1 / 41

MeerKAT Radio Telescope

MeerKAT Radio Telescope. Willem Esterhuyse MeerKAT Project Manager willem@ska.ac.za 083 447 1615. Introduction. Presenting work from BAE/MMS/EMSS/SE etc . In many cases preliminary results Very Short /KAT7 MeerKAT overview Phases (XDM/KAT7/MeerKAT), composite dishes, progress

eydie
Télécharger la présentation

MeerKAT Radio Telescope

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MeerKAT Radio Telescope Willem Esterhuyse MeerKAT Project Manager willem@ska.ac.za 083 447 1615

  2. Introduction • Presenting work from BAE/MMS/EMSS/SE etc. • In many cases preliminary results • Very Short /KAT7 MeerKAT overview • Phases (XDM/KAT7/MeerKAT), composite dishes, progress • Antenna on critical path - rest of this talk • CoDR to MeerKAT Antenna Spec • Open Issues from CoDR addressed • Additional work required - from concept to reality • Spec changes to arrive at final system spec • Schedule/Infrastructure Interfaces (infrastructure accelerated) • Had to fix interfaces early • Other Antenna risks (not addressed above) • KAT7 – MeerKAT: Impact on Infrastructure

  3. Antenna Manufacture (KAT7) Off-site On-site

  4. Reflector Manufacture (KAT7) Mould Setup Lay-up/ Transfer Mould Segments Assemble Pattern Process qualified – last 4 KAT7 dishes production quality Machine Pattern Segments

  5. MeerKAT Overview (1) KAT7 MeerKAT • Dec 2007: XDM set to work • ********************************************************** • Jan 2008: Project start (+XDM learning) • April 2008: Antenna contract awarded • Aug 2008: Antenna CDR • Feb 2009: Mould setup on site • Feb 2009: Receiver CDR • Feb 2009: Software approach revisited • Feb 2009: RFE contracts awarded • May 2009: First antenna installed on site • Dec 2009: 5 dishes, 2 receivers, FF correlator • Dec 2009: Fringes • April 2010: 7 dishes, 4 receivers • April 2010: First Image • July 2010: SKA RFI campaign • Oct 2010: ESKOM power on site • Oct 2010: Cold receiver installation • Nov 2010: 10 Mbps link to CT • Dec 2010: 3 cold receivers, 16 element correlator • Jan 2011: Remote observation demonstration • May 2011: UPS installation • July 2011: 7 Cold Feeds • Dec 2011: Engineering completion • March 2010: Science Proposals • July 2010: CoDR • Sept 2010: MeerKAT scope change • Oct 2010: TAC • Jan 2011: URS finalized • Jan 2011: System Spec finalized • July 2011: System PDR • Dec 2011: Antenna Tender • Mar/April 2012: Antenna Contract Award current

  6. MeerKAT Overview (2) • March 2010: Science Proposals received. • July 2010: CoDR (options for MeerKAT with performance, budget, schedule implications on system level for all options presented to and reviewed by international panel who are experts in their fields. • Resulted in change to 64 x 13.5m offset antennas recommendation to steering committee. • Sept 2010: Change (schedule, budget) approved by steering committee. • Oct 2010: TAC input to finalize URS (evaluation of science proposals) • Accepted science proposals drive User Requirement • Jan 2011: System Spec version 1, URS version 2 • Mar 2011: Operational URS • July 2011: System PDR successfully completed • Followed by sub-system “thin specs”, detail spec development • Dec 2011: Antenna Tender (need a spec) • March/April 2012: Antenna Contract award – very tight

  7. MeerKAT – PDR (Panel comments) • “The panel unanimously concludes that the PDR has been successfully passed and congratulates the project teams.” • “Clear and thorough set of documents, made available to the panel well in time.” • “We are extremely impressed by the quality of the project team, and the continued tremendous progress in realising KAT-7 and bringing MeerKAT to its current stage.” • “We commend the project for their intelligent approach towards systems engineering, looking after the fundamental technology development as well as implementing formal procedures.” • “The project has a good baseline of science requirements with a strong and complete analysis leading to system requirements.” • “There has been good interaction with the science community so far.” • “We conclude that the baseline system design satisfies the system requirements.” • CAM: “We’re impressed by the well-engineered system, the extended simulation program and the way in which KAT-7 is used for staged development.”

  8. MeerKAT Overview - Antenna 0.95/0.32mm 1 2 3

  9. CoDR to MeerKAT Antenna Composite reflector Counter-weights Sub Reflector Steel Yoke Steel Pedestal Connecting Structure Feed Indexer

  10. CoDR to MeerKAT Antenna (1) • Open Issues from CoDR addressed • Carbon Fibre cost effect • Alignment of reflectors/Surface Accuracy • Curing Distortions (reflector not symmetric) • FEA to predict curing distortions • Construct 1.8m offset dish • Survey mould/dish to determine distortion • Compare to FEA and update FEA if required • Implement on MeerKAT FEA (main and sub-reflector) • Connecting Beam stiffness • Tolerances/Alignment of sub-reflectors and receiver • Composite Material Qualification for use on Radio Telescopes

  11. Reflector Manufacture (KAT7) Mould Setup Lay-up/ Transfer Mould Segments Assemble Pattern Process qualified – last 4 KAT7 dishes production quality Machine Pattern Segments

  12. Eliminate 1 and 2 Current solution good enough for MeerKAT Study to improve major error contributors (4 and 6) underway MeerKAT Mould Design/Surface Accuracy

  13. OG – Surface Accuracy Calc • Algorithm developed jointly by BAE, EMSS • Verified • Impacted by change in requirements (see later)

  14. OG – Surface Accuracy Calc

  15. Curing Distortions • 5 offset dishes (1.8m diameter moulded) – different resins • 2 x polyesters, 1 x vinyl-ester en 2 x epoxy resins • Same conditions as foreseen for MeerKAT manufacturing • Mould and dishes measured • Difference plotted as distortions • Temperature effects • Chemical (resin shrinkage) • Study not completed

  16. Curing Distortions

  17. Connecting Beam Stiffness • CoDR – 1.5 to 1.8 Hz • After further structural/EM optimization – risk retired • 1st mode 3+ Hz (“yes” mode) • 2nd mode (sideways) more than 4 Hz (“no” mode) • Coupling to wind (non-issue if around 2 Hz) • Control (preferably 3 Hz or higher) • Displacement of subreflector and receiver and subsequent effect on pointing discussed later

  18. Material Qualification • Material qualification • Structural (reflective surface) • Environmental (UV/corrosion/fungus) • Radio quality evaluation of reference and tested panels • Structural tests almost completed • Strength, stiffness, shear properties • Fatigue • Creep • Environmental tests in progress • Test program scheduled for completion Dec 2011

  19. Material Qualification • Thermal Fatigue

  20. Material Qualification • Thermal Mechanical Fatigue Test No of cycles = 365x30x5, “Run-out” 1e6 cycles

  21. Material Qualification • Thermal Mechanical Fatigue Test Manufacturing void (microscopic) – no evidence of deterioration in thermal fatigue run-out test

  22. Material Qualification • Mechanical properties (ASTM/ISO) • Tension • Compression • Shear • Creep

  23. CoDR to MeerKAT Antenna (2) • Additional work required - from concept to reality • Finalize Optical Layout • MMS/EMSS interaction • Receiver (Concept layout done) • Spec changes to final system spec (focus major ones) • Availability/Reliability and implications on system spec • Surface accuracy • Pointing accuracy • System Spec • Achieve spec day 1, but keep upgrades in mind • Later improvements planned • Operational conditions (mainly impact of wind) • Wind load investigation • CFD (qualified)

  24. MeerKAT Dish Optics • Preliminary MeerKAT 13.5m optics (optimised for 64 dishes) • FEA/EM study running in parallel to finalize optimized EM solution that is structurally feasible

  25. Receiver Concept

  26. Operating Conditions

  27. Availability (impact on wind specs) • Can loose 8% of time due to wind – worked on 94% wind availability (i.e. 2% safety factor)

  28. Spec changes

  29. Pointing • Optimal Conditions: 5” (max 15” jitter), with reference pointing • Normal Conditions: 25” • Temperature sensors fitted, not implemented in pointing – future

  30. Pointing Summary 5” • Reference Pointing required (otherwsie to expensive) • * (Ambient Temperature compensation OFF)

  31. Pointing Summary 25” • More work required • Thermal sensors implemented for improvements later

  32. MeerKAT Studies - CFD • Obtain Cp: • Completed in Dec 2012 • Verify approach by running analyses with same assumptions on known analytical solution and compare results

  33. Schedule/Infrastructure Interfaces • Mould/Trolley design (make sure fit in shed/schedule) • Consider options of machining entire mould (too expensive) • Integrate cooling • Done Jan 2012

  34. Risks not addressed • Composite reflector • Experience on XDM and KAT7 • Durability of composites (includes reflectivity) • Reflector accuracy (curing distortions) • Operational performance • Wind loading • Pointing • (Thermal modelling) • Ball-screw • Single-point failure (duty cycle/safety) • Elevation Stage • Drive (sizing/power consumption) • Bearing • Cable Wrap • Encoder Mount Reliability Lightning Protection • Sub Reflector • Accuracy • Feed Indexer • Durability • Cable Wrap • Azimuth Stage • Drive • Bearing • Cable Wrap • Encoder Mount • Connecting Beam • Stiffness (control/ subreflector + feed support • ACU • Functionality • Reliability/Robustness • Control system influence pointing • Foundation • Stability

  35. Impact on Infrastructure • Impact on Infrastructure • Dish Shed Extension • Foundations • Bigger reflector (wind) • Tighter pointing spec • Feed low OG – higher forces in wind stow • Pedestal Integration Area

  36. Foundations: Stow important • Stow • 90 deg elevation • No water accumulation – robust and safe • No compromise on reflector/radio surface • Cost impact on structure is small • Foundations • 5” RMS allowed for movement due to wind under operational conditions • Piling (different lenghts) with CAP best option for all soil types encountered on MeerKAT site

  37. Site Complex Upgrade

  38. Conclusion • OG does represent challenges • Work in the last year achieved the following • Optics definition (shaping?) • Specification development (significant impact on solution – wind) • Includes work to show there is a solution • Verification written along with spec • Composite material qualification (Dec 2011) • Includes curing distortions (Dec 2011) • Reflector alignment/Surface accuracy – algorithm developed and verified – used in concept analyses (verify pointing/accuracies) • CFD – results used in concept analyses FEA • Retired risk on connecting beam stiffness • Interfaces to Infrastructure (foundation lacks final detail, loading specified) • RFI process (verify schedule, budget, technical performance from suppliers) – no serious concerns

  39. Questions?

More Related