1 / 6

Stephen Bluestone March 20, 2008 Propulsion Final Presentation Slides

Stephen Bluestone March 20, 2008 Propulsion Final Presentation Slides. 1. Engine Sizing. The amount of propellant required for each rocket/stage was determined in Model Analysis Inert mass fraction, f inert , was optimized between the structures and propulsion groups for final design.

eyad
Télécharger la présentation

Stephen Bluestone March 20, 2008 Propulsion Final Presentation Slides

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Stephen BluestoneMarch 20, 2008PropulsionFinal Presentation Slides AAE 450 Spring 2008 1

  2. Engine Sizing • The amount of propellant required for each rocket/stage was determined in Model Analysis • Inert mass fraction, finert, was optimized between the structures and propulsion groups for final design

  3. Engine Cost • Cost of Engines calculated from equations based on mass flow, thrust, and dry weight • Cost equations are extrapolated from historical values

  4. Historical Failure Probability • U.S. Solid Rocket Systems (Failures/Attempts) • 6 / 412 (1.4%) Failures between 1980-20041 • 19 / 3382 (0.56%) Failures between 1964-19982 • Solid Propulsion Failure Rates (Failures/Attempts) • Upper Stage 0.0161 161/10000 • Monolithic 0.0025 25/10000 • Segmented 0.0077 77/10000 • Total 0.0056 56/10000 AAE 450 Spring 2008 Propulsion – Propellants

  5. Catastrophic Failure • Historically Solid Rocket failure results in catastrophic failure 37% of the time (19 solid failures, 7 were catastrophic) [1964-1998]1 • Solid Rocket Failure Rate (Failures/Attempts) • Failure 0.0056, 56/10000 • Catastrophic Failure 0.0021, 21/10000 AAE 450 Spring 2008 Propulsion - Propellants

  6. References • Nieroski, John S., and Friedland, Edward I., “Liquid Rocket Engine Cost Estimating Relationships,” AIAA Paper 65-533, July 1965. • Humble, Ronald W., Henry, Gary N., Larson, Wiley J. “Hybrid Rocket Propulsion Systems,” Space Propulsion Analysis and Design, 1st ed. revised, Primis, New York, 1995 • Chang, I-Shih., Tomei, Edmardo Joe., “Solid Rocket Failures in World Space Launches.” AIAA Paper 2005-3793, Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 41st, Tuscon, Az, July 10-13, 2005 • Sauvageu, Donald R., Allen, Brian D., “Launch Vehicle Historical Reliability.” AIAA-1998-3979 AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 34th, Cleveland, OH, July 13-15, 1998

More Related