1 / 9

Refinery Performance Improvement

Refinery Performance Improvement. Case Study. Background. 50,000 BPD refinery Approximately 300 employees Unionized hourly workforce Expenses too high Volume/yield too low Operating loss of approximately $1.5 million/month Project initiated to improve performance. Project Objectives.

fabian
Télécharger la présentation

Refinery Performance Improvement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Refinery Performance Improvement Case Study

  2. Background • 50,000 BPD refinery • Approximately 300 employees • Unionized hourly workforce • Expenses too high • Volume/yield too low • Operating loss of approximately $1.5 million/month • Project initiated to improve performance

  3. Project Objectives • Improve refinery bottom-line performance by $26,000,000 vs. previous year • Reduce ongoing expenses by $15,000,000 • One-time expense reductions would not count against the target • Expense reductions must be sustainable • Improve volume/yield by $11,000,000 • Previous year’s margins were used as a basis for calculating volume/yield performance • Would not be hurt by falling prices by rising prices • Would not be helped by rising prices

  4. Project Results • Financial performance improved by $26.812 million relative to previous year’s levels • $18.616 million from expense reductions • $8.196 million from increased volume/yield • At the same time, average overtime was reduced from 23.5% to 8.8%

  5. Key Expense Savings Categoriesvs. Previous Year $ in Millions Compensation * $ 6.5 Catalyst & Chemicals 3.8 Contract Services 2.4 Turnaround Accrual 1.9 Materials 1.4 Other 2.6 Total $ 18.6 * This was achieved without a reduction in force.

  6. Keys to Success • Management team commitment to the project • Management team “owned” the project • Ongoing focus on Key Performance Indicators (financial and non-financial) • Extensive employee involvement • Idea generation – Over 1300 ideas, resulting in over 110 improvement projects • Participation in project implementation • Ongoing focus on non-financial Key Performance Indicators

  7. Keys to Success • Structured implementation process with an emphasis on achieving sustainable bottom-line results – not just projections • Project tracking and follow-up • Project database placed on the network • Regularly scheduled project update meetings between project managers and management team • Work process improvement • Increased efficiency through revising, adding, or deleting individual work processes

  8. Keys to Success • Ongoing communication • Multiple methods and media • Incentive award based on project success • External, dedicated project manager • Served as a catalyst for change • Provided an independent perspective • Maintained momentum

  9. For More Information, Contact: • The McCollum Group, LLC • Consultants to Management • Robert M. Robinson, Ph.D. • (281) 578-1495 1503 Leatherwood • rrobinson@themccollumgroup.comKaty, Texas 77450

More Related