastal Research • Downgrade the teaching of practical engineering. • Support a rewards system that is based on the number of citations and published papers • Support peer review systems, university education and technical conferences that draw young people away from practical engineering and into more theoretical science. (Easier, safer, sexier?). • There are many hopeful signs ! (e.g. 1st yr design) J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  38. 3. Application • We still need engineers who can synthesize technical information and integrate it with Socio-Economic constraints to formulate problems accurately and to provide solutions to very complex problems (Quote). • This is not Science – it is Engineering; the application of science to real life problems for practical answers. • And future problems will not become any easier or less urgent. J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  39. 3. Application 3c. Coastal Learning Curves ?? Today 1970 100 Numerical Modeling Physical Modelling ? 75 Development % of Potential 50 Process Knowledge Data Collection 25 Time 0 1950 1910 1930 1970 1990 2010 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  40. 3. Application Today 1970 • 1970: • The steepness of the numerical modeling, process knowledge and field measurement curves resulted from the introduction of computers. • We took full advantage of the opportunities provided by the computer. Development (% of potential) 100 Physical Modeling Numerical Modeling 75 50 Process Knowledge (Theory) Field Data Collection 25 Time 0 1910 1950 1930 1970 1990 2010 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  41. 3. Application Today 1970 • 2011: • All learning curves are quite flat. • This is the “Old Age” of Coastal Engineering • Therefore, we can not - must not - continue along the old paths followed since 1970. Development (% of potential) 100 Physical Modeling Numerical Modeling 75 50 Process Knowledge (Theory) Field Data Collection 25 Time 0 1910 1950 1930 1970 1990 2010 J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  42. 3. Application Coastal Learning Curve – Another view ? Paradigm Shift ?? (Introduction of computers) Development (Knowledge, Religion, Business) Decline in knowledge and development of Physical Modeling Time J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  43. 4. How can we proceed? J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  44. Proceed? • Rapid advancement can occur through a paradigm shift • We should be so fortunate! • We need to encourage it by funding real innovative thinking with money that is not tied to publications only. • Set up a “Coastal Think Tank” ? J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  45. Proceed? • In the meantime, to advance at all (to be able to deal with the present and future design complexities, uncertainties and the approvals process) we need a concerted (and integrated) effort on all fronts – process knowledge (theory), physical modeling, numerical modeling, field measurement. J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  46. Proceed? • We must take advantage of the particular strengths of each element. • We must integrate science and engineering, re-integrate theory and practice and integrate our tools, people, facilities and cultures. J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  47. Proceed? • Specialization has occurred within coastal engineering, e.g. numerical modeling, waves, sediment transport, breakwaters, environmental, construction, etc. • This is inevitable – it is the “continental drift” of progress of knowledge. • It is generated in a positive feedback loop with peer review. • But… J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  48. Proceed? • To be able to solve practical problems, we must connect the various ‘expert silos’ better and concentrate on the more general concepts of coastal engineering, as well as on the specialties. • This will be very difficult, since career advancement is generally based on specialization, publication, etc (It is like stopping continental drift?). J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  49. 5. Integration(of cultures, expertise, tools and people) J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

  50. Integration Closer (physical) integration of cultures • Theory ↔ Practice • University Education ↔ Engineering • Physical ↔ Numerical Model (ing, ers) • Physical Laboratory Space J.W. Kamphuis Coastal Eng. Theory and Practice

More Related